A comparison of traditional and phylogenetic nomenclature

Taxon

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 561-579

  Moore, Gerry ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NOMENCLATURE; PHYLOGENETICS;

LINNAEA;

EID: 0031874702     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1223578     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Arthur, J. C. & al. [22 co-authors]. 1904. Code of botanical nomenclature. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 31: 249-261.
2. _ & al. [18 co-authors]. 1907. American code of botanical nomenclature. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 34: 167-178.
3. Bailey, L. H. 1929. Statements on the systematic study of variables. Pp. 1427-1433 in: Duggar, S. N. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Congress of Plant Sciences. Menasha, WI.
4. Berendsohn, W. G. 1995. The concept of "potential taxa" in databases. Taxon 44: 207-212.
5. Bohs, L. & Olmstead, R. G. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships in Solanum (Solanaceae) based on ndhF sequences. Syst. Bot. 22: 5-17.
6. Britton, N. L. 1893. Proceedings of the Botanical Club, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Madison Meeting, August 18-22, 1893. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 20: 360-365.
7. Brummitt, R. K. 1996a. In defence of paraphyletic taxa. Pp. 371-384 in: Maesen, L. J. G. van der, Burgt, X. M. van der & Medenbach de Rooy, J. M. van (ed.), The biodiversity of African plants. Proceedings XIVth AETFAT Congress 22-27. August 1994, Wageningen, the Netherlands. Dordrecht.
8. _ 1997. Taxonomy versus cladonomy, a fundamental controversy in biological systematics. Taxon 46: 723-734.
9. Bruns, T. D., White, T. J., & Taylor, J. W. 1991. Fungal molecular systematics. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22: 525-564.
10. Bryant, H. N. 1994. Comments on the phylogenetic definition of taxon names and conventions regarding the names of crown clades. Syst. Biol. 43: 124-130.
11. _ 1996. Explicitness, stability, and universality in the phylogenetic definition and usage of taxon names: a case study of the phylogenetic taxonomy of the Carnivora (Mammalia). Syst. Biol. 45: 174-189.
12. _ 1997. Cladistic information in phylogenetic definitions and designated phylogenetic contexts for the use of taxon names. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 62: 495-503.
13. Buck, R. C. & Hall, D. L. 1966. The logical structure of the Linnaean hierarchy. Syst. Zool. 15:97-111.
14. Cain, A. J. 1959. The post-Linnaean development of taxonomy Proc. Linn. Soc. London 170: 185-217.
15. Candolle, A. de, 1867. Lois de la nomenclature botanique adoptées par le Congrès International de Botanique tenu à Paris en août 1867... . Paris.
16. Cantino, P. D., Olmstead, R. G. & Wagstaff, S. J. 1997. A comparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current system: a botanical case study. Syst. Biol. 46: 313-331.
17. Castroviejo, S. & Brummitt, R. K. 1996. (03) A proposal to add a Note after Article 11.4. Taxon 45: 567.
18. Chase, M. W. & al. [47 co-authors]. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580.
19. Cook, O. F. 1898. The method of types in botanical nomenclature. Science 8: 513-516.
20. _ 1900. The method of types. Science 12: 475-481.
21. Cronquist, A. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering plants, ed. 2. New York.
22. Dahlgren, R. M. T. 1980. A revised system of classification of angiosperms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 91-124.
23. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species. London.
24. Davis, J. I. 1995. A phylogenetic structure of the monocotyledons, as inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation, and a comparison of measures of clade support. Syst. Bot. 20: 503-527.
25. De Queiroz, K. 1992. Phylogenetic definitions and taxonomic philosophy. Biol. & Philos. 7: 295-313.
26. _ 1995. The definitions of species and clade names: a reply to Ghiselin. Biol. & Philos. 10: 223-228.
27. _ 1996. A phylogenetic approach to biological nomenclature as an alternative to the Linnaean systems in current use. In: Reveal, J. L. (ed.), Proceedings of a mini-symposium on biological nomenclature in the 21st century. College Park, MD. [http://www.inform.umd. edu/PBIO/nomcl/dequ.html].
28. _ 1997. Misunderstandings about the phylogenetic approach to biological nomenclature: a reply to Lidén and Oxelman. Zool. Scripta 26: 67-70.
29. _ & Gauthier, J. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definition of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39: 307-322.
30. _ & _ 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 449-480.
31. _ & _ 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 27-31.
32. Duvall, M. R., Learn, G. H., Eguiarte, L. E., & Clegg, M. T. 1993a. Phylogenetic analysis of rbcL sequences identifies Acorus calamus as the primal extant monocotyledon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90: 4641-4644.
33. _ , Clegg, M. T., Chase, M. W., Clark, W. D., Kress, W. J., Hills, H. G., Eguiarte, L. E., Smith, J. F., Gaut, B. S., Zimmer, E. A. & Learn, G. H. 1993b. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the monocotyledons constructed from rbcL data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 607-619.
34. Engler, A. 1887-1889. Araceae. Pp. 102-153 in: Engler, A. & Prantl, K., Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2(3). Leipzig.
35. Fairchild, D. G. 1892. Proceedings of the Botanical Club of the Forty-first Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Rochester, New York, August 18-24, 1892. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 19: 281-297.
36. Farber, P. L. 1976. The type concept in zoology during the first half of the nineteenth century. J. Hist. Biol. 9: 93-119.
37. Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27: 401-410.
38. Fensome, R. A. & Skog, J. E. 1997. (04-05) Two proposal to amend provisions regarding form-genera of fossil plants. Taxon 46: 557-562.
39. Fernald, M. L. 1929. Roundtable discussion: botanical nomenclature. Pp. 1564-1569 in: Duggar, S. N. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Congress of Plant Sciences. Menasha, WI.
40. Freudenstein, J. V. 1998. Paraphyly, ancestors, and classification - a response to Sosef and Brummitt. Taxon 47: 95-104.
41. Frost, D. R. & Kluge, A. G. 1994. A consideration of epistemology in systematic biology, with special reference to species. Cladistics 10: 259-294.
42. Gardiner, B. G. 1993. Haematothermia: warm-blooded amniotes. Cladistics 9: 369-395.
43. Ghiselin, M. T. 1997. Metaphyiscs and the origin of species. Albany, NY.
44. Gray, A. 1887. Annotations. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 14: 228-229.
45. Greene, E. L. 1887. Bibliographical notes on well known plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 14: 215-218.
46. Greuter, W., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Chaloner, W. G., Demoulin, V., Hawksworth D. L., Jørgensen, P. M., Nicolson, D. H., Silva, P. C., Trehane P. & McNeill, J. 1994. International code of botanical nomenclature (Tokyo code) adopted by the Fifteenth International Botanical Congress, Yokohama, August-September 1993. Regnum. Veg. 131.
47. _ , Brummitt, R. K., Farr, E., Kilian, N., Kirk, P. M., & Silva, P. C. 1993. NCU-3. Names in current use for extant plant genera. Regnum Veg. 129.
48. _ , Hawksworth, D. L., McNeill, J., Mayo, M. A., Minelli, A., Sneath, P. H. A., Tindall, B. J., Trehane, P. & Tubbs, P. 1998. Draft Biocode (1997): the prospective international rules for the scientific names of organisms. Taxon 47: 127-150.
49. Griffiths, G. C. D. 1973. Some fundamental problems in biological classification. Syst. Zool. 22: 338-343.
50. _ 1974. On the foundations of biological systematics. Acta Biotheor. 23: 85-131.
51. _ 1976. The future of Linnaean nomenclature. Syst. Zool. 25: 168-173.
52. Hitchcock, A. S. 1905. Nomenclatorial type specimens of plant species. Science 21: 828-832.
53. Hoch, P. C. & Raven, P. H. 1995. Introduction: perspectives in plant biosystematics. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 53: XI-XXII.
54. Knox, E. 1998. The use of hierarchies as organizational models in systematics. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 63: 1-49.
55. Kron, K. A. 1997. Exploring alternative systems of classification. Aliso 15: 105-112.
56. Lapage, S. P., Sneath, P. H. A., Lessel, E. F., Skerman, V. B. D., Seeliger, H. P. R. & Clark, W. A. 1992. International code of nomenclature of bacteria and statutes of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology and statutes of the Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology Section of the International Union of Microbiological Societies. Bacteriological code 1990 revision. Washington, DC.
57. Lee, M. R. 1996. The phylogenetic approach to biological taxonomy: practical aspects. Zool. Scripta 25: 187-190.
58. _ 1998. Ancestors and taxonomy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 26.
59. Lidén, M. 1997. Process and pattern again. In response to Sosef. Taxon 46: 527-528.
60. _ & Oxelman, B. 1996. Do we need "phylogenetic taxonomy"? Zool. Scripta 25: 183-185.
61. _ , Oxelman, B., Backlund, A., Andersson, L., Bremer, B., Eriksson, R., Moberg, R., Nordal, I., Persson, K., Thulin, M. & Zimmer, B. 1997. Charlie is our darling. Taxon 46: 735-738.
62. Mayr, E. 1997. This is biology: the science of the living world. Cambridge, MA.
63. Meacham, C. A. & Duncan, T. 1987. The necessity of convex groups in biological classification. Syst. Bot. 12: 78-90.
64. Melville, R. V. 1995. Towards stability in the names of animals - a history of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1895-1995. London.
65. Michener, C. D. 1964. The possible use of uninomial nomenclature to increase the stability of names in biology. Syst. Zool.: 13: 182-190.
66. Minelli, A. 1995. The changing paradigms of biological systematics: new challenges to the principles and practice of biological nomenclature. Bull. Zool. Nomencl. 52: 303-309.
67. Nicolson, D. H. 1977. Typification of names vs. typification of taxa; proposal on Article 48 and reconsideration of Mitracarpus hirtus vs. M. villosus (Rubiaceae). Taxon 26: 569-574.
68. _ 1991. A history of botanical nomenclature. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 78: 33-56.
69. _ 1996. Animal, vegetable, or mineral? In: Reveal, J. L. (ed.), Proceedings of a minisymposium on biological nomenclature in the 21st century. University of Maryland [http: //www.inform.umd.edu/PBIO/nomcl/nicol.html].
70. Olmstead, R. G. & Palmer, J. D. 1997. Implications for phylogeny, classification, and biogeography of Solanum from cpDNA restriction site variation Syst. Bot. 22: 19-29.
71. _ , Pamphilis, C. W. de, Wolfe, A. D., Young, N. D. & Reeves, P. A. 1998. Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae: from the ashes. Amer. J. Bot. 85, Suppl.: 148-149.
72. _ & Reeves, P. A. 1994. Evidence for the polyphyly of the Scrophulariaceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 176-183.
73. Pennell, F. W. 1935. The Scrophulariaceae of eastern temperate North America. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia Monogr. 1: 1-650.
74. Pennisi, E. 1996. Evolutionary and systematic biologists converge. Science 273: 181-182.
75. Qiu, Y.-L., Chase, M. W., Les, D. H. & Parks, C. R. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of the Magnoliidae: cladistic analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 587-606.
76. Rasnitsyn, A. P. 1996. Conceptual issues in phylogeny, taxonomy, and nomenclature. Contr. Zool. (Amsterdam) 66: 3-42.
77. Ride, W. D. L. 1988. Towards a unified system of biological nomenclature. Pp. 332-353 in: Hawksworth, D. L. (ed.), Prospects in systematics. Oxford.
78. _ 1991. Justice for the living: a review of bacteriological and zoological initiatives in nomenclature. [In: Hawksworth, D. L. (ed.), Stability of names: needs and options]. Regnum. Veg. 123: 105-122.
79. _ , Sabrosky, C. W., Bernardi, G. & Mellville, R. V. 1985. International code of zoological nomenclature, ed. 3. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
80. Schander, C. & Thollesson, M. 1995. Phylogenetic taxonomy - some comments. Zool. Scripta 24: 263-268.
81. Schwenk, K. 1994. Comparative biology and the importance of cladistic classification: a case study from the sensory biology of the squamate reptiles. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 52: 69-82.
82. Soltis, D. E., Kuzoff, R. K., Conti, E., Gornall, R. & Ferguson, K. 1996. matK and rbcL gene sequence data indicate that Saxifraga (Saxifragaceae) is polyphyletic. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 371-382.
83. Sosef, M. S. M. 1997. Hierarchical models, reticulate evolution, and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa. Taxon 46: 75-85.
84. Spooner, D. M., Anderson, G. J. & Jansen, R. K. 1993. Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes, and pepinos (Solanaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 80: 676-688.
85. Stafleu, F. 1971. Linnaeaus and the Linnaeans. Regnum Veg. 79.
86. Stevens, P. F. 1984. Metaphors and typology in the development of botanical systematics 1690-1960, or the art of putting new wine in old bottles. Taxon 33: 169-211.
87. _ 1994. The development of biological systematics: Antoine-Laurent de Jussieu, nature, and the natural system. New York.
88. _ 1997. How to interpret botanical classifications - suggestions from history. BioScience 47: 243-250.
89. Strickland, H. E., Phillips, J., Richardson, J. Owen, R., Jenyns, L., Broderip, W. J., Henslow, J. S., Shuckard, W. E., Waterhouse, G. R., Yarrell, W., Darwin, C. & Westwood, J. O. 1843. Report of a committee appointed "to consider of the rules by which the nomenclature of zoology may be established on a uniform and permanent basis". Pp.: 105-121 in: Anonymous (ed.), Report of the twelfth meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Manchester, 1842). Manchester.
90. Stuessy, T. F. 1990. Plant taxonomy: the systematic evaluation of comparative data. New York.
91. _ 1997. Classification: more than just branching patterns of evolution. Aliso 15: 113-124.
92. Sundberg, P. & Pleijel, F. 1994. Phylogenetic classification and the definition of taxon names. Zool. Scripta 23: 19-25.
93. Swingle, W. T. 1893. Proceedings of the Botanical Club, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Madison Meeting. Bot. Gaz. 18: 342-349.
94. Sytsma, K. J. & Baum, D. A. 1996. Molecular phylogenies and the diversification of the angiosperms. Pp. 314-340 in: Taylor, D. W. & Hickey, L. J. (ed.), Flowering plant origin, evolution and phylogeny. New York.
95. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York.
96. Thorne, R. 1992. Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 58: 225-348.
97. Vilgalys, R. & Hibbett, D. S. 1993. Phylogenetic classification of fungi and our Linnaean heritage. Pp. 255-260 in: Reynolds, D. R. & Taylor, J. W. (ed.). The fungal holomorph and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics. Wallingford.
98. Weizen, P. C. van, 1997. Paraphyletic groups or what should a classification entail. Taxon 46: 99-103.
99. Wilbur, R. L. 1997. Calcaratolobelia (Campanulaceae) a new genus of spurred lobelioids from Mexico and Central America. Sida 17: 555-564.
100. Wyss, A. R. & Meng, J. 1997. Application of phylogenetic taxonomy to poorly resolved crown clades: a stem-modified node-based definition of Rodentia. Syst. Biol. 45: 559-568.