Fast and sensitive alignment of large genomic sequences

Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Bioinformatics Conference, CSB 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 138-147

  Brudno, M ^a   Morgenstern, B ^b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BIOINFORMATICS; CHAINS; GENES;

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL SITES; GENOME SEQUENCES; LARGE GENOMIC SEQUENCES; RAPID IDENTIFICATION; REGULATORY ELEMENTS; SEQUENCE SIMILARITY; TIME EFFICIENCIES;

ALIGNMENT;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME MAP; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA SEQUENCE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOUSE; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MICE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 18244404842     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSB.2002.1039337     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. A. Aho and M. Corasick. Efficient string matching: an aid to bibliographic search. Comm. ACM, 18:333-340, 1975.
2. S. F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E. M. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215:403-410, 1990.
3. V. Bafna and D. H. Huson. The conserved exon method for gene finding. In R. Altmann, T. Bailey, P. Bourne, M. Gribskov, T. Lengauer, I. Shindyalov, L. T. Eyck, and H. Weissig, editors, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, Menlo Parc, CA, 2000. AAAI Press.
4. S. Batzoglou, L. Pachter, J. P. Mesirov, B. Berger, and E. S. Lander. Human and mouse gene structure: comparative analysis and application to exon prediction. Genome Research, 10(7):950-958, 2000.
5. C. M. Bergman and M. Kreitman. Analysis of conserved noncoding dna in drosophila reveals similar constraints in intergenic and intronic sequences. Genome Research, 11:1335-1345, 2001.
6. M. Blanchette, B. Schwikowski, and M. Tompa. Algorithms for phylogenetic footprinting. Journal of Computational Biology, 9(2)211-23, 2002.
7. M. Blanchette and M. Tompa. Discovery of reguatory elements by a computational method for phylogenetic footprinting. Algorithms for phylogenetic footprinting. Genome Research, 12(5):739-48, 2002.
8. A. L. Delcher, S. Kasif, R. D. Fleischmann, J. Peterson, O. White, and S. L. Salzberg. Alignment of whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res, 27(11):2369-2376, 1999.
9. E. Fredkin. Trie memory. Comm. ACM, 3:490-500, 1960.
10. M. S. Gelfand, A. A. Mironov, and P. A. Pevzner. Gene recognition via spliced sequence alignment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93(17):9061-9066, 1996.
11. B. Göttgens, L. Barton, J. Gilbert, A. Bench, M. Sanchez, S. Bahn, S. Mistry, D. Grafham, A. McMurray, M. Vaudin, E. Amaya, D. Bentley, and A. Green. Analysis of vertebrate SCL loci identifies conserved enhancers. Nature Biotechnology, 18:181-186, 2000.
12. B. Göttgens, L. Barton, M. Chapman, A. Sinclair, B. Knudsen, D. Grafham, J. Gilbert, J. Rogers, D. Bentley, and A. Green. Transcriptional regulation of the Stem Cell Leukemia gene (SCL) Comparative analysis of five vertebrate SCL loci. Genome Research, 12:749-759, 2002.
13. B. Göttgens, J. Gilbert, L. Barton, D. Grafham, J. Rogers, D. Bentley, and A. Green. Long-range comparison of human and mouse SCL loci: localized regions of sensitivity to restriction endonucleases correspond precisely with peaks of conserved noncoding sequences. Genome Res., 11:87-97, 2001.
14. D. Gusfield. Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences: Computer Science and Computational Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997.
15. R. Hardison, J. L. Slightom, D. L. Gumucio, M. Goodman, N. Stojanovic, and W. Miller. Locus control regions of mammalian β-globin gene clusters: combining phylogenetic analyses and experimental results to gain functional insights. Gene, 205:73-94, 1998.
16. D. S. Hirschberg. A linear space algorithm for computing maximal common subsequences. Commun. ACM, 18:314-343, 1975.
17. N. Jareborg, E. Birney, and R. Durbin. Comparative analysis of noncoding regions of 77 orthologous mouse and human gene pairs. Genome Research, 9:815-824, 1999.
18. S. Karlin and S. F. Altschul. Applications and statistics for multiple high-scoring segments in molecular sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:5873-5877, 1993.
19. W. J. Kent and A. M. Zahler. Conservation, regulation, synteny, and introns in a large-scale C. briggsae-C. elegans genomic alignment. Genome Research, 10(8):1115-1125, 2000.
20. I. Korf, P. Flicek, D. Duan, and M. R. Brent. Integrating genomic homology into gene structure prediction. Bioinformatics, (17):S140-S148, 2001.
21. S. Kurtz, E. Ohlebusch, C. Schleiermacher, J. Stoye, and R. Giegerich. Computation and visualization of degenerate repeats in complete genomes. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, pages 228-238, Menlo Parc, CA, 2000. AAAI Press.
22. S. Kurtz and C. Schleiermacher. REPuter: Fast computation of maximal repeats in complete genomes. Bioinformatics, 15(5):426-427, 1999.
23. G. G. Loots, R. M. Locksley, C. M. Blankespoor, Z. E. Wang, W. Miller, E. M. Rubin, and K. A. Frazer. Identification of a coordinate regulator of interleukins 4, 13, and 5 by cross-species sequence comparisons. Science, 288(5463):136-140, 2000.
24. B. Morgenstern. DIALIGN 2: improvement of the segment-to-segment approach to multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics, 15:211-218, 1999.
25. B. Morgenstern. A simple and space-efficient fragment-chaining algorithm for alignment of DNA and protein sequences. Applied Mathematics Letters, 15:11-16, 2002.
26. B. Morgenstern, A. W. M. Dress, and T. Werner. Multiple DNA and protein sequence alignment based on segment-to-segment comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93:12098-12103, 1996.
27. B. Morgenstern, O. Rinner, S. Abdeddaïm, D. Haase, K. Mayer, A. Dress, and H.-W. Mewes. Exon discovery by genomic sequence alignment. Bioinformatics, in press.
28. W. R. Pearson and D. J.Lipman. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85:2444-2448, 1988.
29. W. Pugh. Skip lists: Skip lists: A probabilistic alternative to balanced trees. Comm ACM, 33:668-676, 1990.
30. O. Rinner and B. Morgenstern. AGenDA: Gene prediction by comparative sequence analysis. In Silico Biology, 2:0018, 2002
31. S. Schwartz, Z. Zhang, K. A. Frazer, A. Smit, C. Riemer, J. Bouck, R. Gibbs, R. Hardison, and W. Miller. PipMaker - a web server for aligning two genomic DNA sequences. Genome Research, 10:577-586, 2000.
32. J. Stoye. Multiple sequence alignment with the divide-and-conquer method. Gene, 211:GC45-GC56, 1998.
33. T. Wiehe, S. Gebauer-Jung, T. Mitchell-Olds, and R. Guigó. SGP-1: Prediction and validation of homologous genes based on sequence alignments. Genome Research, 11:1574-1583, 2001.