Reviewing Integrated Science and Mathematics: The Search for Evidence and Definitions From New Perspectives

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 101, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 259-268

  Hurley, Marlene M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SUPERIOR   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17744380049     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18028.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aikin, W. M. (1942). The story of the eight-year study: With conclusions and recommendations. New York: Harper & Brothers.
2. Allen, O. K. (1993). The relationship of interdisciplinary teaching to achievement and motivation in precalculus and physics. (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(8), 2930A.
3. Austin, J. D., Hirstein, J., & Walen, S. (1997). Integrated mathematics interfaced with science. School Science and Mathematics, 97(1), 45–49.
4. Ayers, J. B., & Mason, G. E. (1969). Differential effects of science: A process approach upon change in metropolitan readiness test scores among kindergarten children. The Reading Teacher, 22(5), 435–439.
5. Baker, G. D., Travers, R. M. W., Cassell, M., Eurich, A. C., Lorge, I., Rulon, P. J., Tyler, R., Wegner, F. R., Woods, E. L., & Wrightstone, J. W. (1941). New methods vs. old in American education. New York:Teachers College.
6. Ballard, P. D. (1981). The effect of interdisciplinary curricular materials in science and mathematics on student achievement, attitude, and attrition. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42(10), 4270 A.
7. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1986). A review of developments in meta-analytic method. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 388–399.
8. Barber, J. (2001). Great explorations in math and science (GEMS) [On-line]. Available:http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/ORAD/KAD/expert_panel/gems.html.
9. Berlin, D. F. (1989). The integration of science and mathematics education: Exploring the literature. School Science and Mathematics, 89, 73–80.
10. Berlin, D. F. (1990). Science and mathematics integration: Current status and future directions. School Science and Mathematics, 90(3), 254–257.
11. Berlin, D. F. (1991). A bibliography of integrated science and mathematics teaching and learning literature (Topics for Teachers Series No. 6). Columbus, OH:School Science and Mathematics Association.
12. Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (1992). NSF/SSMA wingspread conference: A network for integrated science and mathematics teaching and learning (Topics for Teachers Series No. 7). Columbus, OH:School Science and Mathematics Association.
13. Boris, S. P. (1976). A comparison of integrated and non-integrated science and mathematics instruction. Unpublished masters thesis, Florida Institute of Technology.
14. Bredderman, T. (1983). Effects of activity-based elementary science on student outcomes: A quantitative synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 499–518.
15. Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 15(2), 195–207.
16. Chamberlin, D., Chamberlin, E., Drought, N. E., & Scott, W. E. (1942). Did they succeed in college? The follow-up study of the graduates of the thirty schools. New York: Harper & Brothers.
17. Cifonelli, M. A. (1997). The effects an integrated mathematics and science class has on the problem solving ability of seventh grade students. Unpublished masters thesis, State University of New York, Oswego.
18. Clayton, J. P. (1989). Mathematics-science integration: The effects on achievement of ninth-grade physical science students. (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(2), 471A.
19. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistic power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillside, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Crates, G. H. (1994). Changes in curricula design and the effect on transfer of learning in developmental mathematics students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 55(07), 1859A. (University Microfilms No. AAC94–32194).
21. Czerniak, C. M., Weber, W. B., Sandmann, A., & Ahern, J. (1999). A literature review of science and mathematics integration. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 421–430.
22. Dugger, J., & Johnson, D. (1992). A comparison of principles of technology and high school physics student achievement using a principles of technology achievement test. Journal of Technology Education, 4(1), 19–26.
23. Dugger, J. C., & Meier, R. L. (1994). A comparison of second-year principles of technology and high school physics student achievement using a principles of technology achievement test. Journal of Technology Education, 5(2), 5–14.
24. Ernest, K. F. (1991). Effectiveness of an interdisciplinary team teaching organization on student achievement and student attitudes toward school in selected middle schools. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Idaho, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(07), 2492 A.
25. Friend, H. (1984). The effect of science and mathematics integration on selected seventh grade students' attitudes toward and achievement in science. New York:New York City Board of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 253 391).
26. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY:de Gruyter.
27. Gorman, F. H. (1943). An experiment in integrating seventh and eighth grade science and mathematics. Science Education, 43(4) 130–134.
28. Gray, W. L. (1970). The effects of an integrated learning sequence on the acquisition and retention of mathematics and science behaviors in grade five. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 1970). Dissertation Abstracts International, 31(05), 2004 A.
29. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.
30. Hedges, L. V., Shymansky, J. A., & Woodworth, G. (1989). A practical guide to modern methods of meta-analysis. Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association.
31. Huntley, M. A. (1998a). Design and implementation of a framework for defining integrated mathematics and science education. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 320–327.
32. Huntley, M. A. (1998b). Integrated mathematics and science education in the middle grades: Theory and practice. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(09), 3449 A.
33. Jacobs, H. H. (1989). The growing need for interdisciplinary curriculum content. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation (pp. 1–12). Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
34. Kermoade, A. L. (1972). The interdisciplinary approach and its comparative effectiveness. Seattle:Washington University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 064 238).
35. Kolb, J. R. (1967). Effects of relating mathematics to science instruction on the acquisition of quantitative science behaviors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 174–182.
36. Kolebas, P. (1971). The effects on the intelligence, reading, mathematics, and interest in science levels of third grade students who have participated in science-a process approach since first entering school. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, 1971). Dissertation Abstracts International, 32(08), 4443A.
37. Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (1998). 5 apples + 4 oranges =? School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 281–284.
38. Lonning, R. A., & DeFranco, T. C. (1997). Integration of science and mathematics: A theoretical model. School Science and Mathematics, 97(4), 212–215.
39. Lorge, I. (1942, May). Curriculum evaluation: Bronx high school of science. High Points, 24, 27–37.
40. Mason, T. C. (1996). Integrated curricula: Potential and problems. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 263–270.
41. McCliman, R. D. (1995). The effect of two instructional methodologies of interdisciplinary and traditional schedules and gender on the academic achievement of ninth graders. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(3), 883A. (University Microfilms No. AAC 95–22599).
42. McGonagill, B. K. (1995). Defining, developing, and modeling interdisciplinary curriculum. (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(06), 2100 A.
43. Mickelson, J. M. (1957, Summer). What does research say about the effectiveness of the core curriculum? The School Review, 144–160.
44. Noto, E. R. (1972). A comparison between traditional teaching and interdisciplinary team teaching at the seventh grade level. (Doctoral dissertation, St. Louis University, 1972). Dissertation Abstracts International, 33(03), 905A.
45. O'Neal, E. N. (1995). An evaluation of an interdisciplinary science course designed to help at-risk students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(8), 3071A. (University Microfilms No. AAC 95–43130).
46. Pang, J. S., & Good, R. (2000). A review of the integration of science and mathematics: Implications for further research. School Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 73–82.
47. Sandler, B. (1961). A comparison of an integrated course in college physics and mathematics of one semester duration with separate courses in the two subjects in a two-year community college. (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1961). Dissertation Abstracts International, 22(12), 4295A.
48. Scarborough, J. D., & White, C. (1994). Phys-ma-tech: An integrated partnership. Journal of Technology Education [On-line], 5(2). Available:http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/jte-v5n2/scarborough.jte-v5n2.html.
49. Schwartz, B. (1958). An investigation of the effects of a seventh and eighth grade core program on pupil progress in selected areas in senior high school. (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1958). Dissertation Abstracts International, 20(02), 608A.
50. Shann, M. H. (1975a). An evaluation of unified science and mathematics for elementary schools (USMES) during the 1973–74 school year. Boston, MA:Boston University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 135 861).
51. Shann, M. (1975b). Student effects of an interdisciplinary curriculum for real problem solving: The 1974–75 USMES evaluation final report. Boston, MA:Boston University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 135 864).
52. St. Claire, B., & Hough, D. L. (1992). Interdisciplinary teaching: A review of the literature. Springfield, MO:Southwest Missouri State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 373 056).
53. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
54. Trezise, K. A. (19951996). An integrated curriculum in mathematics: An investigation of student achievement. (Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(10), 3834A.
55. Turner, P. D. (1997, March). Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (Educational Reproduction Service No. ED 412 231).
56. Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago, IL:Rand McNally.
57. Wrightstone, J. W. (1935). Appraisal of newer practices in selected public schools. New York: Teachers College.
58. Wrightstone, J. W. (1936). Appraisal of experimental high school practices. New York: Teachers College.
59. Wrightstone, J. W. (1947). Evaluating the effectiveness of an integrated ninth grade curriculum. Teachers College Journal, 19(2), 2–3, 12.
60. Wrightstone, J. W., & Forlano, G. (1948, December). Evaluation of the experience curriculum at Midwood high school. High Points, 30, 35–42.
61. Wrightstone, J. W., & Forlano, G. (1959). An evaluation of the core program in selected seventh and eighth grade classes. New York: Teachers College.