Interobserver variability in the interpretation of renal digital subtraction angiography

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 173, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 1285-1288

  Paul, Jean François ^a   Cherrak, Ilhem ^a   Jaulent, Marie Christine ^a   Chatellier, Gilles ^a   Plouin, Pierre François ^a   Degoulet, Patrice ^a   Gaux, Jean Claude ^a  

^a HÔPITAL BROUSSAIS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; ATHEROMATOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; STANDARD;

EID: 0032746244     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.5.10541106     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Owen W. Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms. Circulation 1977;55:324-328
2. Gagne PJ, Matchett J, MacFarland D, Hauer-Jensen M, Eidt JF, Barnes RW. Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial? J Vasc Surg 1996;24:449-455
3. Haase J, Escaned J, van Swijndregt EM, et al. Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (CAAS II). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;30:104-114
4. Hausleiter J, Jost S, Nolte CW, et al. Comparative in-vitro validation of eight first-and second-generation quantitative coronary angiography systems. Coron Artery Dis 1997;8:83-90
5. de Vries AR, Engels PH, Overtoom TT, Saltzherr TP, Geyskes BG. Interobserver variability in assessing renal artery stenosis by digital subtraction angiography. Diagn Imaging Clin Med 1984;53:277-281
6. Textor SC. Revascularization in atherosclerotic renal artery disease. Kidney Int 1998;53:799-811
7. Plouin PF, Darne B, Chatellier G, et al. Restenosis after a first percutaneous transluminal renal angio-plasty. Hypertension 1993;21:89-96
8. Reiber JH, Cornells JK, Comelis JS, et al. Coronary artery dimensions from cine angiograms: methodology and validation of a computer assisted analysis procedure. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1984;3:131-141
9. Plouin PF, Chatellier G, Darné G, Raynaud A. Blood pressure outcome of angioplasty in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a randomized trial. Hypertension 1998;31:823-829
10. Bland J, Altman D. Measurement error. BMJ 1996;313:744-753
11. Fleiss JL, Cohen J, Everitt BS. Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. Psychol Bull 1969;72:323-327
12. Bland M, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986;1:307-310
13. Beauman GJ, Vogel RA. Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms: implications for clinical decisions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:108-113
14. Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Sharpe BL, Bamett HJ. Carotid artery stenosis: external validity of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial measurement method. Radiology 1997;204:229-233
15. SanMarco ME, Brooks SH, Blankenhorn DH. Reproducibility of a consensus panel in the interpretation of coronary angiograms. Am Heart J 1978;96: 430-437