Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: Digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography

Radiology

Volumn 202, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 333-338

  Wasser, Martin N ^a   Westenberg, Jos ^a   Van Der Hulst, Victor P M ^a   Van Baalen, Jari ^a   Van Bockel, J Hajo ^a   Van Erkel, Arian R ^a   Pattynama, Peter M T ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Angiography, comparative studies; Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies; Magnetic resonance (MR), phase imaging; Magnetic resonance (MR), three dimensional; Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies; Renal arteries, MR; Renal arteries, stenosis or obstruction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY ARTERIOGRAPHY; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031024013     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015052     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Debatin FJ, Spritzer CE, Grist TM, et al. Imaging of the renal arteries: value of MR angiography. AJR 1991; 157:981-990.
2. Meyers SP, Talaga SL, Totterman S, et al. Evaluation of the renal arteries in kidney donors: value of three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography with maximal-intensity-projection or surface rendering. AJR 1995; 164:117-121.
3. Richter CS, Krestin GP, Eichenberger AC, Schöpke W, Fuchs WA. Assessment of renal artery stenosis by phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol 1993; 3:493-498.
4. De Haan MW, Kouwenhoven M, Thelissen GRP, et al. Renovascular disease in patients with hypertension: detection with systolic and diastolic gating in three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1996; 198:449-456.
5. Kent KC, Edelman RR, Kim D, Steinman TI, Porter DH, Skillman JJ. Magnetic resonance imaging: a reliable test for the evaluation of proximal atherosclerotic renal arterial stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1991; 13:311-318.
6. Gibson M, Cook G, Gedroyc WM. Case report: renal transplant artery stenosis -three cases where magnetic resonance angiography was superior to conventional arteriography. Br J Radiol 1995; 68:89-92.
7. Wasser MN, Geelkerken RH, Kouwenhoven M, et al. Systolically gated 3D phase contrast MRA of mesenteric arteries in suspected mesenteric ischemia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:262-268.
8. Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Pettigrew RI. Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in stenotic vessels. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 193-199.
9. Nahman NS, Maniam P, Hernandez RA, et al. Renal artery pressure gradients in patients with angiographic evidence of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24:695-699.
10. Nayler GL, Firmin DN, Longmore DB. Blood flow imaging by cine magnetic resonance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986; 10: 715-722.
11. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995; 197:785-792.