The biophysical foundations of the localisation of encephalogram generators in the brain. The application of a distribution-type model to the localisation of epileptic foci;Bases biofísicas de la localización de los generadores cerebrales del electroencefalograma. Aplicación de un modelo de tipo distribuido a la localización de focos epilépticos

Revista de Neurologia

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 748-756

  Grave De Peralta, R ^a,b   Gonzalez Andino S ^a   Gómez González, Carlos M ^b,c  

^a University Hospital   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^c Depto de Psicol Experimental   (Spain)

Author keywords

Brain source localization; Dipolar models; Distributed solutions; EEG; EPIFOCUS; Epileptic focus localization; Inverse problem; LAURA

Indexed keywords

BIOPHYSICS; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN RADIOGRAPHY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EPILEPSY; GENERATOR; HUMAN; MODEL; REVIEW;

EID: 17644367214     PISSN: 02100010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33588/rn.3908.2004038     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Pastor J. Fundamentos biofísicos de la actividad neuronal. Rev Neurol 2000; 30: 741-55.
2. Lorente de Nó R. A study of nerve physiology. Studies from the Rockfeller Institute. Vol 132. Ch 16. New York: Rockefeller Institute; 1947.
3. Delgado-García JM, Vidal PP, Gómez CM, Berthoz A. A neurophysiological study of prepossitus hypoglossi neurons projecting to oculomotor and preoculomotor nuclei in the alert cat. Neurosci 1989; 29: 291-307.
4. Plonsey R. The nature of the sources of bioelectric and biomagnetic fields. Biophys J 1982; 39: 309-12.
5. Hamalainen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi J, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV. MEG: Theory, instrumentation and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Review Modern Physics 1993; 65: 413-97.
6. Pruis GW, Gilding BH, Peters MJ. A comparison of different numerical methods for solving the forward problem in EEG and MEG. Physiol Meas 1993; 14: 1-9.
7. Miller CE, Henríquez CS. Finite element analysis of bioelectric phenomena. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1990; 18: 207-33.
8. Barnard ACL, Duck IM, Lynn MS, Timlake WT. The application of electromagnetic theory to electrocardiology II. Numerical solution to integral equations. Biophys J 1966; 7: 463-91.
9. Gonzalez SL, Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, Biscay R, Jiménez JC, Pascual RD, Lemagne J. Projective methods for the magnetic direct problem. Advances in biomagnetism. New York: Plenum Press; 1989.
10. Vanrumste B, Van Hoey G, Van de Walle R, D'Havé MI, Lemahieu P, Boon P. The validation of the finite difference method and reciprocity for solving the inverse problem in EEG dipole source analysis. Brain Topogr 2001; 14: 83-92.
11. Ary JP, Klein SA, Fender DH. Location of sources of evoked scalp potentials: corrections for skull and scalp thickness. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1981; 28: 447-52.
12. Zhang Z, Jewett DL. Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 88: 1-11.
13. Berg P, Scherg M. A fast method for forward computation of multiple-shell spherical head models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 90: 58-64.
14. de Munck JC, Peters MJ. A fast method to compute the potential in the multisphere model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993; 40: 1166-74.
15. de Munck JC. The potential distribution in a layered anisotropic spheroidal volume conductor. J Appl Phys 1988; 64: 461-70.
16. Zhang Z. A fast method to compute surface potentials generated by dipoles within multilayer anisotropic spheres. Phys Med Biol 1995; 40: 335-49.
17. Huang MX, Mosher JC, Leahy RM. A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44: 423-40.
18. Ermer JJ, Mosher JC, Baillet S, Leah RM. Rapidly recomputable EEG forward models for realistic head shapes. Phys Med Biol 2001; 46: 1265-81.
19. Spinelli L, González-Andino S, Lantz G, Seeck M, Michel CM. Electromagnetic inverse solutions in anatomically constrained spherical head models. Brain Topogr 2000; 13: 115-25.
20. Michel CM, Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, Lantz G, González S, Spinelli L, Blanke O, et al. Spatio-temporal EEG analysis and distributed source estimation in presurgical epilepsy evaluation. J Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 16: 239-66.
21. Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, Gonzalez SL. Single dipole localization: Some numerical aspects and a practical rejection criterion for the fitted parameters. Brain Topogr 1994; 6: 277-82.
22. Achim A, Richer F, Saint-Hilaire JM. Methodological considerations for the evaluation of spatio-temporal source models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 79: 227-40.
23. Miltner W, Braun C, Johnson R Jr, Simpson GV, Ruchkin DS. A test of brain electrical source analysis (BESA): a simulation study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 91: 295-310.
24. Cabrera-Fernández D, Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, González-Andino SL. Some limitations of spatio-temporal source models. Brain Topogr 1995; 7: 87-93.
25. Mosher JC, Lewis PS, Leahy RM. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992; 39: 541-57.
26. Scherg M, Von Cramon D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 1986; 65: 344-60.
27. Sekihara K, Nagarajan S, Poeppel D, Miyashita Y. Time-frequency MEG-MUSIC algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999; 18: 92-7.
28. Mosher JC, Leahy RM. Recursive MUSIC: a framework for EEG and MEG source localization. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998; 45: 1342-54.
29. Snyder AZ. Dipole source localization in the study of EP generators: a critique. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 80: 321-5.
30. Alarcón G, Guy CN, Binnie CD, Walker SR, Elwes RD, Polkey CE. Intracerebral propagation of interictal activity in partial epilepsy: implications for source localisation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57: 435-49.
31. Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, González-Andino SL. A critical analysis of linear inverse solutions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998; 45: 440-8.
32. He B, Lian J. High-resolution spatio-temporal functional neuroimaging of brain activity. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2002; 30: 283-306.
33. Hämäläinen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain-minimum norm estimates. Med Biol Eng Comput 1994; 32: 35-42.
34. Lawson CL, Hanson RJ. Solving least squares problems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1974.
35. Greenblatt RE. Probabilistic reconstruction of multiple sources in the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem. Inverse Problems 1993; 9: 271-84.
36. Fuchs M, Wischmann HA, Wagner M. Generalized minimum norm least squares reconstruction algorithms. ISBET Newsletter 1994; 5: 8-11.
37. Golberg MA. Solution methods for integral equations. New York: Plenum Press; 1978.
38. Groetch CW. The theory of Tikhonov regularization for Fredholm equations of the first kind. Boston: Pitman; 1984.
39. Parker RL. Geophysical inverse theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994.
40. Hämäläinen M. Discrete and distributed source estimates. ISBET Newsletter 1995; 6: 9-12.
41. Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, Gonzalez SL. Discussing the capabilities of laplacian minimization. Brain Topogr 2000; 13: 97-104.
42. Van Veen BD, van Dronglen W, Yuchtman M, Suzuki A. Localization of brain electric activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997; 44: 867-80.
43. Gross J, Kujala J, Hämäläinen M, Timmermann L, Schnitzler A, Salmelin R. Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98: 694-9.
44. Robinson SE, Vrba J. Functional neuroimaging by synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM). In Yoshimoto T, Kotani M, Kuriki S, Karibe H, Nakasoto N, eds. recent advances in biomagnetism. Senai: Tohoku University Press; 1999. p. 302-5.
45. Hauk O, Keil A, Elbert T, Müller MM. Comparison of data transformation procedures to enhance topographical accuracy in time-series analysis of the human EEG. J Neurosci Methods 2002; 113: 111-22.
46. Vrba J, Robinson SE. Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. Methods 2001; 25: 249-71.
47. Barnes GR, Hillebrand A. Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images. Hum Brain Mapp 2003; 18: 1-12.
48. Lütkenhöner B, Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R. The resolution field concept. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 102: 326-34.
49. Dale AM, Sereno MI. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cogn Neurosci 1993; 5: 162-76.
50. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Köhler T, Wischmann HA. Linear and nonlinear current density reconstructions. J Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 16: 267-95.
51. Phillips C, Rugg MD, Friston KJ. Anatomically informed basis functions for EEG source localization: combining functional and anatomical constraints. NeuroImage 2002; 16: 678-95.
52. Babiloni F, Babiloni C, Carducci C, Romani GL, Rossini PM, Angelone LM, et al. Multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging data: a simulation study. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 1-15.
53. Liu AK, Dale AM, Belliveau JW. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 16: 47-62.
54. Schmidt DM, George JS, Wood CC. Bayesian inference applied to the electromagnetic inverse problem. Hum Brain Mapp 1999; 7: 195-212.
55. Phillips JW, Leahy RM, Mosher JC. MEG-based imaging of focal neuronal current sources. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16: 338-48.
56. Baillet S, Garnero L. A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomofunctional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997; 44: 374-85.
57. Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, González-Andino SL, Morand S, Michel CM, Landis T. Imaging the electrical activity of the brain: ELECTRA. Hum Brain Mapp 2000; 9: 1-12.
58. Ripley BD. Spatial statistics. New York: Wiley; 1981.
59. Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, Murray MM, Michel CM, Martuzzi R, González-Andino SL. Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints. Neuroimage 2004; 21: 527-39.
60. González-Andino SL, Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, Lantz CM, Blank O, Michel CM, Landis T. Non-stationary distributed source approximation: an alternative to improve localization procedures. Hum Brain Mapp 2001; 14: 81-95.
61. Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, Gonzalez SL, Lantz G, Michel CM, Landis T. Noninvasive localization of electromagnetic epileptic activity. I. Method descriptions and simulations. Brain Topogr 2001; 14: 131-7.
62. Lantz G, Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, González S, Michel CM. Noninvasive localization of electromagnetic epileptic activity. II. Demonstration of sublobar accuracy in patients with simultaneous surface and depth recordings. Brain Topogr 2001; 14: 139-47.
63. Lantz G, Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Michel CM. Epileptic source localization with high density EEG: how many electrodes are needed? Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114: 63-9.
64. Grave de Peralta-Menéndez R, González-Andino S. Comparison of algorithms for the localization of focal sources: Evaluation with simulated data and analysis of experimental data. International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism 2002. URL: http://www.ijbem.org/volume4/ number1/Articles/Menendez/index.htm.
65. Michel CM, Lantz G, Spinelli L, Grave de Peralta R, Landis T, Seeck M. 128-channel EEG source imaging in epilepsy: clinical yield and localization precision. J Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 21: 71-83.
66. Menéndez-de la Prida L, Sola RG, Pozo MA. Aspectos neurofisiológicos in vivo e in vitro de la epilepsia. Rev Neurol 2002; 34: 430-7.
67. Pastor JR, García-Sola R. Fundamentos biofísicos de la magnetoencefalografía. Rev Neurol 2002; 34: 843-50.