Bayesian inference applied to the electromagnetic inverse problem

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 195-212

  Schmidt, David M ^a   George, John S ^a   Wood, C C ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomagnetic; Brain mapping; EEG; Inverse problem; MEG; Monte Carlo; MRI

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NEUROANATOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 0032901789     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:3<195::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-F     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ahonen AI, Hämäläinen MS, Kajola MJ, Knuutila JET, Laine PP, Lounasmaa OV, Parkkonen LT, Simola JT, Tesche CD. 1993. 122-channel SQUID instrument for investigating the magnetic signals from the human brain. Physica Scripta T49A:198-205.
2. Aine CJ. 1995. A conceptual overview and critique of functional neuroimaging techniques in humans: I. MRI/fMRI and PET. Critical Reviews Neurobiol 9:229-309.
3. Aine C, Supek S, George J, Ranken D, Lewine J, Sanders J, Best E, Tiee W, Flynn E, Wood C. 1996. Retinotopic organization of human visual cortex: departures from the classical model. Cerebral Cortex 6:354-361.
4. Aine C, Chen HW, Ranken D, Mosher J, Best E, George J, Lewine J, Paulson K. 1997a. An examination of chromatic/achromatic stimuli presented to central/peripheral visual fields: an MEG study. Neuroimage 5:153.
5. Aine C, Schlitt H, Shah J, Ranken D, Krause B, George J, Müller-Gärtner HW. 1997b. MEG/fMRI differentiates between ventral/ dorsal processing streams. Soc Neurosci 23:1312.
6. Allison T, Wood CC, McCarthy G. 1986. The central nervous system. In: Donchin E, Porges S, Coles M, editors. Psychophysiology: systems, processes and applications: a handbook. New York: Guilford, p 5-25.
7. Baillet S, Garnero L. 1997. A bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44:374-385.
8. Belliveau J. 1997. Dynamic human brain mapping using combined fMRI, EEG and MEG. Presentation to the symposium on approaches to cognitive neuroscience by means of functional brain imaging, Caen, France.
9. Bernardo JM, Smith AFM. 1994. Bayesian theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Dale AM, Sereno MI. 1993. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cognitive Neurosci 5:162-176.
11. Dale AM. 1997. Strategies and limitations in integrating brain imaging and electromagnetic recording. Soc Neurosci Abstr, 23:1.
12. Efron B. 1986. Why isn't everyone a Bayesian? Am Statistician 40:1-5; commentary 5-11.
13. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. 1995. Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
14. George JS, Aine CJ, Mosher JC, Schmidt DM, Ranken DM, Schlitt HA, Wood CC, Lewine JD, Sanders JA, Belliveau JW. 1995. Mapping function in the human brain with MEG, anatomical MRI, and functional MRI. J Clin Neurophys 12:406-431.
15. Gorodnitsky IF, George JS, Rao BD. 1995. Neuromagnetic source imaging with FOCUSS: a recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 95:231-251.
16. Hämäläinen M, Ilmoniemi R. 1984. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: estimates of current distributions. Technical Report TKK-F-A559, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland.
17. Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV. 1993. Magnetoencephalography - theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 65:413-497.
18. Horton JC, Hoyt WF. 1991. The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. Proc Roy Soc London 132:348-361.
19. Kavanaugh RN, Darcey TM, Lehmanh D, Fender DH. 1978. Evaluation of methods for three-dimensional localization of electrical sources in the human brain. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 25:421-429.
20. Mitzdorf U. 1985. Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral-cortex: investigation of evoked-potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiological Rev 65:37-100.
21. Mosher JC, Lewis PS, Leahy RM. 1992. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 39:541-557.
22. Nunez P. 1981. Electrical fields of the brain: neurophysics of the EEG. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Okada YC, Papuashvili N, Xu C. 1998. Maximum current dipole moment density as an important physiological constraint in MEG inverse solutions. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Biomagnetism.
24. Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D. 1994. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity of the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 18:49-65.
25. Phillips JW, Leahy RM, Mosher JC. 1997. MEG-based imaging of focal neuronal current sources. IEEE Trans Med Imag 16:338-348.
26. Ranken DM, George JS. 1993. MRIVIEW: an interactive computational tool for investigation of brain structure and function. Visualization '93, p. 324-331, IEEE Computer Society.
27. Sarvas J. 1987. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 32:11-22.
28. Scherg M, von Cramon D. 1986. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 65:344-360.
29. Sereno MI, Dale AM, Reppas JB, Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Brady TJ, Rosen BR, Tootell RBH. 1995. Borders of multiple visual areas in human revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 268:889-893.
30. Shah NJ, Aine C, Schlitt H, Krause BJ, Ranken D, George J, Müller-Gärtner HW. 1998. Activation of the ventral stream in humans: an fMRI study. In: Gulyas B, Müller-Gärtner HW, editors. Positron emission tomography: a critical assessment of recent trends. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
31. Toga AW, Mazziotta JC. 1996. Brain mapping: the methods. New York: Academic Press.
32. von Helmholtz H. 1853. Ueber einige gesetze der vertheilung elektrischer strome in korperlichen leitern, mit anwendung auf die thierisch-elektrischen versuche. Ann Phys Chem 89:211-233, 353-377.
33. Wang JZ, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L. 1992. Magnetic source images determined by a lead-field analysis: the unique minimum-norm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 39:665-675.