A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 423-440

  Huang, M X ^a,b   Mosher, J C ^c   Leahy, R M ^d  

^a USAF/VA New Mexico Region   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; HEAD; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NERVE CONDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALP; SENSOR;

BRAIN; HEAD; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PHANTOMS, IMAGING;

EID: 0032957150     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/2/010     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cuffin B N 1990 Effects of head shapes on EEGs and MEGs IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37 15-22
2. Ferguson A S, Zhang X and Stroink G 1994 A complete linear discretization for calculating the magnetic field using the boundary element method IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 41 455-9
3. Geselowitz D B 1967 On bioelectric potentials in an inhomogeneous volume conductor Biophys. J. 7 1-11
4. _1970 On the magnetic field generated outside an inhomogeneous volume conductor by internal volume currents IEEE Trans. Magn. 6 346-7
5. Golub G H and Van Loan C F 1984 Matrix Computations 2nd edn (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press)
6. Hämäläinen M S and Sarvas J 1989 Realistic conductor geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36 165-71
7. Huang M, Aine C J, Supek S, Best E, Ranken D and Flynn E R 1998 Multi-start downhill simplex method for spatio-temporal source localization in magnetoencephalography Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. Evoked Potentials 108 32-44
8. Ilmoniemi R J, Hämäläinen M S and Knuutila J 1985 The forward and inverse problems in the spherical model Biomagnetism: Applications and Theory ed H Weinberg, G Stroink and T Katila (New York: Pergamon) pp 278-82
9. Leahy R M, Mosher J C, Spencer M E, Huang M X and Lewine J D 1998 A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 107 159-73
10. Meijs J W H, Bosch F G C, Peters M J and Lopes da Silva F H 1987 On the magnetic field distribution generated by a dipolar current source situated in a realistically shaped compartment model of the head Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 66 286-98
11. Mosher J C, Leahy R M and Lewis P S 1999 EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. at press
12. Mosher J C, Lewis P S and Leahy R M 1992 Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39 541-57
13. Mosher J C, Spencer M E, Leahy R M and Lewis P S 1993 Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 86 303-21
14. Nelder J A and Mead R 1965 A simplex method for function minimization Comput. J. 7 308-13
15. Ranken D and George J 1993 MRIVIEW: an interactive computational tool for investigation of brain structure and function Proc. IEEE Visualization '93 (Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press) pp 324-31
16. Sarvas J 1987 Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the bio-magnetic inverse problems Phys. Med. Biol. 32 11-22
17. Schlitt H, Heller L, Aaron R, Best E and Ranken D 1995 Evaluation of boundary element method for the EEG forward problem: effect of linear interpolation IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 42 52-8
18. Schlitt H, Heller L, Best E, Ranken D and Aaron R 1994 Effect of conductor geometry on source localization: implications for epilepsy studies North American Biomagnetism Action Group (Detroit, MI, 15-17 April 1994) (Los Alamos Technical Report LAUR-94-1446)