Metrological feasibilities of CMM touch trigger probes. Part I: 3D theoretical model of probe pretravel

Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 273-286

  Wozniak A ^a   Dobosz, M ^a  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Coordinate measuring machines; Dimensional metrology; Measurement; One stage and two stage probes; Probing accuracy; Touch trigger probes

Indexed keywords

COORDINATE MEASURING MACHINES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SPRINGS (COMPONENTS); SURFACE PROPERTIES;

TOUCH TRIGGER PROBES;

MEASUREMENT THEORY;

EID: 17144434377     PISSN: 02632241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2003.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Butler C. An investigation into the performance of probes on coordinate measuring machines. Ind. Metrol. 2(1):1991;59-70.
2. Cauchick-Miguel P.A., King T.G. Factors which influence CMM touch trigger probe performance. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 38(4):1998;363-374.
3. Chan F.et al. Some performance characteristics of a multi-axis touch trigger probe. Meas. Sci. Technol. 8:1997;837-848.
4. J.V. Krejci, CMM measurement enhancement using probe compensation algorithms. SME Technical Paper MS90-09, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1990.
5. Mayer J.R., Ghazzar A., Rossy O. 3D characterisation, modelling and compensation of the pre-travel of a kinematic touch trigger probe. Measurement. 19(2):1996;83-94.
6. Miguel Cauchick P.et al. A review on methods for probe performance verification. Measurement. 23(1):1998;15-33.
7. L. Nawara, J. Sadek, Investigation of measuring heads errors influence on the measuring accuracy of multi-coordinate machine, in: 7th Int. Conf. on Automated Inspection and Product Control Birmingham, England 1985.
8. C. Reid, Performance characteristics of touch trigger probes. CMM News, NPL (1), Teddington, Autumn 1992.
9. Roland P., Johnsonet al. Dynamic error characteristics of touch trigger probes fitted to coordinate measuring machines. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 47(5):1998;1168-1172.
10. ANSI/ASME B89.1.12M, Methods for Performance Evaluation of Coordinate Measuring Machines, American Society for Mechanical Engineering, New York, 1990.
11. BS 6808, Coordinate Measuring Machines, Part 3: Code of Practice, British Standards Association, 1989.
12. ISO 10360-2, Coordinate metrology, Parts 1-6, ISO, Switzerland, 1994.
13. VDI/VDE 2617, Accuracy of Coordinate Measuring Machines, Part 3, Dusseldorf, 1989.
14. M. Burdekin et al., Calibration software and application to coordinate measuring machines, in: Conf. Proceedings on Software for Coordinate Measuring Machines, NPL, Teddington, 1-7 September 1985.
15. Dobosz M., Ratajczyk E. Interference probe head for coordinate measuring machines. Measurement. 14:1994;117-123.
16. H. Harary et al., A new method for the characterization of analogue probes. IPES, Monterey, CA, September 1989, 155-157.
17. Estler Tyler W.et al. Error compensation for CMM touch trigger probes. Precision Eng. 19:1996;85-97.
18. Estler Tyler W.et al. Practical aspects of touch-trigger probe error compensation. Precision Eng. 21:1997;1-17.
19. Osiński Z. General Mechanics. 2000;PWN, Warsaw. (in Polish).