Factors which influence CMM touch trigger probe performance

International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 363-374

  Cauchick Miguel, P A ^a   King, T G ^b  

^a METHODIST UNIVERSITY OF PIRACICABA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; KINEMATICS;

COORDINATE MEASURING MACHINES (CMM); TOUCH TRIGGER PROBES;

PROBES;

EID: 0032043546     PISSN: 08906955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00054-0     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Oakes, S., CMM Probing Technology. Internal Report from the CMM Product Group, Renishaw Metrology Ltd., Wotton-under-Edge, U.K., 1993.
2. Miguel, P. A. C. and King, T. G., Assessing CMM touch trigger performance. Submitted to Journal of the Brazilian Society for Mechanical Science.
3. Butler, C., An investigation into the performance of probes on coordinate measuring machines. Ind. Metrology, 1991, 2(1), 59-70.
4. Phillips, S. D., Borchardt, B. and Caskey, G., Measurement uncertainty considerations for coordinate measuring machines. NISTIR-5170, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1993.
5. Phillips, S. D., Performance evaluations. In Coordinate Measuring Machines and Systems. Marcel Decker, Inc., New York, 1995, pp. 137-226.
6. Estler, W. T., Phillips, S. D., Borchardt, B., Hopp, T., Witzgall, C., Levenson, M., Eberhardt, K. and MacClain, M., Error compensation for CMM touch trigger probes. Proc. ASPE Annual Meeting, 1995, 12, 428-430.
7. Reid, C., Performance characteristics of touch trigger probes. CMM News, NPL, Issue 1, Teddington, U.K., 1992.
8. Lotze, W., Prufkorper für Mehrkoordinaten-Messgerate. Feingeratetechnik, 1981, 4, 154-156.
9. Nawara, L. and Kowalski, M., Assessing the metrological properties of measuring heads for multicoordinate measuring machines. In Proc. Int Symposium on Metrology for Quality Control in Production, Tokyo, 1984, pp. 300-305.
10. Nawara, L. and Sladek, J., Investigation of measuring head errors influence on the measuring accuracy of a multi-coordinate machine. In Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Automated Inspection and Product Control, Birmingham, 1985, pp. 305-312.
11. Chan, M., Performance verification of mistral CMM. Proc. 1st Annual Symposium of Postgraduate Research, School of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, 1995.
12. Davis, E. J., Liao, W. J., Scott, G. F. and Sout, K. J., Sources of measurement uncertainty when using coordinate measuring machines: A top-down systematic approach. In Proc. 2nd Laser Metrology and Machine Performance Conf., Southampton, 1995, pp. 185-201.
13. Liao, W. J., Davis, E. J., Scott, G. F. and Sout, K. J., Parameter design approach to quantify and reduce measurement uncertainty when using coordinate measuring machines: Effect of probing parameters. In Proc. 2nd Laser Metrology and Machine Performance Conf., Southampton, 1995, pp. 213-223.
14. ISO 10360-2, Coordinate Metrology, Part 2: Performance Assessment of Coordinate Measuring Machines. International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland, 1994.
15. VDI/VDE 2617, Accuracy of Coordinate Measuring Machines, Characteristics Parameters and their Checking. Part 3: Components of Measurement Deviation of the Machine. Dusseldorf, 1989.
16. ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland, 1993.
17. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G., Statistical Methods. The Iowa State University Press, Iowa, 1980.