A review on methods for probe performance verification

Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 15-33

  Miguel, Paulo Cauchick ^a   King, Tim ^b   Abackerli, Álvaro ^a  

^a METHODIST UNIVERSITY OF PIRACICABA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CMM standards; Probe performance verification; Touch trigger probe

Indexed keywords

INSTRUMENT TESTING; PROBES; STANDARDS;

PROBE TESTING; TOUCH TRIGGER PROBES;

MEASUREMENT THEORY;

EID: 0031653167     PISSN: 02632241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0263-2241(98)00006-2     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ANSI/ASME B89.1.12M, Methods for Performance Evaluation of Coordinate Measuring Machines, American Society for Mechanical Engineering, New York, 1990.
2. VDI/VDE 2617, Accuracy of Coordinate Measuring Machines, Part 3, Dusseldorf, 1989.
3. ISO 10360-2, Coordinate Metrology, Parts 1-6, ISO, Switzerland, 1994.
4. BS 6808, Coordinate Measuring Machines, Part 3: Code of Practice, British Standards Association, 1989.
5. WECC Technical Guideline, Coordinate Measuring Machine Calibration, Western European Calibration Corporation, September 1993.
6. W. Lotze, Prufkorper fur Mehrkoordinaten-Messgerate, Feingeratetechnik, No. 4, January 1981, pp. 154-156.
7. J. Lu, N.A. Duffie, J.G. Bollinger, Two dimensional tracing and measurement using touch trigger probes, Annals of the CIRP 30 (1982) 415-419.
8. [ 8 ] L. Nawara, M. Kowalski, Assessing the metrological properties of measuring heads for multicoordinate measuring machines. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Metrology for Quality Control in Production, Tokyo, 1984, pp. 300-305.
9. L. Nawara, M. Kowalski, The investigations on selected dynamical phenomena in the heads of multi-coordinate measuring devices, Annals of the CIRP, 1984, 33/1, pp. 373-375.
10. L. Nawara, J. Sladek, Investigation of measuring head errors influence on the measuring accuracy of a multi-coordinate machine. In: 7th International Conference on Automated Inspection and Product Control, Birmingham, 1985, pp. 305-312.
11. M. Burdekin, B. Di Giacomo, Z. Xijing, Calibration software and application to coordinate measuring machines. In: Conference Proceedings on Software for Coordinate Measuring Machines, NPL, Teddington, September 1985, pp. 1-7.
12. H. Harary, P. Creimeas, P. Chollet, A. Clement, A New Method for the Characterization of Analogue Probes. IPES, Monterey, CA, September 1989, pp. 155-157.
13. H. Aoyama, M. Kawai, T. Kishinami, A new method for detecting the contact point between a touch probe and a surface, Annals of the CIRP 38 (1989) 517-520.
14. A. Traylor, T. Jarman, Performance characteristics of touch trigger probes. SME Technical Paper MS90-266, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1990.
15. J.V. Krejci, CMM measurement enhancement using probe compensation algorithms. SME Technical Paper MS90-09, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1990.
16. C. Butler, I. Shams, Precision coordinate measrement using a fibre optic touch probe. In: 28th International MATADOR Conference, Manchester, 1990, pp. 477-480.
17. C. Butler, An investigation into the performance of probes on coordinate measuring machines, Industrial Metrology 2 (1) (1991) 59-70.
18. Waldele, F., Fundamentals of coordinate metrology. In: Tutorial of 6th International Precision Engineering Semi-nar, Braunschweig, Germany, 1991.
19. G. Scott, P. Rawlings, E.J. Davis, J. Brindley, Coordinate measuring machine accuracy and calibration, Irish Manufacturing Committee Conference, Belfast, 1991, pp. 734-748.
20. G.H. Peggs, A review of the methods for the accurate metrology of complex three-dimensional components and artefacts. NPL Report MOM 101, March 1991.
21. M. Deni, Tough trigger probe accuracy verification, CMM News, NPL, Issue 1, Autumn 1992.
22. S.D. Phillips, B. Borchardt, G. Caskey, Measurement Uncertainty Considerations for Coordinate Measuring Machines. NISTIR-5170, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, April 1993.
23. R. Hocken, J. Raja, U. Babu, Sampling issues in coordinate metrology, Manufacturing Review 6 (4) (1993) 282-294.
24. R.A.E. Aston, An investigation into the directional variability of a touch probe. Centre for Metrology Internal Report, School of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Birmingham, 1994.
25. A. Overs, Probe performance - optimise or compromise. Quality Today, January 1994, pp. s1-s4.
26. C. Reid, Performance characteristics of touch trigger probes. CMM News, NPL, Issue 1, Teddington, Autumn 1992.
27. C. Reid, Performance characteristics of touch trigger probes, Quality Today Buyers Guide, 1995.
28. NPL, A new calibration service-CMM probes. National Physical Laboratory, NPL News, No. 373, Spring 1993, p. 4.
29. W. Lotze, Multidimensional measuring probe head improves accuracy and functionality of coordinate measuring machines, Measurement 13 (2) (1994) 91-97.
30. D.R. McMurty, Probing Present and Future. Two Day Seminar, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK, 18-19 April 1994.
31. E.J. Davis, W.J. Liao, G.F. Scott, K.J. Sout, Sources of measurement uncertainty when using coordinate measuring machines: a top-down systematic aproach, 2nd Laser Metrology and Machine Performance, Southampton, 1995, pp. 185-201.
32. W.J. Liao, E.J. Davis, G.F. Scott, K.J. Sout, Parameter design approach to quantify and reduce measurement uncertainty when using coordinate measuring machines: effect of probing parameters. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Laser Metrology and Machine Performance, Southampton, 1995, pp. 213-223.
33. M. Chan, Performance verification of mistral CMM. In: Proceedings of the 1st Annual Symposium of Postgraduate Research. School of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Birmingham, April 1995.
34. S.D. Phillips, Coordinate Measuring Machines and Systems, Chapter 7: Performance Evaluations, J.A. Bosch (Ed.), Marcel Dekker Inc. New York, 1995, pp. 137-226.
35. R.K. Leach, A novel 3-axis CMM probe calibration facility. NPL Report MOM 126, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, April 1995.
36. J. Ni, Coordinate Measuring Machines and Systems, Chapter 4: Accessory Elements, J.A. Bosch (Ed.), Marcel Dekker Inc. New York, 1995, pp. 85-102.
37. P.J.S. Baird, Computer simulation of a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) probing system. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Laser Metrology and Machine Performance, Southampton, 1995, pp. 203-212.
38. A. Balsamo, Effects of arbitrary coefficients of CMM error maps on probe qualification, Annals of the CIRP 44 (1995) 475-478.
39. W.T. Estler, S.D. Phillips, B. Borchardt, T. Hopp, C. Witz-gall, M. Levenson, K. Eberhardt, M. MacClain, Error compensation for CMM touch trigger probes. In: Proceedings of the ASPE Annual Meeting, Vol. 12, 1995, pp. 428-430.
40. Y.L. Shen, X. Zhang, A pre-travel model of touch trigger probes with straight styli, part I: vertical probes. In: Proceedings of the North American Manufacturing Research Institution of SME (XXIV NAMRC), Ann Arbor, MI, May 1996, pp. 127-132.
41. Y.L. Shen, X. Zhang, A pre-travel model of touch trigger probes with straight styli, part II: horizontal probes. In: Proceedings of the North American Manufacturing Research Institution of SME (XXIV NAMRC), Ann Arbor, MI, May 1996, pp. 133-138.
42. Q. Yang, C. Butler, P. Baird, Error compensation of touch trigger probes, Measurement 18 (1) (1996) 47-57.
43. P.A. Cauchick Miguel, CMM performance verification, considerations for a virtual artefact approach. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Birmingham, UK, December 1996.