Using surrogate data in population viability analysis: The case of the critically endangered cranberry fritillary butterfly

Oikos

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 89-100

  Schtickzelle, Nicolas ^a   WallisDeVries, Michiel F ^b   Baguette, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b Vlinderstichting/Dutch Butterfly C   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ENDANGERED SPECIES; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

BELGIUM; BENELUX; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE; WORLD;

FRITILLARIA (ANGIOSPERM); POTATO VIRUS A; VACCINIUM MACROCARPON;

EID: 17144400417     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13745.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Akçakaya, H. R. 2002. RAMAS/GIS: Linking spatial data with population viability analysis (version 4.0). - Applied Biomathematics.
2. Akçakaya, H. R. and Sjögren-Gulve, P. 2000. Population viability analyses in conservation planning: an overview. - Ecol. Bull. 48: 9-21.
3. Baguette, M. 2003. Long distance dispersal and landscape occupancy in a metapopulation of the cranberry fritillary butterfly. - Ecography 26: 153-160.
4. Baguette, M., Goffart, Ph. and De Bast, B. 1992. Modification de la distribution et du statut des Lépidoptères Rhopalocères en Belgique depuis 1900. - Mém. Soc. R. Belge d'Entomol. 35: 591-596.
5. Baguette, M. and Schtickzelle, N. 2003. Local population dynamics are important to the conservation of metapopulations in highly fragmented landscapes. - J. Appl. Ecol. 40: 404-412.
6. Barascud, B., Martin, J. F., Baguette, M. et al. 1999. Genetic consequences of an introduction-colonization process in an endangered butterfly species. - J. Evol. Biol. 12: 697-709.
7. Bart, J. 1995. Acceptance criteria for using individual-based models to make management decisions. - Ecol. Appl. 5: 411-420.
8. Beissinger, S. R. and McCullough, D. R. 2002. Population viability analysis. - The Univ. of Chicago Press.
9. Beissinger, S. R. and Westphal, M. I. 1998. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. - J. Wildlife Manage. 62: 821-841.
10. Brook, B. W., O'Grady, J. J., Chapman, A. P. et al. 2000. Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. - Nature 404: 385-387.
11. Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. - Springer-Verlag.
12. Coulson, T., Mace, G. M., Hudson, E. et al. 2001. The use and abuse of population viability analysis. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 219-221.
13. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life, 5th ed (1859). - Appleton and Co.
14. Dumont, J.-M. and Champluvier, D. 1990. La gestion de la réserve domaniale du plateau des Tailles. Elaboration du plan, essais de mise en oeuvre, coût de la gestion. - In: Région Wallonne (ed.), Gérer la nature? Travaux Service de Conservation de la Nature no 15. Région Wallonne édition, pp. 359-382.
15. Dunning, J. B., Stewart, D. J., Danielson, B. J. et al. 1995. Spatially explicit population models: current forms and future uses. - Ecol. Appl. 5: 3-11.
16. Foley, P. 1994. Predicting extinction times from environmental stochasticity and carrying capacity. - Conserv. Biol. 8: 124-137.
17. Frankham, R. 2002. Predicting extinction risk. - Nature 419: 18-19.
18. Hanski, I. 2002. Metapopulations of animals in highly fragmented landscapes and population viability analysis. - In: Beissinger, S. R. and McCullough, D. R. (eds), Population viability analysis. The Univ. of Chicago Press, pp. 86-108.
19. Hanski, I., Alho, J. and Moilanen, A. 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. - Ecology 81: 239-251.
20. Kudrna, O. 1986. Butterflies of Europe, vol. 8: aspects of the conservation of butterflies in Europe. - AULA-Verlag.
21. Lande, R. 2002. Incorporating stochasticity in population viability analysis. - In: Beissinger, S. R. and McCullough, D. R. (eds), Population viability analysis. The Univ. of Chicago Press, pp. 18-40.
22. Linacre, N., Stewart-Oaten, A., Burgman, M. A. et al. 2004. Incorporating collateral data in conservation biology. - Conserv. Biol. 18: 768-774.
23. Lindenmayer, D. B., Possingham, H. P., Lacy, R. C. et al. 2003. How accurate are population models? Lessons from landscape-scale tests in a fragmented system. - Ecol. Lett. 6: 41-47.
24. McCarthy, M. A., Andelman, S. J. and Possingham, H. P. 2003. Reliability of relative predictions in population viability analysis. - Conserv. Biol. 17: 982-989.
25. McLaughlin, J. F., Hellmann, J. J., Boggs, C. L. et al. 2002. Climate change hastens population extinctions. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 99: 6070-6074.
26. Mennechez, G., Petit, S., Schtickzelle, N. et al. 2004. Modelling mortality and dispersal: consequences of parameter generalisation on metapopulation modelling. - Oikos 106: 243-252.
27. Morris, W. F. and Doak, D. F. 2002. Quantitative conservation biology. Theory and practice of population viability analysis. - Sinauer Associates.
28. Mousson, L., Nève, G. and Baguette, M. 1999. Metapopulation structure and conservation of the cranberry fritillary Boloria aquilonaris (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) in Belgium. - Biol. Conserv. 87: 285-293.
29. Petit, S., Moilanen, A., Hanski, I. et al. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches. - Oikos 92: 491-500.
30. Pimm, S. L. and Raven, P. 2000. Biodiversity-extinction by numbers. - Nature 403: 843-845.
31. Rails, K. and Taylor, B. L. 1997. How viable is population viability analysis? - In: Pickett, S. T. A., Ostfeld, R. S., Shachak, M. et al. (eds), The ecological basis of conservation: heterogeneity, ecosystems, and biodiversity. Chapman & Hall, pp. 228-235.
32. Reed, J. M., Mills, L. S., Dunning, J. B. et al. 2002. Emerging issues in population viability analysis. - Conserv. Biol. 16: 7-19.
33. Schtickzelle, N. 2003. Metapopulation dynamics and viability of the bog fritillary butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. - PhD thesis, Université catholique de Louvain.
34. Schtickzelle, N. and Baguette, M. 2003. Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. - J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 533-545.
35. Schtickzelle, N. and Baguette, M. 2004. Metapopulation viability analysis of the bog fritillary butterfly using RA-MAS/GIS. - Oikos 104: 277-290.
36. Semlitsch, R. D. and Bodie, J. R. 1998. Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? - Conserv. Biol. 12: 1129-1133.
37. Thomas, J. A. 1983. A quick method for estimating butterfly numbers during surveys. - Biol. Conserv. 27: 195-211.
38. Travis, J. M. J. 2003. Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 467-473.
39. Van Swaay, C. A. M. and Wallis de Vries, M. F. 2001. Beschermingsplan veenvlinders 2001-2005. - Rapport Directie Natuurbeheer nr. 52, Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij.
40. Vandewoestijne, S. and Baguette, M. 2002. The genetic structure of endangered populations in the cranbery fritillary butterfly, Boloria aquilonaris (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae): RAPDs vs allozymes. - Heredity 89: 439-445.
41. Wahlberg, N., Klemetti, T., Selonen, V. et al. 2002. Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checker-spot butterflies. - Oecologia 130: 33-43.
42. Wallis de Vries, M. F. 2003. Bescherming van de Veenbesparelmoervlinder. nog geen vaste grond onder de voeten. - De Levende Natuur 104: 11-15.
43. Warren, M. S. 1991. The successful conservation of an endangered species, the heath fritillary butterfly Mellicta athalia, in Britain. - Biol. Conserv. 55: 37-56.
44. Warren, M. S., Hill, J. K., Thomas, J. A. et al. 2001. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. - Nature 414: 65-69.
45. White, G. C. 2000. Population viability analysis: data requirements and essential analyses. - In: Boitani, L. and Fuller, T. K. (eds), Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. Columbia Univ. Press, pp. 288-331.