Incorporating collateral data in conservation biology

Conservation Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 768-774

  Linacre, Nicholas A ^a   Stewart Oaten, Allan ^b   Burgman, Mark A ^a   Ades, Peter K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Collateral data; Control cycle; Credibility theory; Empirical Bayes; Mortality rate

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DATA ASSIMILATION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; MORTALITY; RAPTOR;

NINOX; NINOX STRENUA; RAPTORES; STRIGIFORMES;

EID: 2542500742     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00067.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Boyce, M. S. 1992. Population viability analysis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23:481-506.
2. Buhlmann, H. 1967. Experience rating and credibility. ASTIN Bulletin 4:199-207.
3. Buhlmann, H. 1969. Experience rating and credibility. ASTIN Bulletin 5:157-165.
4. Burgman, M. A., S. Ferson, and H. R. Akçakaya. 1993. Risk assessment in conservation biology. Chapman and Hall, London.
5. Coulson, T., G. M. Mace, E. Hudson, and H. Possingham. 2001. The use and abuse of population viability analysis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:219-221.
6. Cox, D. R., and Hinkley, D. V. 1974. Theoretical statistics. Chapman Hall, London.
7. Efron, B., and C. Morris. 1973. Stein's estimation rule and its competitors: an empirical Bayes approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association 68:117-130.
8. Efron, B., and C. N. Morris. 1975. Stien's paradox in statistics. Scientific American 236:119-127.
9. Goford, J. 1985. The control cycle: financial control of a life assurance company. Journal of The Students' Society 30:99-114.
10. Hart, D. G., R. A. Buchanan, and B. A. Howe. 1996. The actuarial practice of general insurance. Institute of Actuaries Australia, Sydney.
11. Herzog, T. N. 1994. Introduction to credibility theory. ACTEX Publications, Winsted, Connecticut.
12. Hilborn, R., and M. Mangel. 1997. The ecological detective confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
13. Hilborn, R., and C. J. Walters. 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment choice, dynamics and uncertainty. Chapman and Hall, London.
14. Kaplan, S. 1992. 'Expert information' versus 'expert opinion': another approach to the problem of eliciting/combining expert knowledge in PRA. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 35:61-72.
15. Klugman, S. A., H. H. Panjer, and G. E. Willmot. 1998. Loss models from data to decisions. Wiley, New York.
16. Link, W. A., and D. C. Hahn. 1996. Empirical Bayes estimation of proportions with applications to cowbird parasitism rates. Ecology 77:2528-2537.
17. Ludwig, D. 1993. Environmental sustainability: magic, science, and religion in natural resource management. Ecological Applications 3:555-558.
18. Ludwig, D. 1996. Uncertainty and the assessment of extinction probabilities. Ecological Applications 6:1067-1076.
19. Ludwig, D. 1999. Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction. Ecology 80:298-310.
20. McCarthy, M. A., A. Webster, R. H. Loyn, and K. M. Lowe. 1999. Uncertainty in assessing the viability of the Powerful Owl Ninox strenua in Victoria, Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 5:144-154.
21. Norberg, R. 1979. The credibility approach to experience rating. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 1979:181-221.
22. Ver Hoef, J. M. 1996. Parametric empirical Bayes methods for ecological applications. Ecological Applications 6:1047-1055.
23. Wade, P. R. 2000. Bayesian methods in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 14:1308-1316.
24. Waters, H. R. 1993. An introduction to credibility theory. Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.