The adaptation and cavity sealing ability of compomer restorative materials

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 327-330

  Sidhu, Sharanbir K ^a   McCabe, John F ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; F2000 CEMENT; FLUORESCENT DYE; GLASS IONOMER; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; PROMPT L POP; PROMPT L-POP; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; RHODAMINE; RHODAMINE B;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; PHASE TRANSITION; SCOTCHBOND; TOOTH DISEASE;

COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; FLUORESCENT DYES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; PHASE TRANSITION; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; RHODAMINES;

EID: 16544381530     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 587-589.
2. Van Dijken JWV. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin- modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Gass III restorations. Am JDent 1996; 9:195-198.
3. Morabito A, Defabianis P. The marginal seal of various restorative materials in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1997; 22:51-54.
4. Yap AU, Lim CC, Neo JC. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 817-820.
5. Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl A, Weber K, Hickel R. Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive Class V restorations. J Dent 2001; 29:123-130.
6. Campanella LC, Meiers JC. Microleakage of composites and compomers in Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1999; 12:185-189.
7. Crim GA, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. Comparison of four thermocyclmg techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 50-53.
8. Watson TF. A confocal microscopic study of some factors affecting the adaptation of a light-cured glass ionomer to tooth tissue. J Dent Res 1990; 69:1531-1538.
9. Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Losche GM, Roulet J. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent 2000; 28: 399-405.
10. Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Vaidyanathan TK, Von Hagen S. Microleakage of compomer Class V restorations: Effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 194-203.
11. Momoi Y, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from light-activated glass ionomer restorative cements. Dent Mater 1993; 9:151-154.
12. Irie M, Suzuki K. Water storage effect on the marginal seal of resin- modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 1999; 24:272-278.
13. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Uno S. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light- cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 253-258.
14. Trushkowsky RD, Gwinnett AJ. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 96-99.
15. Momoi Y, McCabe JF. Hygroscopic expansion of resin based composites during 6 months of water storage. Brit Dent J 1994; 176: 91-96.
16. Schneider BT, Baumann MA, Watanabe LG, Marshall GW. Dentin shear strength of compomers and composites. Dent Mater 2000; 16:15-19.
17. Meiers JC, Young D. Two-year composite/dentin bond stability. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 141-144.
18. Ei-Kalla IH. Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars. Am J Dent 1999; 12:37-43.