The Effects of Knowledge Management on Team Members' Ratings of Project Success and Impact

Decision Sciences

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 513-539

  Fedor, Donald B ^a   Ghosh, Soumen ^a   Caldwell, Steven D ^a   Maurer, Todd J ^b   Singhal, Vinod R ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM); Knowledge Management; Organizational Learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642573290     PISSN: 00117315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02395.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Argyris, C. (1994). Good communication that blocks learning. Harvard Business Review, 77-85.
2. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Barczak, G., & Wilemon, D. (1989) Leadership differences in new product development team. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 6, 259-267.
4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
5. Beer, M. (1999). Leading learning and learning to lead. In J. A. Conger, G. M. Spreitzer, & E. E. Lawler, III (Eds.), The change leaders handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Bierly, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 123-135.
7. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 349-381.
8. Booz Allen, & Hamilton (1982). New product management for the 1980's. New York: Booz Allen & Hamilton.
9. Bounds, G., York, L., Adams, M., & Ranney, G. (1994). Beyond total quality management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1997). A framework for developing team performance measures in training. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: LEA, 45-62.
11. Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
12. Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1986). An investigation into the new product process: Steps, deficiencies, and impact. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3, 71-85.
13. Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1987). What separates winners from losers? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 169-184.
14. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
15. Ellinger, A., Ellinger, A., Yang, B. & Howton, S. (2002). The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms' financial performance: An empirical assessment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13, 5-21.
16. Fedor, D., Parsons, C., & Shalley, C. (1996). Organizational comparison processes: Investigating the adoption and impact of benchmarking-related activities. Journal of Quality Management, 1, 161-192.
17. Funder, D. C. (1991). Global traits: A neo-Allportian approach to personality. Psychological Science, 2, 31-39.
18. Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, (July/August), 78-91.
19. Goodman, P. S., Ravlin, E., & Argote, L. (1986). Current thinking about groups: Setting the stage for new ideas. In P. S. Goodman & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 315-342.
21. Herold, D. M., & Fedor, D. B. (1998). Individuals' interaction with their feedback environment. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management. Vol. 16, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 215-254.
22. Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723-744.
23. Hofmann, D. A. (2002). Personal communication, September 15.
24. Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J. W. (1978). A further look at leader legitimacy, influence, and innovation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Group processes. New York: Academic.
25. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 42-54.
26. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
27. Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22(3), 375-403.
28. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2002). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology (Vol. 12): Industrial and organizational psychology. Wiley: New York.
29. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 3-90.
30. Maurer, T., Pierce, H. & Shore, L. (2002). Perceived beneficiary of employee development activity: A three-dimensional social exchange model. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 432-444.
31. Maurer, T., & Tarulli, B. (1996). Acceptance of peer/upward performance appraisal systems: Role of work context factors and beliefs about managers' development capability. Human Resource Management Journal, 35, 217-241.
32. Miller, D. (1996). Preliminary typology of organizational learning: Synthesizing the literature. Journal of Management, 22, 485-505.
33. Mitchell, T. R., & Larson, J. R. (1987). People in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Calantone, R. J. (1994). Determinant of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 397-417.
35. Mukherjee, A. S., Lapre, M. A., & Van Wassenhove, L. K. (1998). Knowledge driven quality improvement. Management Science, 44, S35-S49.
36. Nemeth, C. J. (1992). Minority dissent as a stimulant to group performance. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Nonaka, I. (1988). Creating organizational order out of chaos: Self-renewal in Japanese firms. California Management Review, 30(3), 57-73.
38. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, (November/December), 96-104.
39. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-38.
40. Pinto, J. L., & Sleven, D. P. (1987). Critical success factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions in Engineering Management, 34(1), 22-27.
41. Pinto, J. L., & Mantel. S. K. (1997). The causes of project failure. IEEE Transactions in Engineering Management, 37(4), 269-276.
42. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Schwarz, R. M. (1994). The skilled facilitator: Practical wisdom for developing effective groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
45. Shaw, M. (1964). Communications networks. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 111-147.
46. Shaw, M. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Sitkin, S. B., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Schroeder, R. G. (1994). Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: A contingency perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19, 537-564.
48. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
49. Szulanski, G. (1994). Intra-firm transfer of best practices project. Executive summary, American Productivity and Quality Center, Houston, TX.
50. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43.
51. Weingart, L. R. (1997). How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 189-239.
52. Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1992). Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. New York: Free Press.
53. Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54. Zaccaro, S. J., & Marks, M. A. (1999). The roles of leaders in high-performance teams. In E. Sundstrom & Assoicates (Eds.), Supporting work team effectiveness: Best management practices for fostering high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 95-125.
55. Zander, A. (1979). Groups at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.