Correlated evolution in fig pollination

Systematic Biology

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 128-139

  Weiblen, George D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Agaonidae; Coadaptation; Coevolution; Comparative methods; Ficus; Mutualism

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; RIBOSOME DNA;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; FICUS; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MORPHOMETRICS; PHYLOGENY; SYMBIOSIS; WASP;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; FICUS; PHYLOGENY; SYMBIOSIS; WASPS;

AGAONIDAE; AGAONINAE; ANIMALIA; EMBRYOPHYTA; FICUS (ANGIOSPERM); HYMENOPTERA; MORACEAE; VESPIDAE;

EID: 1642390177     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150490265012     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (69)

1. Anstett, M. C., M. Gibernau, and M. Hossaert-McKey. 1998. Partial avoidance of female inflorescences of a dioecious fig by their mutualistic pollinating wasps. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:45-50.
2. Anstett, M. C., M. Hossaert-McKey, and F. Kjellberg. 1997. Figs and fig pollinators: Evolutionary conflicts in a coevolved mutualism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:94-98.
3. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2002. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56:936-947.
4. Baijnath, H., and S. Ramcharun. 1983. Aspects of pollination and floral development in Ficus capensis Thunb. (Moraceae). Bothalia 14:883-888.
5. Baum, D. A., and A. Larson. 1991. Adaptation reviewed: A phylogenetic methodology for studying character macroevolution. Syst. Zool. 40:1-18.
6. Berg, C. C. 1986. The Ficus species (Moraceae) of Madagascar and the Comoro Islands. Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat. Paris 8:17-55.
7. Berg, C. C. 1990. Reproduction and evolution of Ficus (Moraceae): Traits connected with the adequate rearing of pollinators. Mem. N.Y. Bot. Gard. 55:169-185.
8. Bronstein, J. L. 1988. Mutualism, antagonism and the fig-pollinator interaction. Ecology 69:1298-1302.
9. Clayton, D. H., S. Al-Tamimi, and K. P. Johnson. 2003. The ecological basis of coevolutionary history. Pages 310-350 in Tangled trees: Phylogeny, cospeciation, and coevolution (R. D. M. Page, ed.). Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. Coddington, J. A. 1988. Cladistic tests of adaptational hypotheses. Cladistics 4:3-22.
11. Compton, S. G., and R. J. C. Nefdt. 1988. Extra-long ovipositors in chalcid wasps: Some examples and observations. Antenna 12:102-105.
12. Corner, E. J. H. 1985. Ficus (Moraceae) and Hymenoptera (Chalcidoidea): Figs and their pollinators. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 25:187-195.
13. Cunningham, C. W., K. E. Omland, and T. H. Oakley. 1998. Reconstructing ancestral character states: A critical reappraisal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:361-366.
14. Cunningham, D. D. 1888. On the phenomena of fertilization in Ficus roxburghii Wall. Ann. R. Bot. Gard. Calcutta 1(Appendix):11-51.
15. Donoghue, M. J. 1989. Phylogenies and the analysis of evolutionary sequences with examples from the seed plants. Evolution 43:1137-1156.
16. Donoghue, M. J., and D. A. Ackerly. 1996. Phylogenetic uncertainties and sensitivity analyses in comparative biology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 351:1241-1249.
17. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
18. Frumhoff, P. C., and H. K. Reeve. 1994. Using phylogenies to test hypotheses of adaptation: A critique of some current proposals. Evolution 48:172-180.
19. Futuyma, D. J., and M. Slatkin (eds.). 1983. Coevolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
20. Ganeshaiah, K. N., and P. Kathuria. 1999. Does optimal packing of flowers in syconia shape style length variation in monoecious figs? Biotropica 31:312-320.
21. Ganeshaiah, K. N., P. Kathuria, R. U. Shaanker, and R. Vasudeva. 1995. Evolution of style-length variability in figs and optimization of ovipositor length in their pollinator wasps: A coevolutionary model. J. Genet. 74:25-39.
22. Garland, T., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41:18-32.
23. Grafen, A., and H. C. J. Godfray. 1991. Vicarious selection explains some paradoxes in dioecious fig-pollinator systems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 245:73-76.
24. Harrison, R. D., and N. Yamamura. 2003. A few more hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in figs (Ficus, Moraceae). Oikos 100:628-635.
25. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.
26. Herre, E. A. 1989. Coevolution of reproductive characteristics in 12 species of New World figs and their pollinator wasps. Experientia 45:637-647.
27. Herre, E. A., N. Knowlton, U. G. Mueller, and S. A. Rehner. 1999. The evolution of mutualisms: Exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:49-53.
28. Herre, E. A., C. A. Machado, E. Bermingham, J. D. Nason, D. M. Windsor, S. S. McCafferty, W. V. Houten, and K. Bachmann. 1996. Molecular phylogenies of figs and their pollinator wasps. J. Biogeogr. 23:521-530.
29. Herre, E. A., and S. A. West. 1997. Conflict of interest in a mutualism: Documenting the elusive fig-wasp-seed tradeoff. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:1501-1507.
30. Janzen, D. H. 1979. How to be a fig. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10:13-51.
31. Jousselin, E., M. Hossaert-McKey, D. Vernet, and F. Kjellberg. 2001. Egg deposition patterns of fig pollinating wasps: Implications for studies on the stability of the mutualism. Ecol. Entomol. 26:602-608.
32. Kathuria, P., K. N. Ganeshaiah, R. U. Shaanker, and R. Vasudeva. 1995. Is there a dimorphism for style lengths in monoecious figs? Curr. Sci. 68:1047-1050.
33. Kerdelhué, C., and J.-Y. Rasplus. 1996. The evolution of dioecy among Ficus (Moraceae): An alternate hypothesis involving non-pollinating fig wasp pressure on the fig-pollinator mutualism. Oikos 77:163-166.
34. Kiester, A. R., R. Lande, and D. W. Schemske. 1984. Models of coevolution and speciation in plants and their pollinators. Am. Nat. 124:220-243.
35. Kjellberg, F., P. H. Gouyon, M. Ibrahim, M. Raymond, and G. Valdeyron. 1987. The stability of the symbiosis between dioecious figs and their pollinators: A study of Ficus carica L. and Blastophaga psenes L. Evolution 41:693-704.
36. Laman, T. G., and G. D. Weiblen. 1998. Figs of Gunung Palung National Park (West Kalimantan, Indonesia). Trop. Biodiv. 5:245-297.
37. Leroi, A. M., M. R. Rose, and G. V. Lauder. 1994. What does the comparative method reveal about adaptation? Am. Nat. 143:381-402.
38. Lopez-Vaamonde, C., J.-Y. Rasplus, G. Weiblen, and J. M. Cook. 2001. DNA-based phylogenies of fig wasps: Partial co-cladogenesis between pollinators and parasites. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 21:55-71.
39. Losos, J. B., and D. B. Miles. 1994. Adaptation, constraint, and the comparative method: Phylogenetic issues and methods. Pages 60-98 in Ecological morphology (P. C. Wainwright and S. M. Reilly, eds.). Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
40. Machado, C. A., E. A. Herre, S. McCafferty, and E. Birmingham. 1996. Molecular phylogenies of fig pollinating and nonpollinating wasps and the implications for the origin and evolution of the fig-fig wasp mutualism. J. Biogeogr. 23:531-542.
41. Machado, C. A., E. Jousselin, F. Kjellberg, S. G. Compton, and E. A. Herre. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships, historical biogeography and character evolution of fig-pollinating wasps. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:685-694.
42. Maddison, W. P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: Are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? Evolution 44:539-557.
43. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
44. Martins, E. P. 2000. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:296-298.
45. Martins, E. P. 2001. COMPARE 4.4. Computer programs for the statistical analysis of comparative data. Department of Biology, Indiana Univ., Bloomington.
46. Martins, E. P., and T. Garland. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: A simulation study. Evolution 45:534-557.
47. Martins, E. P., and T. F. Hansen. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: A general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149:646-667.
48. Morand, S., M. S. Hafner, R. D. M. Page, and D. L. Reed. 2000. Comparative body size relationships in pocket gophers and their chewing lice. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 70:239-249.
49. Murray, M. G. 1985. Figs (Ficus spp.) and fig wasps (Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae): Hypotheses for an ancient symbiosis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 26:69-81.
50. Nefdt, R. J. C., and S. G. Compton. 1996. Regulation of seed and pollinator production in the fig-fig wasp mutualism. J. Anim. Ecol. 65:170-182.
51. Page, R. D. M. (ed.). 2003. Tangled trees: Phylogeny, Cospeciation, and Coevolution. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
52. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: A general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255:37-45.
53. Pagel, M. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scr. 26:331-348.
54. Patel, A., M. Anstett, M. Hossaert-McKey, and F. Kjellberg. 1995. Pollinators entering female dioecious figs: Why commit suicide? J. Evol. Biol. 8:301-313.
55. Ramirez, W. B. 1978. Evolution of mechanisms to carry pollen in Agaonidae (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea). Tijdschr. Entomol. 121:279-293.
56. Ramirez, W. B. 1980. Evolution of the monoecious and dioecious habit in Ficus (Moraceae). Brenesia 18:207-215.
57. Sillen-Tullberg, B. 1993. The effect of biased inclusion of taxa on the correlation between discrete characters in the phylogenetic trees. Evolution 47:1182-1191.
58. van Noort, S., and S. G. Compton. 1996. Convergent evolution of agaonine and sycoecine (Agaonidae, Chalcidoidea) head shape in response to the constraints of host fig morphology. J. Biogeogr. 23:415-424.
59. Verkerke, W. 1988. Sycone morphology and its influence on the flower structure of Ficus sur (Moraceae). Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. C Biol. Med. Sci. 91:321-344.
60. Weiblen, G. D. 1999. Phylogeny and ecology of dioecious fig pollination. Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
61. Weiblen, G. D. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of functionally dioecious Ficus (Moraceae) based on ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Am. J. Bot. 87:1342-1357.
62. Weiblen, G. D. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of fig wasps pollinating functionally dioecious figs based on mitochondrial DNA sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 50:243-267.
63. Weiblen, G. D., and G. L. Bush. 2002. Speciation in fig pollinators and parasites. Mol. Ecol. 11:1573-1578.
64. Weiblen, G., B. Flick, and H. Spencer. 1995. Seed set and wasp predation in dioecious Ficus variegata from an Australian wet tropical forest. Biotropica 27:391-394.
65. Weiblen, G. D., D. W. Yu, and S. A. West. 2001. Pollination and parasitism in functionally dioecious figs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:651-659.
66. Wiebes, J. T. 1963. Taxonomy and host preferences of Indo-Australian fig wasps of the genus Ceratosolen (Agaonidae). Tijdschr. Entomol. 106:1-112.
67. Wiebes, J. T. 1979. Co-evolution of figs and their insect pollinators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10:1-12.
68. Wiebes, J. T. 1981. The species-group of Ceratosolen armipes Wiebes (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae). Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. C Biol. Med. Sci. 84:365-377.
69. Yokoyama, J. 1995. Insect-plant coevolution and speciation. Pages 115-130 in Biodiversity and evolution (R. Arai, M. Kato, and Y. Doi, eds.). National Science Museum Foundation, Tokyo.