Experimental Quantitative Comparison of Different Control Architectures for Master-Slave Teleoperation

IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 2-11

  Aliaga, Iñaki ^a   Rubio, Ángel ^b   Sánchez, Emilio ^b  

^a LANDER Simulat/Train SSA   (Spain)

^b CEIT   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bilateral control; Force feedback; Performance comparison; Teleoperation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; FORCE CONTROL; POSITION CONTROL; ROBOT APPLICATIONS; SYSTEM STABILITY; TRACKING (POSITION);

BILATERAL CONTROL; FORCE FEEDBACK; FORCE-POSITION (FP) CONTROL ALGORITHMS; PERFORMANCE COMPARISON; POSITION-POSITION (PP) CONTROL ALGORITHMS; TELEOPERATION;

REMOTE CONTROL;

EID: 1642349477     PISSN: 10636536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2003.819586     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. R. W. Daniel and P. R. McAree, "Fundamental limits of performance for force reflecting teleoperation," The Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 811-830, Aug. 1998.
2. L. F. Peñín, K. Matsumoto, and S. Wakabayashi, "Force reflection for time-delayed teleoperation of space robots," Proc. 2000 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automation, vol. 4, pp. 3120-3125, Apr. 2000.
3. D. A. Lawrence, "Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation," IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat., vol. 9, pp. 624-637, Oct. 1993.
4. Y. Yokokohji and T. Yoshikawa, "Bilateral control of master-slave manipulators for ideal kinesthetic coupling. Formulation and experiment," IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat., vol. 10, pp. 605-620, Oct. 1994.
5. K. Hashtrudi-Zaad and S. E. Salcudean, "On the use of local force feed-back for transparent teleoperation," Proc. 1999 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat., vol. 3, pp. 1863-1869, May 1999.
6. B. Hannaford, "A design framework for teleoperators with kinesthetic feedback," IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat., vol. 5, pp. 426-434, Aug. 1989.
7. L. F. Peñín, "Bilateral control of teleoperated robots. Contributions in force refection," Ph.D. dissertation, Madrid, 1998. in Spanish.
8. B. Hannaford, "Stability and performance tradeoffs in bi-lateral telemanipulation," Proc. 1989 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat., vol. 3, pp. 1764-1767, 1989.
9. H. Flemmer, B. Eriksson, and J. Wikander, "Control design and stability analysis of a surgical teleoperator," Mechatronics, vol. 9, pp. 843-866, 1999.
10. J. E. Colgate and J. M. Brown, "Factors affecting the Z-width of a haptic display," Proc. 1994 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat., vol. 4, pp. 3205-3210, May 1994.
11. K. B. Fite, J. E. Speich, and M. Goldfarb, "Transparency and stability robustness in two-channel bilateral telemanipulation," ASME J. Dynam. Syst., Measure. Contr., vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 400-407.
12. A. Rubio, A. Avello, and J. Florez, "Adaptive impedance modification of a master-slave manipulator," Proc. 1999 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat., vol. 3, pp. 1794-1799, May 1999.
13. I. Aliaga, "Implementation and comparison of several force-reflecting teleoperation architectures, in a 2 D.O.F. master-slave system," Master Thesis, Dec. 2000. in Spanish.
14. N. Hogan, "Impedance control: An approach to manipulation. Part I - Theory," J. Dynam. Syst., Measure. Contr., vol. 107, pp. 1-7, Mar. 1985.