Selective reduction of alkenes, α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds, nitroarenes, nitroso compounds, N,N-hydrogenolysis of azo and hydrazo functions as well as simultaneous hydrodehalogenation and reduction of substituted aryl halides over PdMCM-41 catalyst under transfer hydrogen conditions

Tetrahedron Letters

Volumn 45, Issue 15, 2004, Pages 3071-3075

  Selvam, Parasuraman ^a   Sonavane, Sachin U ^b   Mohapatra, Susanta K ^a   Jayaram, Radha V ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI   (India)

Author keywords

, Unsaturated carbonyl compounds; Alkenes; Aryl halides; Azo and hydrazo functions; Hydrogen transfer; Nitroarenes; Nitroso compounds; PdMCM 41 catalyst

Indexed keywords

ALKENE DERIVATIVE; AROMATIC NITRO COMPOUND; AZO COMPOUND; CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; HALIDE; HYDROGEN; NITROSO DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CATALYST; DEHALOGENATION; HYDROGENATION; HYDROGENOLYSIS; POROSITY; PROTON TRANSPORT; RECYCLING; REDUCTION; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

EID: 1642332274     PISSN: 00404039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.02.098     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Imamoto T. Trost B. M., Fleming I. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis. Vol. 8:1991;793-809 Pergamon, Oxford.
2. Kabalka G.W., Verma R.S. Trost B.M., Fleming I. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis. Vol. 8:1991;363-379 Pergamon, Oxford.
3. Huang Z., Tang Y. J. Org. Chem. 67:2002;5320-5326.
4. Keinan E., Greenspoon N., Rappoport P. The Chemistry of Enones, Part 2. 1989;Wiley, New York.
5. Baik W., Rhee J.U., Lee N.H., Kim B.H., Kim K.S. Tetrahedron Lett. 36:1995;2793-2794.
6. Corey E.J., Helal C.J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 37:1998;1986-2012.
7. Larock R.C. Comprehensive Organic Transformations: A Guide to Functional Group Preparation. 2nd ed. 1999;Wiley-VCH, New York. pp 821-828.
8. Ohkuma T., Takeno H., Honda Y., Nayori R. Adv. Synth. Catal. 343:2001;369-375.
9. Alonso F., Beletskaya I.P., Yus M. Chem. Rev. 102:2002;4009-4092.
10. Moisan L., Hardouin C., Rousseau B., Doris E. Tetrahedron Lett. 43:2002;2013-2015.
11. Jurkauskas V., Sadighi J.P., Buchwald S.L. Org. Lett. 5:2003;2417-2420.
12. de Graauw C.F., Peters J.A., van Bekkum H., Huskens J. Synthesis. 1994;1007-1017.
13. Node M., Nishide K., Shigeta Y., Shiraki H., Obata K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122:2000;1927-1936.
14. Ukisu Y., Miyadera T. J. Mol. Catal. A. 125:1997;135-142.
15. Ukisu Y., Miyadera T. Appl. Catal. B. 40:2003;141-149.
16. Aramendía M.A., Borau V., Jiménez C., Marinas J.M., Ruiz J.R., Urbano F. Appl. Catal. A. 249:2003;1-9.
17. Beaupere D., Bauer P., Nadjo L., Uzan R. J. Organomet. Chem. 238:1982;C12-C14.
18. Visintin M., Spogliarich R., Kaspar J., Graziani M. J. Mol. Catal. 24:1984;277-280.
19. Khai B.T., Arcelli A. Tetrahedron Lett. 37:1996;6599-6602.
20. Grushin V.V., Alper H. Chem. Rev. 94:1994;1047-1062.
21. Gallezot P. Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis. Vol. 5:1997;2209-2221 Wiley, New York.
22. Ryndin Y.A., Santini C.C., Prat D., Basset J.M. J. Catal. 190:2000;364-373.
23. De Bruyn M., De Vos D.E., Jacobs P.A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 344:2002;1120-1125.
24. Adimurthy S., Ramachandraiah G., Bedekar A.V. Tetrahedron Lett. 44:2003;6391-6392.
25. Cellier P.A., Spindler J.-F., Taillefer M., Cristau H.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 44:2003;7191-7195.
26. Sommovigo M., Alper H. Tetrahedron Lett. 34:1993;59-62.
27. von Holleben M.L.A., Zucolotto M., Zini C.A., Oliveira E.R. Tetrahedron. 50:1994;973-978.
28. Urbano F.J., Marinas J.M. J. Mol. Catal. A. 173:2001;329-345.
29. Kantam M.L., Bandyopadhyay T., Rahman A., Reddy N.M., Choudary B.M. J. Mol. Catal. A. 133:1998;293-295.
30. Sakthivel A., Badamali S.K., Selvam P. Catal. Lett. 80:2002;73-76.
31. Mohapatra S.K., Hussain F., Selvam P. Catal. Commun. 4:2003;57-62.
32. Sakthivel A., Selvam P. J. Catal. 211:2002;134-143.
33. Mohapatra S.K., Sahoo B., Keune W., Selvam P. Chem. Commun. 2002;1466-1467.
34. Sakthivel A., Dapurkar S.E., Selvam P. New J. Chem. 27:2003;1184-1190.
35. Sakthivel A., Dapurkar S.E., Selvam P. Appl. Catal. A. 246:2003;283-293.
36. Mohapatra S.K., Sonavane S.U., Jayaram R.V., Selvam P. Tetrahedron Lett. 43:2002;8527-8529.
37. Mohapatra S.K., Sonavane S.U., Jayaram R.V., Selvam P. Appl. Catal. B. 46:2003;155-163.
38. Selvam P., Mohapatra S.K., Sonavane S.U., Jayaram R.V. Tetrahedron Lett. 45:2004;2003-2007.
39. -1, and pore size; 31 Å) support the mesoporous nature of the sample. ICP-AES analysis shows 2.8 wt% Pd loading in the catalyst.
40. Kresge C.T., Leonowicz M.E., Roth W.T., Vartuli J.C., Beck J.S. Nature. 359:1992;710-712.
41. Selvam P., Bhatia S.K., Sonwane C.G. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 40:2001;3237-3261.
42. 2 flow at 823 K for 2 h followed by 8 h in air. The yield of PdMCM-41 obtained was about 85% with respect to the starting amount of fumed silica.
43. 3-TPD measurements (peak in the range 833-913 K).
44. In a typical reaction, the substrate (10 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (10 mL) to which ammonium formate (30 mmol) was added as a hydrogen donor along with the catalyst (PdMCM-41; 50 mg). The reaction mixture was then refluxed at 343 K for several minutes to a few hours depending on the nature of the substrates. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC, and the products were analyzed using GC (Eshika) fitted with an OV-17 column. After completion of the reaction, the catalyst was recovered for the recycling studies by simple filtration, washed several times with acetone followed by distilled water, then activated at 373 K for 6 h.
45. Han B.H., Jang D.G. Tetrahedron Lett. 31:1990;1181-1182.
46. -1, and pore size 31 Å). Overall there was no major detrimental effect observed from the reaction conditions over the structural properties of PdMCM-41.