A phylogenetic analysis of Prunus and the Amygdaloideae (Rosaceae) using ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 150-160

  Lee, Sangtae ^a   Wen, Jun ^b,c  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^c FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amygdaloideae; ITS sequences of nrDNA; Phylogeny; Prunus; Rosaceae

Indexed keywords

AMYGDALOIDEAE; EXOCHORDA; MADDENIA; OEMLERIA; PADUS; PRINSEPIA; PRUNUS; PRUNUS DOMESTICA; PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS; ROSACEAE;

EID: 0001671209     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2657135     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. BADENES, M. L., AND D. E. PARFITT. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of cultivated Prunus species from an analysis of chloroplast DNA variation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90: 1035-1041.
2. BALDWIN, B. G., M. J. SANDERSON, J. M. PORTER, M. F. WOJCHIECHOWSKI, C. S. CAMPBELL, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence of angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
3. BEAN, W. J. 1909. Trees and shrubs hardy in British Isles, 8th ed. John Murray, London, UK.
4. BENTHAM, G., AND J. D. HOOKER. 1865. Genera plantarum, vol. 1. Reeve & Co., London, UK.
5. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
6. CRONQUIST, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York. USA.
7. DAVIS, J. M., AND S. E. TAYLOR. 1980. Leaf physiognomy and climate. Quaternary Research 14: 337-348.
8. DE CANDOLLE, A. P. 1813. Catalogus plantarum, horti botanaici monspeliensis. Montpellier, Paris, France.
9. _. 1825. Rosaceae. In Prodromus systematais naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. 2, 525-639. Treuttel & Würtz, Paris, France.
10. DE JUSSEIU, A. L. 1789. Genera plantarum. V. Herissant, Paris, France.
11. DE TOURNEFORT, J. P. 1700. Institutiones rei herbariae, 1st ed. Paris, France.
12. DOYLE, J. J., AND J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
13. FERNALD, M. L. 1950. Gray's manual of botany, 8th ed. American Book Co., New York, New York, USA.
14. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution 17: 368-376.
15. FOCKE, W. O. 1894. Rosaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die natürlichen pflanzenfamilien. III, 3, 1-61. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
16. GAERTNER, J. 1788. Pygeum. In De fructibus et seminibus plantarum, vol. 1, 218-219, pl. 46. Stuttgart/Tuebingen, Germany.
17. GHORA, C., AND G. PANIGRAHI. 1995. The family Rosaceae in India, vol. 2. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, India.
18. GOLDBLATT, P. 1976. Cytotaxonomic studies in the tribe Quillajeac (Rosaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 63: 200-206.
19. GROH, H., AND H. A. SENN. 1940. Prunus in eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Research 18: 318-346.
20. HEGNAUER, R. 1973. Chemotaxonomie der pflanzen, vol. 6. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
21. HICKMAN, J. C. 1993. The Jepson manual, higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
22. HOOKER, J. D. 1886. Icones plantarum, series 3, vol. 16. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, & Longman, London, UK.
23. _, AND T. THOMSON. 1854. On Maddenia and Diplarche, new genera of Himalayan plants. Hooker's Journal of Botany 6: 380-384.
24. HOOKER, W. J., AND G. A. ARNOTT. 1839. The botany of Captain Beechey's voyage, part 8. Henry G. Bohn, London, UK.
25. HUTCHINSON, J. 1964. The genera of flowering plants, vol. 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
26. JUEL, H. O. 1918. Beiträge zur Blütenanatomie und zur Systematik der Rosaceen. Kongliga Vetenskaps Academiens Handlingar. Stockholm 58(5): 1-32.
27. KALKMAN, C. 1965. The Old World species of Prunus subgen. Laurocerasus including those formerly referred to Pygeum. Blumea 13: 1-115.
28. _. 1988. The phylogeny of the Rosaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 98: 37-59.
29. KIMURA, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111-120.
30. KOEHNE, B. A. E. 1893. Deutsche Dendrologie. Verlag von Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart, Germany.
31. _. 1911. Die Gliederung von Prunus subgen. Padus. Verhandhunben des botanischen Vereins der Provinz Brandenburg. Berlin. 52: 101-108.
32. KOMAROV, V. L. 1971. Rosaceae: Rosoideae, Amygdaloideae. In Flora of the U.S.S.R, vol. 10, 1-512. English translation. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., USA.
33. LANDON, J. W. 1975. A new name for Osmaronia cerasiformis (Rosaceae). Taxon 24: 200.
34. LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Stockholm, Sweden.
35. _. 1754. Genera plantarum, 5th ed. Stockholm, Sweden.
36. MABBERLEY, D. J. 1997. The plant-book, a portable dictionary of the vascular plants, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
37. MAI, D. H. 1984. Karpologische untersuchungen der Steinkerne fossiler und rezenter Amygdalaceae (Rosales). Feddes Repertorium 95: 299-329.
38. MCVAUGH, R. 1951. A revision of the North American black cherries (Prunus serotina Ehrh., and relatives). Brittonia 7: 279-315.
39. MILLER, P. 1754. The gardener's dictionary, 4th ed. London, UK.
40. MORGAN, D. R., D. E. SOLTIS, AND K. R. ROBERTSON. 1994. Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. American Journal of Botany 81: 890-903.
41. MOWREY, B. D., AND D. J. WERNER. 1990. Phylogenetic relationships among species of Prunus as inferred by isozyme markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80: 129-133.
42. RADFORD, A. E., H. E. AHLES, AND C. R. BELL. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
43. REHDER, A. 1915. Synopsis of the Chinese species of Pyrus. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 50: 226-239.
44. _. 1940. A manual of cultivated trees and shrubs hardy in North America exclusive of the subtropical and warmer temperate regions, 2nd ed. Macmillan, New York, New York, USA.
45. ROEMER, M. J. 1847. Familiarum naturalium regni vegetabilis synopses monographicae 4. Weimar.
46. RYDBERG, P. A. 1918. Rosaceae (conclusion). In North American flora, vol. 22, 481-533. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA.
47. SAITOU, N., AND M. NEI. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 406-425.
48. SCHNEIDER, C. K. 1912. Illustriertes Handbuch der Laubholzkunde, vol. 2. Jena.
49. SCHULZE-MENZ, G. K. 1964. Rosaceae. In H. Melchior [ed.], Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzen-familien, vol. 2, 209-218. Gebrueder Borntraeger, Berlin, Germany.
50. STERLING, C. 1963. The affinities of Prinsepia (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 50: 693-699.
51. _. 1964a. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. I. Amygdaloideae: Prunus. American Journal of Botany 51: 36-44.
52. _. 1964b. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. II. Amygdaloideae: Maddenia, Pygeum, Osmaronia. American Journal of Botany 51: 354-360.
53. _. 1966. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. IX. Spiraeoideae: Quillajeae, Sorbarieae. American Journal of Botany 53: 951-960.
54. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1999. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
55. _, G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable [eds.], Molecular systematics, 2nd ed., 407-514. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
56. TAKHTAJAN, A. L. 1987. Systema Magnoliophytorum. Academy of Sciences U.S.S.R., Leningrad, Russia.
57. _. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
58. THORNE, R. F. 1983. Proposed new realignments of the angiosperms. Nordic Journal of Botany 3: 85-117.
59. _. 1992a. An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365-389.
60. _. 1992b. Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Botanical Review 58: 225-348.
61. UEMATSU, C., T. SASAKUMA, AND Y. OGIHARA. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships in the stone-fruit group of Prunus as revealed by restriction fragment analysis of chloroplast DNA. Japanese Journal of Genetics 66:59-69.
62. WEBB, L. J. 1968. Environmental relationships of the structural types of Australian rain forest vegetation. Ecology 49: 269-331.
63. WEN, J., AND E. A. ZIMMER. 1996. Phylogeny and biogeography of Panax L. (the ginseng genus, Araliaceae): inferences from ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6: 166-177.
64. WILF, P. 1997. When are leaves good thermometers? A new case for leaf margin analysis. Paleobiology 23: 203-206.
65. WILLIS, J. C. 1985. A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns, 8th ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
66. YOKOTA, Y. T. KAWATA, Y. IIDA, A. KATO, AND S. TANIFUJI. 1989. Nucleotide sequences of the 5.8S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer regions in carrot and broad bean ribosomal DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 29: 294-301.
67. YÜ, T. T., L. T. LU, T. C. KU, C. L. LI, AND S. X. CHEN. 1986. Rosaceae (3), Amygdaloideae. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 38. Science Press, Beijing, China.
68. ZHANG, S. Y. 1992. Systematic wood anatomy of the Rosaceae. Blumea 37: 81-158.