National diversity of major international journals in the field of communication

Journal of Communication

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 139-151

  Lauf, Edmund ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 16344372292     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/joc/55.1.139     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (2004). About. Retrieved June 15, 2004, from http://www.aejmc.org/.
2. Bilandzic, H., Lauf, E., & Hartmann, T. (2004). How to go international. DGPuK-Wegweiser zu internationalen Tagungen und Fachzeitschriften in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Filderstadt, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft.
3. Clyne, M. (1987). Cultural differences in the organization of academic texts: English and German. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 211-247.
4. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (2004). Information in English language. Retrieved June 15, 2004, from http://www.dgpuk.de/
5. Dyer, C. S. (1998). The Iowa guide: Scholarly journals in mass communication and related fields. Ames: University of Iowa.
6. Dyer, C. S. (2003). The Iowa guide: Scholarly journals in mass communication and related fields. Online edition. Retrieved September 5, 2003, from http://fmp2.its.uiowa.edu/iowaguide/indexpage.html
7. Fandrych, C., & Graefen, G. (2002). Text commenting devices in German and English academic articles. Multilingua, 21, 17-43.
8. Funkhouser, E. T. (1996). The evaluative use of citation analysis for communication journals. Human Communication Research, 22, 563-574.
9. Galtung, J. (1981). Structure, culture and intellectual style: An essay comparing Saxonic, Teutonic, Gallic and Nipponic approaches. Social Science Information, 20, 817-856.
10. Global Communication Research Association (2003). Rationale. Retrieved October 24, 2003, from http://www.mucic.mq.edu.au/GCRA/ rationale.html.
11. Grupp, H., Schmoch, U., & Hinze, S. (2001). International alignment and scientific regard as macroindicators for international comparisons of publications. Scientometrics, 51, 359-380.
12. Inönü, E. (2003). The influence of cultural factors on scientific production. Scientometrics, 56, 137-146.
13. Institute for Scientific Information (2003a). The journal citation report. Retrieved September 5, 2003, from http://jcrweb.com.
14. Institute for Scientific Information (2003b). The journal selection process. Retrieved December 15, 2003, from http://www.isinet.com/ essays/selectionofmaterialforcoverage/199701.html.
15. Institute for Scientific Information (2004a). Research products. Retrieved June 15, 2004, from http://www.isinet.com/rsg/.
16. Institute for Scientific Information (2004b). Scope notes. Social Science Citation Index. Retrieved June 15, 2004, from http:// www.isinet.com/journals/scope/scope_ssci.html.
17. International Communication Association (2002, September). ICA Newsletter. Retrieved May 15, 2004, from http://www.icahdq.org/ publicnewsletter/2002/sept2002_Newsletter1.pdf
18. Kamhawi, R., & Weaver, D. (2003). Mass communication research trends from 1980 to 1999. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 7-27.
19. Lau, T. (1995). Chinese communication studies: A citation analysis of Chinese communication research in English-language journals. Scientometrics, 33, 65-91.
20. Leydesdorff, L. (2000). Is the European Union becoming a single publication system? Scientometrics, 47, 265-280.
21. Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Top-down de composition of the Journal Citation Report of the Social Science Citation Index: Graph- and factor-analytical approaches. Scientometrics, 60, 159-180.
22. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of interooder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587-604.
23. Luwel, M. (1999). Is the science citation index U.S.-biased? Scientometrics, 46, 549-562.
24. McDonald, D. G., & Dimmick, J. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of diversity. Communication Research, 30, 60-79.
25. Müller, R. A. E., & Sumner, D. A. (1999). Output counts: Comparing the published contributions by agricultural economists across countries. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 26, 533-548.
26. Rey-Rocha, J., & Martin-Sempere, M. J. (2004). Patterns of the foreign contributions in some domestic vs. international journals on earth sciences. Scientometrics, 59, 95-115.
27. Rice, R. E., Chapin, J., Pressman, R., Park, S., & Funkhouser, E. (1996). What's in a name? Bibliometric analysis of 40 years of the Journal of Broadcasting (& Electronic Media). Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40. 511-539.
28. Riffe, D., & Freitag, A. (1997). A content analysis of content analyses: Twenty-five years of Journalism Quarterly. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 515-524.
29. Schweitzer, J. C. (1988). Research article productivity by mass communication scholars. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 479-484.
30. So, C. Y. K. (1988). Citation patterns of core communication journals. An assessment of the development status of communication. Human Communication Research, 15, 236-266.
31. Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51, 335-346.
32. Vessuri, H. (2001). Science and its cultures. International Social Science Journal, 53, 179-185.
33. Yang, L., & Kaid, L. L. (2000). Fragmentation of the intellectual structure of political communication study: Some empirical evidence. Scientometrics, 47, 143-164.