A four-gene study of evolutionary relationships in Solanum section Acanthophora

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 603-612

  Levin, Rachel A ^a,b   Watson, Kimberly ^a,c   Bohs, Lynn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b AMHERST COLLEGE   (United States)

^c NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

Acanthophora; GBSSI; ITS; Solanaceae; Solanum; trnS trnG; trnT trnF; Waxy

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENETICS;

ACANTHOPHORA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MELONGENA; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM; SOLANUM MELONGENA; SPINY;

EID: 16244403964     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.4.603     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. BALDWIN, B. G. 1992. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 3-16.
2. BALDWIN, B. G., M. J. SANDERSON, J. M. PORTER, M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, C. S. CAMPBELL, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
3. BARKER, F. K., AND F. M. LUTZONI. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Systematic Biology 51: 625-637.
4. BOHS, L. 2004. A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of Solanum section Lasiocarpa. Systematic Botany 29: 177-187.
5. BOHS, L. In press. Major clades in Solanum based on ndhF sequence data. In V. Hollowell, R. Keating, W. Lewis, and T. Croat [eds.], Solanaceae, William D'Arcy Memorial, Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
6. BOHS, L., AND R. G. OLMSTEAD. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships in Solanum (Solanaceae) based on ndhF sequences. Systematic Botany 22: 5-17.
7. BOHS, L., AND R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2001. A reassessment of Normania and Triguera (Solanaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 228: 33-48.
8. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
9. BRYSON, C. T., AND J. D. BYRD. 1994. Solanum viarum (Solanaceae), new to Mississippi. Sida 16: 382-385.
10. BUKENYA, Z. R., AND J. F. CARASCO. 1999. Ethnobotanical aspects of Solanum L. (Solanaceae) in Uganda. In M. Nee, D. E. Symon, R. N. Lester, and J. P. Jessop [eds.], Solanaceae IV. Advances in biology and utilization, 345-360. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK.
11. CIPOLLINI, M. L., L. A. BOHS, K. MINK, E. PAULK, AND K. BÖHNING-GAESE. 2002. Patterns of secondary compounds within fleshy fruits: ecology and phylogeny. In D. J. Levey, W. R. Silva, and M. Galetti [eds.], Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology, evolution and conservation, 111-128. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
12. CIPOLLINI, M. L., AND D. J. LEVEY. 1997. Secondary metabolites of fleshy vertebrate-dispersed fruits: adaptive hypotheses and implications for seed dispersal. American Naturalist 150: 346-372.
13. DOLPHIN, K., R. BELSHAW, D. L. C. ORME, AND D. L. J. QUICKE. 2000. Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17: 401-406.
14. DONOGHUE, M. J., R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 333-345.
15. DOWTON, M., AND A. D. AUSTIN. 2002. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy: the behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Systematic Biology 51: 19-31.
16. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
17. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Systematic Biology 44: 570-572.
18. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
19. GOLDBLATT, P., AND D. JOHNSON. 2004. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Available at website, http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/Search/ipcn. html.
20. GOLDMAN, N., J. P. ANDERSON, AND A. G. RODRIGO. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 49: 652-670.
21. HAMILTON, M. B. 1999. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Molecular Ecology 8: 513-525.
22. HERSHKOVITZ, M. A., AND E. A. ZIMMER. 1996. Conservation patterns in angiosperm rDNA ITS2 sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 2857-2867.
23. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 2000. MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
24. MASON-GAMER, R. J., C. F. WEIL, AND E. A. KELLOGG. 1998. Granule-bound starch synthase: structure, function, and phylogenetic utility. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 1658-1673.
25. MILLER, R. E., M. D. RAUSCHER, AND P. S. MANOS. 1999. Phylogenetic systematics of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) based on ITS and waxy. Systematic Botany 24: 209-227.
26. NEE, M. 1979a. A revision of Solanum section Acanthophora. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
27. NEE, M. 1979b. Patterns in biogeography in Solanum, section Acanthophora. In J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester, and A. D. Skelding [eds.], The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae, 569-580. Academic Press, London, UK.
28. NEE, M. 1991. Synopsis of Solanum section Acanthophora: a group of interest for glycoalkaloids. In J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester, M. Nee, and N. Estrada-R. [eds.], Solanaceae III. Taxonomy, chemistry, evolution, 257-266. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK.
29. PERALTA, I. E., AND D. M. SPOONER. 2001. Granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene phylogeny of wild tomatoes (Solanum L. section Lycopersicon [Mill.] Wettst. subsection Lycopersicon). American Journal of Botany 88: 1888-1902.
30. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
31. RAMBAUT, A. 1996. Se-Al: Sequence alignment editor, version 1.0a1. Available at website, http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/.
32. SHIMODAIRA, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1114-1116.
33. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
34. TABERLET, P., L. GIELLY, G. PAUTOU, AND J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
35. VAN DER LEIJ, F. R., R. G. F. VISSER, A. S. POSTEIN, E. JACOBSEN, AND W. J. FEENSTRA. 1991. Sequence of the structural gene for granule-bound starch synthase of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and evidence for a single point deletion in the amf allele. Molecular and General Genetics 228: 240-248.
36. WALSH, B. M., AND S. B. HOOT. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of Capsicum (Solanaceae) using DNA sequences from two noncoding regions: the chloroplast atpB-rbcL spacer region and nuclear waxy introns. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 1409-1418.
37. WHALEN, M. D. 1984. Conspectus of species groups in Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum. Gentes Herbarum 12: 179-282.
38. WHITE, T. J., T. BRUNS, S. LEE, AND J. TAYLOR. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In M. Innis, D. Gelfand, J. Sninsky, and T. White [eds.], PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, 315-322. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
39. WUNDERLIN, R. P., B. F. HANSEN, K. R. DELANEY, M. NEE, AND J. J. MULLAHEY. 1993. Solanum viarum and S. tampicense (Solanaceae): two weedy species new to Florida and the United States. Sida 15: 605-611.