The influence of perceived rotary motion on the recognition of rotated objects

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 140-146

  Jolicoeur, Pierre ^a   Corballis, Michael C ^b   Lawson, Rebecca ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000882625     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03209470     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & EDELMAN, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 60-64.
2. COOPER, L. A., & SHEPARD, R. N. (1973). Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 75-176). New York: Academic Press.
3. CORBALLIS, M. C. (1982). Mental rotation: Anatomy of a paradigm. In M. Potegal (Ed.), Spatial abilities: Developmental and physiological foundations (pp. 173-198). New York: Academic Press.
4. CORBALLIS, M. C. (1986). On imagined revolutions. In D. F. Marks (Ed.), Theories of image formation (pp. 151-168). New York: Brandon House.
5. CORBALLIS, M. C. (1988). Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review, 95, 115-123.
6. CORBALLIS, M. C., & BLACKMAN, A. R. (1990). The effect of apparent movement on mental rotation. Memory & Cognition, 18, 551-555.
7. CORBALLIS, M. C., & MCLAREN, R. (1982). Interaction between perceived and imagined rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 215-224.
8. CORBALLIS, P. M., & CORBALLIS, M. C. (1993). The effect of apparent motion on mental rotation: Push or pull? Memory & Cognition, 21, 458-466.
9. HEIL, M., BAJRIĆ, J., RÖSLER, F., & HENNIGHAUSEN, E. (1997). A rotation aftereffect changes both the speed and the preferred direction of mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 681-692.
10. HINTON, G. E. (1981). A parallel computation that assigns canonical object-based frames of reference. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 683-685). Los Altos, CA: Kaufman.
11. JOLICOEUR, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
12. JOLICOEUR, P. (1988). Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 461-478.
13. JOLICOEUR, P. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dual-systems theory. Mind & Language, 5, 387-410.
14. JOLICOEUR, P., & CAVANAGH, P. (1992). Mental rotation, physical rotation, and input channels in vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 371-384.
15. JOLICOEUR, P., & MILLIKEN, B. (1989). Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 200-210.
16. MAKI, R. H. (1986). Naming and locating the tops of rotated pictures. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 368-387.
17. MURRAY, J. E. (1995). Imagining and naming rotated natural objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 239-243.
18. MURRAY, J. E., JOLICOEUR, P., MCMULLEN, P. A., & INGLETON, M. (1993). Orientation invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 21, 604-610.
19. SHEPARD, R. N., & COOPER, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. SHWARTZ, S. P. (1981). The perception of disoriented complex objects. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
21. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.
22. TARR, M. J., & PINKER, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.