Stresses developed during clinical debonding of stainless steel orthodontic brackets

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 39-46

  Katona, Thomas R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Debonding; Dental stress analysis; Orthodontic brackets

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; RESIN; STAINLESS STEEL; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; ELASTICITY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; INJURY; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; ROTATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMODYNAMICS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADHESIVES; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; ROTATION; STAINLESS STEEL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0030635632     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Storm ER. Debonding ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:91-94.
2. Yapel MJ, Quick DC. Experimental traumatic debonding of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 1994;64:131-136.
3. Oliver RG. The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;93:196-200.
4. Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RG, Newcombe RG. A clinical study of amount of adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding, comparing etch times of 15 and 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989;95:415-421.
5. Odegaard J. Debonding ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1989;23:632-635.
6. Bishara SE, Fehr DE, Jakobsen JR. A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 104:170-179.
7. Bishara SE, Fonseca JM, Fehr DE, Boyer DB. Debonding forces applied to ceramic brackets simulating clinical conditions. Angle Orthod 1994;64:277-282.
8. Miles PG, Pontier J-P, Bahiraei D, Close J. The effect of carbamine peroxide bleach on the tensile bond strength of ceramic brackets: An in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 106:371-375.
9. McCarthy MF, Hondrum SO. Mechanical and bond strength properties of light-cured and chemically-cured glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;105:135-141.
10. Martin S, Garcia-Godoy F. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cemented with a zinc oxide-polyvinyl cement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;106:615-620.
11. Wiltshire WA. Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;106:127-130.
12. Merrill SW, Oesterle LJ, Hermesch CB. Ceramic bracket bonding: A comparison of shear, tensile, and torsional bond strengths of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;106:290-297.
13. Katona TR, Moore BK. The effects of load misalignment on tensile load testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets: A finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;105:543-551.
14. Katona TR. The effects of load location and misalignment on shear/peel testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets: A finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;106:395-402.
15. Craig RG, editor. Restorative Dental Materials. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1989.
16. Cook PA, Youngson CC. An in vitro study of the bond strength of a glass ionomer cement in the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthod 1988;15:247-253.
17. Katona TR, Batterman SC. Surface roughness effects on the stress analysis of adhesive joints. Int J Adhesion and Adhesives 1983;3:85-91.