Cell cycle regulation through ubiquitin/proteasome-mediated proteolysis in plants

Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-4

  Yanagawa, Yuki ^a,c   Kimura, Seisuke ^b  

^a CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGROBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

26S proteasome; CDK; Cyclin

Indexed keywords

EID: 15944406091     PISSN: 00213551     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.6090/jarq.39.1     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Cockcroft, C. E. et al. (2000) Cyclin D control of growth rate in plants. Nature, 405, 575-579.
2. Dewitte, W. & Murray, J. A. (2003) The plant cell cycle. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 54, 235-264.
3. Dornan, D. et al. (2004) The ubiquitin ligase COP1 is a critical negative regulator of p53. Nature, 429, 86-92.
4. Genschik, P. et al. (1998) Cell cycle-dependent proteolysis in plants. Identification of the destruction box pathway and metaphase arrest produced by the proteasome inhibitor mg132. Plant Cell, 10, 2063-2076.
5. Glickman, M. H. et al. (1998) A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3. Cell, 94, 615-623.
6. King, R. W. et al. (1996) How proteolysis drives the cell cycle. Science, 274, 1652-1659.
7. Lyapina, S. et al. (2001) Promotion of NEDD-CUL1 conjugate cleavage by COP9 signalosome. Science, 292, 1382-1385.
8. Mironov, V. V. et al. (1999) Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell division in plants - the nexus. Plant Cell, 11, 509-522.
9. Mittnacht, S. (1998) Control of pRB phosphorylation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 8, 21-27.
10. Nigg, E. A. (1995) Cyclin-dependent protein kinases: key regulators of the eukaryotic cell cycle. Bioessays, 17, 471-480.
11. Oka, M. et al. (2004) Inhibition of proteasome by MG-132 treatment causes extra phragmoplast formation and cortical microtubule disorganization during M/G1 transition in synchronized tobacco cells. Plant Cell Physiol., 45, 1623-1632.
12. Planchais, S., Samland, A. K. & Murray, J. A. (2004) Differential stability of Arabidopsis D-type cyclins: CYCD3;1 is a highly unstable protein degraded by a proteasome-dependent mechanism. Plant J., 38, 616-625.
13. Serino, G. & Deng, X. W. (2003) The COP9 signalosome: regulating plant development through the control of proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 54, 165-182.
14. Tanaka, K. & Chiba, T. (1998) The proteasome: a protein-destroying machine. Genes Cells, 3, 499-510.
15. Vandepoele, K. et al. (2002) Genome-wide analysis of core cell cycle genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 14, 903-916.
16. Vierstra, R. D. (2003) The ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway, the complex last chapter in the life of many plant proteins. Trends Plant Sci., 8, 135-142.
17. Weingartner, M. et al. (2004) Expression of a nondegradable cyclin B1 affects plant development and leads to endomitosis by inhibiting the formation of a phragmoplast. Plant Cell, 16, 643-657.
18. Weingartner, M. et al. (2003) A plant cyclin B2 is degraded early in mitosis and its ectopic expression shortens G2-phase and alleviates the DNA-damage checkpoint. J. Cell Sci., 116, 487-498.
19. Yamamoto, T. et al. (2004) Degradation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen by 26S proteasome in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta, 218, 640-646.
20. Yanagawa, Y. et al. (2002) Cell-cycle dependent dynamic change of 26S proteasome distribution in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Cell Physiol., 43, 604-613.
21. Yanagawa, Y. et al. (2004) Arabidopsis COP10 forms a complex with DDB1 and DET1 and enhances the activity of ubiquitin conjugating enzymes. Genes Dev., 18, 2172-2181.