Exploring rate variation among and within sites in a densely sampled tree: Species level phylogenetics of North American tiger beetles (Genus Cicindela)

Systematic Biology

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 4-20

  Vogler, Alfried P ^a,b   Cardoso, Anabela ^a,c   Barraclough, Timothy G ^b,d  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^d JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coleoptera; Heterotachy; Homoplasy weighting; mtDNA; Nodal support; Rate variation; Saturation; Species level phylogenies

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; CODON; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NORTH AMERICA; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BEETLES; CLASSIFICATION; CODON; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 15944376223     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150590906028     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baker, R. H., G. S. Wilkinson, and R. DeSalle. 2001. Phylogenetic utility of different types of molecular data used to infer evolutionary relationships among stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Syst. Biol. 50:87-105.
2. Barker, F. K., and F. M. Lutzoni. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51:625-637.
3. Barraclough, T. G., J. E. Hogan, and A. P. Vogler. 1999. Testing whether ecological factors promote cladogenesis in a group of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B 266:1061-1067.
4. Barraclough, T. G., and S. Nee. 2001. Phylogenetics and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:391-399.
5. Barraclough, T. G., and A. P. Vogler. 2002. Recent diversification rates in North American tiger beetles (genus Cicindela). Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1706-1716.
6. Börklund, M. 1999. Are third positions really that bad? A test using vertebrate cytochrome b. Cladistics 15:191-195.
7. Boyd, H. P. 1982. Checklist of Cicindelidae: The tiger beetles. Plexus Publishing, Inc., Marlton, New Jersey.
8. Cognato, A. I., and A. P. Vogler. 2001. Exploring data interaction and nucleotide alignment in a multiple gene analysis of Ips (Coleoptera: Scolytinae). Syst. Biol. 50:758-780.
9. Collins, T. M., F. Kraus, and G. Estabrook. 1994. Compositional effects and weighting of nucleotide-sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:449-459.
10. Cunningham, C. W. 1997. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Syst. Biol. 46:464-478.
11. Darlu, P., and G. Lecointre. 2002. When does the incongruence length difference test fail? Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:432-437.
12. DeBry, R. W. 2001. Improving interpretation of the decay index for DNA sequence data. Syst. Biol. 50:742-752.
13. Dolphin, K., R. Belshaw, C. D. L. Orme, and D. J. L. Quicke. 2000. Noise and incongruence: Interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17:401-406.
14. Duran, D. P., and A. P. Vogler. 2005. Taxonomic changes in North American Cicindela (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Coleopterists Bull. In preparation.
15. Farris, J. S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18:374-385.
16. Farris, J. S., M. Källersjö, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-320.
17. Fitch, W. F. 1971. The nonidentity of invariable positions in the cytochrome c of different species. Biochem. Genet. 5:231-241.
18. Freitag, R. 1965. A revision of the North American species of the Cicindela maritima group with a study of hybridization between Cicindela duodecimguttata and oregona. Quaest. Entomol. 1:87-170.
19. Gatesy, J., P. O'Grady, and R. H. Baker. 1999. Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: Hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level Artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics 15:271-313.
20. Goldman, N. 1998. Phylogenetic information and experimental design in molecular systematics. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B 265:1779-1786.
21. Goloboff, P. A. 1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9:83-91.
22. Kallersjo, M., V. A. Albert, and J. S. Farris. 1999. Homoplasty increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15:91-93.
23. Lockhart, P. J., D. Huson, U. Maier, M. J. Fraunholz, Y. v. d. Peer, A. C. Barbrook, C. J. howe, and M. A. Steel. 2000. How molecules evolve in eubacteria. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:835-838.
24. Mitchell, A., C. Mitter, and J. C. Regier. 2000. More taxa or more characters revisited: Combining data from nuclear protein-encoding genes for phylogenetic analyses of Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Syst. Biol. 49:202-224.
25. Miyamoto, M. M., and W. M. Fitch. 1995. Testing the covarion hypothesis of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:503-513.
26. Pearson, D. L., T. G. Barraclough, and A. P. Vogler. 1997. Distributional maps for North American species of tiger beetles. Cicindela 29:33-84.
27. Pearson, D. L., M. S. Blum, T. H. Jones, H. M. Fales, E. Gonda, and B. R. White. 1988. Historical perspective and the interpretation of ecological patterns: Defensive compounds of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Am. Nat. 132:404-416.
28. Pearson, D. L., and A. P. Vogler. 2001. Tiger beetles: The ecology and evolution of the Cicindelidae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
29. Philippe, H., D. Casane, S. Gribaldo, P. Lopez, and J. Meunier. 2003. Heterotachy and functional shift in protein evolution. IUBMB Life 55:257-265.
30. Rambaut, A., and N. C. Grassly. 1997. Seq-Gen: An application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Applic. Biosci. 13:235-238.
31. Rivalier, E. 1950. Démembrement du genre Cicindela Linné. Rev. Franc. Entomol. 17:217-244.
32. Rivalier, E. 1954. Démembrement du genre Cicindela Linné. II. Faune americaine. Rev. Franc. Entomol. 21:249-268.
33. Rivalier, E. 1963. Démembrement du genre Cicindela Linné. V. Faune australienne. Rev. Franc. Entomol. 30:30-48.
34. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd edition. W. H. Freeman, New York.
35. Sorenson, M. D. 1999. Treerot version 2.0. Boston University, Boston, MA.
36. Sota, T., and A. P. Vogler. 2001. Incongruence of mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees in the carabid beetles Ohomopterus. Syst. Biol. 50:39-59.
37. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olson, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular Systematics (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
38. Vogler, A. P., and P. Z. Goldstein. 1997. Adaptation, cladogenesis, and the evolution of habitat association in North American tiger beetles: A phylogenetic perspective. Pages 353-373 in Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation (T. Givnish, and K. Systma, eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
39. Vogler, A. P., and C. K. Kelley. 1998. Covariation of defensive traits in Cicindela tiger beetles: A phylogenetic approach using mtDNA. Evolution 52:529-538.
40. Vogler, A. P., and A. Welsh. 1997. Phylogeny of North American Cicindela tiger beetles inferred from multiple mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:225-235.
41. Vogler, A. P., A. Welsh, and T. G. Barraclough. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of the Cicindela maritima group (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) indicates fast radiation in western North America. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91:185-194.
42. Walsh, H. E., M. G. Kidd, T. Moum, and V. L. Friesen. 1999. Polytomies and the power of phylogenetic inference. Evolution 53:932-937.
43. Wenzel, J. W., and M. E. Siddall. 1999. Noise. Cladistics 15:51-64.
44. Willis, H. L. 1967. Bionomics and zoogeography of tiger beetles of saline habitats in the central United States (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 47:145-313.
45. Yang, Z. H. 1998. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 47:125-133.
46. Yoder, A. D., J. A. Irwin, and B. A. Payseur. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50:408-424.