Race, sex, and clarence thomas: Representation change in the EEOC

Public Administration Review

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 171-179

  Meier, Kenneth J ^a   Pennington, Michael S ^b   Eller, Warren S ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 15944372315     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00442.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Breusch, T., and A. Pagan. 1980. The LM Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. Review of Economic Studies 47(1): 239-54.
2. Brown, Deryck R. 1999. Ethnic Politics and Public Sector Management in Trinidad and Guyana. Public Administration and Development 19(4): 367-79.
3. Dolan, Julie. 2000. The Senior Executive Service: Gender, Attitudes and Representative Bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(3): 513-29.
4. _. 2002. The Budget-Minimizing Bureaucrat? Empirical Evidence from the Senior Executive Service. Public Administration Review 62(1): 42-50.
5. Dolan, Kathleen. 1998. Voting from Women in the "Year of the Woman." American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 272-93.
6. Freeman, Jo. 1975. The Politics of Women's Liberation: A Case Study of an Emerging Social Movement and its Relation to the Policy Process. New York: David McKay Co.
7. Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Richard Vengroff. 1997. Representative Bureaucracy, Tokenism and the Glass Ceiling: The Case of Women in Quebec Municipal Administration. Canadian Public Administration 40(4): 457-80.
8. Greene, William H. 2000. Econometric Analysis. 4th ed. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Henry, Nicholas. 2001. Public Administration and Public Affairs. 8th ed. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Hindera, John J. 1993a. Representative Bureaucracy: Imprimis Evidence of Active Representation in the EEOC District Offices. Social Science Quarterly 74(1): 95-108.
11. _. 1993b. Representative Bureaucracy: Further Evidence of Active Representation in the EEOC District Offices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3(4): 415-29.
12. Keiser, Lael R., Vicky M. Wilkins, Kenneth J. Meier, and Catherine Holland. 2002. Lipstick or Logarithms: Gender, Identity, Institutions and Representative Bureaucracy. American Political Science Review 96(3): 553-64.
13. Kelly, Rita Mae, and Meredith A. Newman. 2001. The Gendered Bureaucracy: Agency Mission, Equality of Opportunity, and Representative Bureaucracies. Women and Politics 22(3): 1-34.
14. Kim, Pan S. 1996. Disability Policy: An Analysis of the Employment of People with Disabilities in the American Government. Public Personnel Management 25(1): 73.
15. Meier, Kenneth J. 1993. Representative Bureaucracy: A Theoretical and Empirical Exposition. In Research in Public Administration, edited by James Perry, 1-36. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16. _. 2000. Politics and the Bureaucracy. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
17. Meier, Kenneth J., and John Bohte. 2001. Structure and Discretion: Missing Links in Representative Bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(4): 455-70.
18. Meier, Kenneth J., and Lloyd G. Nigro. 1976. Representative Bureaucracy and Policy Preferences. Public Administration Review 36(4): 458-69.
19. Meier, Kenneth J., and Joseph Stewart, Jr. 1991. The Politics of Hispanic Education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20. Meier, Kenneth J., Joseph Stewart, Jr., and Robert E. England. 1989. Race, Class, and Education: The Politics of Second Generation Discrimination. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
21. Moe, Terry M. 1985. Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: The Case of the NLRB. American Political Science Review 79(4): 1094-1116.
22. Mosher, Frederick. 1968. Democracy and the Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Naff, Katherine C. 1998. Progress Toward Achieving a Representative Bureaucracy. Public Personnel Management 27(2): 135-50.
24. Naff, Katherine C., and John Crum. 2000. The President and Representative Bureaucracy: Rhetoric and Reality. Public Administration Review 60(3): 98-109.
25. Overby, L. Marvin, Beth M. Henschen, Michael H. Walsh, and Julie Strauss. 1992. Courting Constituents? An Analysis of the Senate Confirmation Vote on Justice Clarence Thomas. American Political Science Review 86(4): 997-1003.
26. Paolino, Phillip. 1995. Group-Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections. American Journal of Political Science 39(2): 294-313.
27. Riccucci, Norma M., and Judith R. Saidel. 1997. The Representativeness of State-Level Bureaucratic Leaders. Public Administration Review 57(5): 423-30.
28. _. 2001, The Demographics of Gubernatorial Appointees. Policy Studies Journal 29(1): 11-22.
29. Romzek, Barbara, and J. Stephen Hendricks. 1982. Organizational Involvement and Representative Bureaucracy: Can We Have It Both Ways? American Political Science Review 76(1): 75-82.
30. Rucinski, Dianne. 1993. A Review: Rush to Judgment? Fast Reaction Polls in the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas Controversy. Public Opinion Quarterly 57(4): 575-92.
31. Selden, Sally C. 1997. The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
32. Selden, Sally C., and Frank Selden. 2001. Rethinking Diversity in Public Organizations for the 21st Century. Administration and Society 33(3): 303-29.
33. Sigelman, Lee, and James S. Todd. 1992. Clarence Thomas, Black Pluralism, and Civil Rights Policy. Political Science Quarterly 107(2): 231-34.
34. Subramanian, V. 1967. Representative Bureaucracy: A Reassessment. American Political Science Review 61(3): 1010-19.
35. Thielemann, Gregory S., and Joseph Stewart, Jr. 1996. A Demand Side Perspective on the Importance of Representative Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review 56(2): 168-3.
36. Thomas, Dan, Craig McCoy, and Allan McBride. 1993. Deconstructing the Political Spectacle: Sex, Race, and Subjectivity in Public Response to the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill "Sexual Harassment" Hearings. American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 699-720.
37. Thompson, James D. 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38. Van Riper, Paul. 1958. History of the United States Civil Service. New York; Harper and Row.
39. Wilkins, Vicky M., and Lael R. Keiser. 2001. Linking Passive and Active Representation by Gender: The Case of Child Support Agencies. Paper presented at the Sixth National Public Management Research Conference, October 18-20, Bloomington, IN.
40. Wood, B. Dan. 1990. Does Politics Make a Difference at the EEOC? American Journal of Political Science 34(2): 503-30.
41. Wood, B. Dan, and Alesha Doan. 2001. The Politics of Problem Definition: A Theory and Application to Sexual Harassment. Unpublished manuscript, Texas A&M University.
42. Wood, B. Dan, and Richard Waterman. 1994. Bureaucratic Dynamics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
43. Yishai, Yael, and Aaron Cohen. 1997. (Un)representative Bureaucracy: Women in the Israeli Senior Civil Service. Administration and Society 28(1): 441-65.
44. Zellner, Arnold. 1962. An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57(2): 348-68.
45. _. 1963. Estimators for Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations: Some Exact Finite Sample Results. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(4): 977-92.