-
1
-
-
85033637350
-
-
note
-
1. The ADA essentially provides that no covered entity shall discriminate against a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability in regard to job applications procedures, hiring, advancement, or discharge of employees, employee compensation, job training and other terms, conditions and privileges of employment.
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
85050332158
-
Implementing the Americans with disabilities act of 1990: Assessing the variables of success
-
March/April
-
2. The employer is not required to lower the performance standards of the position. Nor is the employer required to make such extensive accommodations that the result is undue financial hardship. Peter C. Bishop and Augustus J. Jones, Jr., "Implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Assessing the Variables of Success," Public Administration Review, 53 (March/April 1993), p. 122.
-
(1993)
Public Administration Review
, vol.53
, pp. 122
-
-
Bishop, P.C.1
Jones A.J., Jr.2
-
3
-
-
0003899690
-
-
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
-
3. To be protected under the ADA, one must have a record of, or be regarded as having a substantial (i.e., one that significantly limits or restricts a major life activity such as hearing, seeing, speaking, walking, breathing, performing manual tasks, caring for oneself, learning, or working), as opposed to a minor, impairment. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, The Americans With Disabilities Act: Your Employment Rights as an Individual With a Disability (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), 1991, p. 2.
-
(1991)
The Americans With Disabilities Act: Your Employment Rights as an Individual With a Disability
, pp. 2
-
-
-
4
-
-
0011455571
-
The Americans with disabilities act: Equal employment opportunity commission regulations for individuals with disabilities
-
(Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service), January
-
4. Nancy Jones, "The Americans with Disabilities Act: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Regulations for Individuals with Disabilities," CRS Report for Congress (92-83-A) (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service), January, 1992, p. 1.
-
(1992)
CRS Report for Congress (92-83-A)
, pp. 1
-
-
Jones, N.1
-
5
-
-
85033655110
-
-
5. The EEOC regulations do provide more detailed guidance in certain areas, for example, with the definition of "essential functions," the definition of individuals with disabilities, and the definition of direct threat. However, the regulations have been criticized as failing to provide sufficient specific guidance in other areas. This issue has been raised generally concerning the case-by-case approach delineated in the regulations, and more specifically regarding issues raised by collective bargaining agreements, insurance, and worker's compensation. Ibid., p. 10.
-
CRS Report for Congress (92-83-A)
, pp. 10
-
-
-
8
-
-
0011500124
-
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
-
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
-
7. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Annual Report on the Employment of Minorities, Women, and People with Disabilities in the Federal Government (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), 1989, p. 224; and ibid., 1990, p. 283.
-
(1989)
Annual Report on the Employment of Minorities, Women, and People with Disabilities in the Federal Government
, pp. 224
-
-
-
9
-
-
0011409721
-
-
7. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Annual Report on the Employment of Minorities, Women, and People with Disabilities in the Federal Government (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), 1989, p. 224; and ibid., 1990, p. 283.
-
(1990)
Annual Report on the Employment of Minorities, Women, and People with Disabilities in the Federal Government
, pp. 283
-
-
-
10
-
-
0011477820
-
Persons with Disabilities in the U.S.: Statistical Summary
-
Washington, DC." U.S. Congressional Research Service
-
8. Mary F. Smith, "Persons with Disabilities in the U.S.: Statistical Summary." Congress Research Service (CRS) Report for Congress (92-609-EPW) (Washington, DC." U.S. Congressional Research Service), 1992, p. 3; and U.S. Department of Education (Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services), Disability Statistics Abstract No. 4 (Washington, D.C.: U.S Department of Education), May 1992.
-
(1992)
Congress Research Service (CRS) Report for Congress (92-609-EPW)
, pp. 3
-
-
Smith, M.F.1
-
11
-
-
0003539912
-
-
(Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services), (Washington, D.C.: U.S Department of Education), May
-
8. Mary F. Smith, "Persons with Disabilities in the U.S.: Statistical Summary." Congress Research Service (CRS) Report for Congress (92-609-EPW) (Washington, DC." U.S. Congressional Research Service), 1992, p. 3; and U.S. Department of Education (Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services), Disability Statistics Abstract No. 4 (Washington, D.C.: U.S Department of Education), May 1992.
-
(1992)
Disability Statistics Abstract No. 4
-
-
-
13
-
-
84915431819
-
Labor force status and other characteristics of persons with work disability: 1981 to 1988
-
Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office
-
10. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Labor Force Status and Other Characteristics of Persons with Work Disability: 1981 to 1988 (Current Population Report Series P-23-160) (Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office), 1989.
-
(1989)
Current Population Report Series P-23-160
-
-
-
14
-
-
85033641905
-
-
note
-
11. Work disability refers to the following: (1) someone who has a health problem or disability which prevents him/her from working or which limits the kind or amount of work he/she can do; (2) someone who had a service-connected disability or who ever retired or left a job for health reasons; (3) someone who did not work during the period of the survey because of a long-term physical or mental illness or disability which prevents the performance of any kind of work; (4) someone who did not work at all in the previous year because of illness or disability; (5) someone who is under 65 years of age and is covered by Medicare; and (6) someone who is under 65 years of age and is a recipient of Supplemental Social Security Income.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
85033656096
-
-
ibid.
-
12. U.S. Bureau of the Census, ibid.
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
85033647748
-
-
Press Release September 11
-
14. National Organization on Disability, Press Release (September 11, 1991), pp. 1-2.
-
(1991)
, pp. 1-2
-
-
-
19
-
-
0011409337
-
-
ibid.
-
15. U.S. EEOC, ibid., 1990, pp. 294-295.
-
(1990)
, pp. 294-295
-
-
-
20
-
-
85033634832
-
-
Ibid.
-
16. Ibid., p. 280.
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
85033652802
-
-
note
-
17. There are a number of references to numerical percentages which may be presented somewhat differently elsewhere. The reason for these differences is that the data are derived from different sources. For example, CPDF data covers approximately 66 percent of the federal work force. The 1990 data included the 117 agencies that submitted affirmative employment accomplishment reports from October 1989 through September 1990.
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
0011408359
-
-
ibid.
-
18. EEOC, ibid., 1990, p. 280.
-
(1990)
, pp. 280
-
-
-
23
-
-
85050843678
-
The Impact of Disabilities on Federal Career Success
-
July/August
-
19. Gregory B. Lewis and Cheryl L. Allee, "The Impact of Disabilities on Federal Career Success." Public Administration Review, 52 (July/August 1992), pp. 389-397.
-
(1992)
Public Administration Review
, vol.52
, pp. 389-397
-
-
Lewis, G.B.1
Allee, C.L.2
-
26
-
-
0004018941
-
-
22. Distribution of total white-collar federal employees by grade level is as follows: GS-1 (0.1 percent), GS-2 (1.2 percent), GS-3 (4.1 percent), GS-4 (9.2 percent), GS-5 (11.8 percent), GS-6 (6.2 percent), GS-7 (8.4 percent), GS-8 (1.7 percent), GS-9 (8.7 percent), GS-10 (1.9 percent), GS-11 (11.5 percent), GS-12 (12.9 percent), GS/GM-13 (8.9percent), GS/GM-14 (4.8 percent), GS/GM-15 (2.2 percent), and SES (0.5 percent) .EEOC, ibid., 1990, p. 340.
-
(1990)
Public Administration Review
, pp. 340
-
-
-
35
-
-
0011472635
-
How the doubly disabled fare under public policies: A 20-Year perspective
-
Fall
-
31. Richard V. Burkhauser, Robert H. Haveman, and Barbara L. Wolfe, "How the Doubly Disabled Fare Under Public Policies: A 20-Year Perspective," La Follette Policy Report, 5 (Fall 1992), pp. 14-15.
-
(1992)
La Follette Policy Report
, vol.5
, pp. 14-15
-
-
Burkhauser, R.V.1
Robert H Haveman, B.L.W.2
-
38
-
-
84991170383
-
Employment provisions of the Americans with disabilities act: Implications for HRD practices
-
Spring
-
34. Elizabeth W. Freeburg, "Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act: Implications for HRD Practices," Human Resource Development Quarterly, 5 (Spring 1994), pp. 93-98.
-
(1994)
Human Resource Development Quarterly
, vol.5
, pp. 93-98
-
-
Freeburg, E.W.1
|