Future directions in breast imaging

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1674-1677

  Koomen, Marcia ^a   Pisano, Etta D ^a   Kuzmiak, Cherie ^a   Pavic, Dag ^a   McLelland, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHRACYCLINE; TAXANE DERIVATIVE;

BREAST CANCER; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CRYOABLATION; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HYPERTHERMIC THERAPY; LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; REVIEW; ADULT; BREAST TUMOR; CATHETER ABLATION; FEMALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CATHETER ABLATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 15544363551     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.039     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, et al: Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:671-677, 2002
2. Skaane P, Skjennald A: Screen-film mammography versus full field digital mammography with softcopy reading: Randomized trial in a population-based screening population: The Oslo II Study. Radiology 232:197-204, 2004
3. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al: Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205:399-406, 1997
4. Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Skarpathiotakis M, et al: Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical experience. Radiology 228:842-850, 2003
5. Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, et al: Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: Feasibility. Radiology 229:261-268, 2003
6. Baum F, Fischer U, Obenauer S, et al: Computer-aided detection direct digital full-field mammography: Initial results. Eur Radiol 12:3015-3017, 2002
7. Pisano ED, Cole EB, Major S, et al: Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. Radiology 216:820-830, 2000
8. Institute of Medicine: Saving women's lives. Integration and innovation: A framework for progress in early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences, 2004, in press
9. Hendrick RE, Smith RA, Rutledge JH, et al: Benefit of screening mammography in women ages 40-49: A new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22:87-92, 1997
10. Olsen O, Gotzsche PC: Review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 358:1340-1342, 2001
11. Boyle P: Global Summit on mammographic screening. Ann Oncol 14:1159-1160, 2003
12. Green BB, Taplin SH: Breast cancer screening controversies. J Am Board Farm Pract 16:233-241, 2003
13. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Vitak B, et al: The relative contribution of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. Eur J Cancer 39:1755-1760, 2003
14. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen HH, et al: The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer 95:458-469, 2002
15. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al: Beyond randomized controlled trials: Organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724-1731, 2001
16. Mushlin Al, Kouides RW, Shapiro DE: Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: A meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 14:143-153, 1998
17. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27, 825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165-175, 2002
18. American Cancer Society: Breast cancer facts and figures 2003-2004. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society, 2003
19. Christiansen CL, Wang F, Barton MB, et al: Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1657-1666, 2000
20. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, et al: Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338:1089-1096, 1998
21. Toniolo PG, Levitz M, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, et al: A prospective study of endogenous estrogens and breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:190-197, 1995
22. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al: Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292:1317-1325, 2004
23. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al: Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familiar or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427-437, 2004
24. Dowlatshahi K, Francescatti DS, Bloom KJ: Laser therapies for small breast cancers. Am J Surg 184:359-363, 2002
25. Kaufman CS, Bachman B, Littrup PJ, et al: Office-based ultrasound-guided cryoablation of breast fibroadenomas. Am J Surg 184:394-400, 2002
26. Tafra L, Smith SJ, Woodward JE, et al: Pilot study of cryoprobe-assisted breast-conserving surgery for small ultrasound-visible cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 10:1018-1024, 2003
27. Sabel MS, Kaufman CS, Whitworth P, et al: Cryoablation of early-stage breast cancer: Work-in-progress report of a multi-institutional trial. Ann Surg Oncol 11:542-549, 2004
28. Pfleiderer SO, Freesmeyer MG, Marx C, et al: Cryotherapy of breast cancer under ultrasound guidance: Initial results and limitations. Eur Radiol 12:3009-3014, 2002
29. Burak WE, Agnese DM, Povoski SP, et al: Radiofrequency ablation of invasive breast carcinoma followed by delayed surgical excision. Cancer 98:1369-1376, 2003
30. Jeffrey SS, Bridwell RL, Ikeda DM, et al: Radiofrequency ablation of breast cancer: First report of an emerging technology. Arch Surg 134:1064-1068, 1999
31. Izzo F, Thomas R, Delrio P, et al: Radiofrequency ablation in patients with primary breast carcinoma: A pilot study in 26 patients. Cancer 92:2036-2044, 2001
32. Gardner RA, Vargas HI, Block JB, et al: Focused microwave phased array thermotherapy for primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 9:326-332, 2002
33. Wu F, Wang ZB, Cao YD, et al: A randomized clinical trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for the treatment of patients with localized breast cancer. Br J Cancer 89:2227-2233, 2003
34. Gianfelice D, Khiat A, Boulanger Y, et al: Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery as an adjunct to tamoxifen therapy in high-risk surgical patients with breast carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1275-1282, 2003
35. Kuerer H, Newman L, Smith T, et al: Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17:460-469, 1999
36. Rieber A, Zeitler H, Rosenthal H, et al: MRI of breast cancer: Influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity. Br J Radiol 70:452-458, 1997
37. Londero V, Bazzocchi M, Del Frate C, et al: Locally advanced breast cancer: Comparison of mammography, sonography and MR imaging in evaluation of residual disease in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol 14:1371-1379, 2004
38. Rosen EL, Blackwell KL, Baker JA, et al: Accuracy of MRI in the detection of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1275-1282, 2003
39. Martincich L, Montemurro F, De Rosa G, et al: Monitoring response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 83:67-76, 2004