Scale-dependence of movement rates in stream invertebrates

Oikos

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-40

  Englund, Göran ^a   Hambäck, Peter A ^b  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; INVERTEBRATE; MIGRATION; RANDOM WALK METHOD; SCALE EFFECT;

ARTHROPODA; ASELLUS; ASELLUS AQUATICUS; BAETIS; EPHEMEROPTERA; INVERTEBRATA; ISOPODA;

EID: 1542637285     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13024.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allan, D. J. and Feifarek, B. P. 1989. Distances travelled by drifting mayfly nymphs: factors influencing return to the substrate. - J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 8: 322-330.
2. Bach, C. E. 1988. Effects of host plant patch size on herbivore density: underlying mechanisms. - Ecology 69: 1103-1117.
3. Bird, G. A. and Hynes, H. B. N. 1981. Movements of immature insects in a lotie habitat. - Hydrobiologia 77: 103-112.
4. Bishop, J. E. and Hynes, H. B. N. 1969. Upstream movements of the benthic invertebrates in the Speed river, Ontario. - J. Fish. Res. Board, Can. 26: 279-298.
5. Campbell, R. B. 1985. Comparison of the drift of live and dead Baetis nymphs in a weakening water current. - Hydrobiologia 126: 229-236.
6. Cooper, S. D., Walde, S. J. and Peckarsky, B. L. 1990. Prey exchange rates and the impact of predators on prey populations in streams. - Ecology 71: 1503-1514.
7. Cooper, S. D., Diehl, S., Kratz, K. et al. 1998. Implications of scale for patterns and processes in stream ecology. - Aust. J. Ecol. 23: 27-40.
8. Diehl, S., Cooper, S. D., Kratz, K. W. et al. 2001. Effects of multiple predator-induced behaviors on short-term population dynamics in open systems. - Am. Nat. 156: 293-313.
9. Elliott, J. M. 1971. The distances travelled by drifting invertebrates in a Lake District stream. - Oecologia 6: 350-379.
10. Elliott, J. M. 2002. Time spent in the drift by downstream-dispersing invertebrates in a Lake District stream. - Freshwater Biol. 47: 97-106.
11. Englund, G. 1993. Interactions in a lake outlet stream community: direct and indirect effects of net-spinning caddis larvae - Oikos 66: 431-438.
12. Englund, G. 1997. Importance of spatial scale and prey movements in predator caging experiments. - Ecology 78: 2316-2325.
13. Englund, G. and Olsson, T. I. 1996. Treatment effects in a predator caging experiment: influence of predation rate and prey movements. - Oikos 77: 519-528.
14. Englund, G. and Cooper, S. D. 2003. Scale effects and extrapolation in ecological experiments. - Adv. Ecol. Res. 33: 161-213.
15. Englund, G. and Hamback, P. A. 2004. The scale-dependence of emigration rates. - Ecology in press.
16. Englund, G., Sarnelle, O. and Cooper, S. D. 1999. Importance of selection criteria in meta-analyses: an analysis of stream predation experiments. - Ecology 80: 1132-1141.
17. Englund, G., Cooper, S. D. and Sarnelle, O. 2001. Application of a model of scale dependence to quantify scale-domains in open predation experiments. - Oikos 92: 501-514.
18. Fagan, W. F. 2002. Connectivity, fragmentation and extinction risk in dendritic metapopulations. - Ecology 83: 3243-3249.
19. Hanski, I. A. and Gilpin, M. E. 1997. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. - Academic Press.
20. Heino, M. and Hanski, I. 2001. Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. - Am. Nat. 157: 495-511.
21. Hjermann, D. Ø. 2000. Spatial ecology of the bush-cricket Decticus verrucivorus: movement, metapopulation dynamics and genetic variation in patchy and linear habitats. - Univ. of Oslo.
22. Holomuzki, J. R. and Van Loan, A. S. 2002. Effects of structural habitat on drift distance and benthic settlement of the caddisfly, Ceratopsyche sparna. - Hydrobiologia 477: 139-147.
23. Holt, R. D. 1995. Temporal and spatial aspects of food web structure and dynamics. - In: Winemiller, K. O. (ed.), Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman and Hall, pp. 192-200.
24. Kareiva, P. 1985. Finding and losing host plants by Phyllotreta: patch size and surrounding habitat. - Ecology 66: 1809-1816.
25. Kindvall, O. and Petersson, A. 2000. Consequences of modelling interpatch migration as a function of patch geometry when predicting metapopulation extinction risk. - Ecol. Model. 129: 101-109.
26. Lancaster, J., Hildrew, A. G. and Gjerlov, C. 1995. Invertebrate drift and longitudinal transport processes in streams. - Can J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53: 572-582.
27. Larkin, P. A. and McCone, D. W. 1985. An evaluation by field experiments of the McLay model of stream drift. - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42: 909-918.
28. Ledger, M. E., Crowe, A. L. M., Woodward, G. et al. 2002. Is the mobility of stream insects related to their diet. - Archiv für Hydrobiologie 154: 41-59.
29. Malmqvist, B. and Sjöström, P. 1987. Stream drift as a consequence of disturbance by invertebrate predators. - Oecologia (Berlin) 74: 396-403.
30. McIntosh, A. R. and Townsend, C. R. 1998. Do different predators affect distance, direction, and destination of movements by a stream mayfly? - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 1954-1960.
31. McLay, C. 1970. A theory concerning the distance travelled by animals entering the drift of a stream. - J. Fish. Res. Board, Can. 27: 359-370.
32. Oksanen, T. 1990. Exploitation ecosystems in heterogeneous habitat complexes. - Evol. Ecol. 4: 220-234.
33. Peters, R. H. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
34. Petit, S., Moilanen, A., Hanski, I. A. et al. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog frittilary butterfly: movements between habitat patches. - Oikos 92: 491-500.
35. Sih, A. and Wooster, D. E. 1994. Prey behavior, prey dispersal and predator impacts on stream prey. - Ecology 75: 1207-1217.
36. Sih, A., Kats, L. B. and Moore, R. D. 1992. Effects of predatory sunfish on the density, drift, and refuge use of stream salamander larvae. - Ecology 73: 1418-1430.
37. Stamps, J. A., Buechner, M. and Krishnan, V. V. 1987. The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat. - Am. Nat 129: 533-552.
38. Sutcliffe, O. L., Thomas, C. D. and Peggie, D. 1997. Area-dependent migration by ringlet butterflies generates a mixture of patchy population and metapopulation attributes. - Oecologia 109: 229-234.
39. Thomas, C. D. and Kunin, W. E. 1999. The spatial structure of population. - J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 647-657.
40. Turchin, P. 1998. Quantitative analysis of movement. - Sinauer Ass. Inc.
41. Waters, T. F. 1965. Interpretation of invertebrate drift in streams. - Ecology 46: 327-333.
42. Wiens, J. A., Stenseth, N. C., Van Horne, B. et al. 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. - Oikos 66: 369-380.