Effects of structural habitat on drift distance and benthic settlement of the caddisfly, Ceratopsyche sparna

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 477, Issue , 2002, Pages 139-147

  Holomuzki, Joseph R ^a,b   Van Loan, Adria S ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Benthic movements; Ceratopsyche sparna larvae; Cladophora; Drift distance; Drift re entry; Habitat structure; Hydraulic roughness

Indexed keywords

BIOFILMS; GRAVEL; HYDRAULICS; MICROORGANISMS; OCEAN HABITATS; SUBSTRATES;

DRIFTS;

MARINE BIOLOGY;

CADDISFLY; DRIFT BEHAVIOR; FLOW PATTERN; HABITAT STRUCTURE; LARVAL SETTLEMENT; LARVAL TRANSPORT;

CERATOPSYCHE; CERATOPSYCHE SPARNA; CLADOPHORA; HYDROPSYCHIDAE; TRICHOPTERA;

EID: 0036625008     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021073318514     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allan, J. D., 1978. Trout predation and the size composition of stream drift. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23: 1231-1237.
2. Allan, J. D. & B. P. Feifarek, 1989. Distances travelled by drifting mayfly nymphs: Factors influencing return to the substrate. J. N. Am: Benthol. Soc. 8: 322-330.
3. Benke, A. C., K. A. Parson & S. M. Dhar, 1991. Population and community patterns of invertebrate drift in an unregulated Coastal Plain River. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48: 811-823.
4. Brittain, J. E. & T. J. Eikeland, 1988. Invertebrate drift - A review. Hydrobiologia 166: 77-93.
5. Campbell, R. N. B., 1985. Comparison of the drift of live and dead Baetis nymphs in a weakening water current. Hydrobiologia 126: 229-236.
6. Carling, P. A., 1992. The nature of the fluid boundary layer and the selection of parameters for benthic ecology. Freshwat. Biol. 28: 273-284.
7. Cibrowski, J. J. H., 1983. Influence of current velocity, density, and detritus on drift of two mayfly species (Ephemeroptera). Can. J. Zool. 61: 119-125.
8. Cobb, D. G., T. D. Galloway & J. F. Flannagan. 1992. Effects of discharge and substrate stability on density and species composition of stream insects. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 1788-1795.
9. Davis, J. A. & L. A. Barmuta, 1989. An ecologically useful classification of mean and near-bed flows in streams and rivers. Freshwat. Biol. 21: 271-282.
10. Dodds, K. W., 1991. Micro-environmental characteristics of filamentous algal communities in flowing freshwaters. Freshw. Biol. 25: 199-209.
11. Dodds, W. K. & D. A. Gudder, 1992. The ecology of Cladophora. J. Phycol. 28: 415-427.
12. Dudley, T. L., 1992. Beneficial effects of herbivores on stream macroalgae via epiphyte removal. Oikos 65: 121-127.
13. Elliot, J. M., 1967. Invertebrate drift in a Dartmoor stream. Arch. Hydrobiol. 63: 202-237.
14. Elliot, J. M., 1971. The distances travelled by drifting invertebrates in a Lake District stream. Oecologia 6: 350-379.
15. Fairchild, M. P. & J. R. Holomuzki, in press. Spatial variability and assemblage structure of stream hydropyschid caddisflies. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc.
16. Forrester, G. E., 1994. Influences of predatory fish on the drift dispersal and local density of stream insects. Ecology 75: 1208-1218.
17. Fuller, R. L. & R. J. Mackay, 1980. Feeding ecology of three species of Hydropsche (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in southern Ontario. Can. J. Zool. 58: 2239-2251.
18. Fuller, R. L. & P. S. Rand, 1990. Influence of substrate type on vulnerability of prey to predaceous aquatic insects. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 9: 1-8.
19. Gilliam, J. F. & D. F. Fraser, 2001. Movement in corridors: Enhancement by predation threat, disturbance, and habitat structure. Ecology 82: 258-273.
20. Glass, L. W. & R. V. Bovberg, 1969. Density and dispersion in laboratory populations of caddisfly larvae (Cheumatopsyche, Hydropyschidae). Ecology 50: 1082-1084.
21. Gordon, N. D., T. A. McMahon & B. L. Finlayson, 1992. Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England.
22. Haney, J. F., T. R. Beaulieu, R. P. Berry, D. P. Mason, C. R. Miner, E. S. McLean, K. L. Price, M. A. Trout, R. A. Vinton & S. J. Weiss, 1983. Light intensity and relative light change as factors regulating stream drift. Arch. Hydrobiol. 97: 73-88.
23. Hanski, I., 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396: 41-49.
24. Hart, D. D., B. D. Clark & A. Jasentuliyana, 1996. Fine-scale field measurements of benthic flow environments inhabitated by stream invertebrates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41: 297-308.
25. Holomuzki, J. R., 1996. Effects of substrate and predatory type on microdistributions and drift of a lotic mayfly. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 15: 520-528.
26. Holomuzki, J. R. & B. J. F. Biggs, 1999. Distributional responses to flow disturbance by a stream-dwelling snail. Oikos 87: 36-47.
27. Holomuzki, J. R. & B. J. F. Biggs, 2000. Taxon-specific responses to high-flow disturbance in streams: Implications for population persistence. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 19: 670-679.
28. Holomuzki, J. R., R. W. Pillsbury & S. B. Khandwala, 1999. Interplay between dispersal determinants of larval hydropsychid caddisflies. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 2041-2050.
29. Holomuzki, J. R. & T. M. Short, 1988. Habitat use and fish avoidance behaviors by the stream-dwelling isopod Lirceus fontinalis. Oikos 52: 79-86.
30. Kerans, B. L., 1992. Season and body size influence movement of hydropsychid caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 259-265.
31. Kerans, B. L., 1996. The influence of periphyton and rock texture on the diel drift periodicity of a hydropsychid caddisfly. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 11: 163-169.
32. Kline, S. J., W. C. Reynolds, F. A. Schraub & P. W. Rundstadler, 1967. The structure of the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mechanics 30: 741-773.
33. Kohler, S. L., 1985. Identification of stream drift mechanisms: an experimental and observational approach. Ecology 66: 1749-1761.
34. Lancaster, J., A. G. Hildrew & C. Gjerlov, 1996. Invertebrate drift and longitudinal transport processes in streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53: 572-582.
35. Larkin, P. A. & D. W. McKone, 1985. An evaluation by field experiments of the McLay model of stream drift. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42: 909-918.
36. Malas, D. & J. B. Wallace, 1977. Strategies for coexistence in three species of net-spinning caddisflies (Trichoptera) in second-order southern Appalachian streams. Can. J. Zool. 55: 1829-1840.
37. Matthaei, C. D., C. J. Arbuckle & C. R. Townsend, 2000. Stable surface stones as refugia for invertebrates during disturbance in a New Zealand stream. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 19: 82-93.
38. McLay, C., 1970. A theory concerning the distance travelled by animals entering the drift of a stream. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 27: 359-370.
39. Michael, D. I. & D. A. Culver, 1987. Influence of plecopteran and megalopteran predators on Hydropsyche (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) microdistribution and behavior. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 6: 46-55.
40. Neves, R. J., 1979. Movements of larval and adult Pycnopsyche guttifer (Walker) (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) along Factory Brook, Massachusetts. Am. Midl. Nat. 102: 51-58.
41. Osborne, L. L. & E. E. Herricks, 1987. Microhabitat characteristics of Hydropsyche (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) and the importance of body size. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 6: 115-124.
42. Palmer M. A., P. Arsenburger, A. P. Martin & D. W. Denman, 1996. Disturbance and patch-specific responses: The interactive effects of woody debris dams on lotic invertebrates. Oecologia 105: 247-257.
43. Peckarsky, B. L., 1996. Alternative predator avoidance syndromes of stream-dwelling mayfly larvae. Ecology 77: 1888-1905.
44. Rempel, L. L., J. S. Richardson & M. C. Healey, 2000. Macroinvertebrate community structure along gradients of hydraulic and sedimentary conditions in a large gravel-bed stream. Freshw. Biol. 45: 57-73.
45. Schulz, R. & M. Liess, 1999. A field study of the effects of agriculturally derived insecticide input on stream macroinvertebrate dynamics. Aquat. Toxicol. 46: 155-176.
46. Schuster, G. A. & D. A. Etnier, 1978. A manual for the identification of the larvae of the caddisfly genera Hydropsche Pictet and Symphitopsyche Ulmer in eastern and central North America (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Rep. No. 600/4-78-060.
47. rd Edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
48. Statzner, B. & G. Bretschko, 1998. Net-building of a caddis fly (Hydropsyche siltalai) in a French stream: relations with larval density and physical conditions. Arch. Hydrobiol. 144: 87-102.
49. Statzner, B., C. Dejoux & J.-M. Elouard, 1984. Field experiments on the relationship between drift and benthic densities of aquatic insects in tropical streams (Ivory Coast). Rev. Hydrobiol. Trop. 17: 319-334.
50. Strayer, D. L., 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 18: 468-476.
51. Waters, T. F., 1962. Diurnal periodicity in the drift of stream invertebrates. Ecology 43: 316-320.
52. Waters, T. F., 1972. The drift of stream insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 17: 253-272.
53. Way, C. M., A. J. Burky, C. R. Bingham & A. C. Miller, 1995. Substrate roughness, velocity refuges, and macroinvertebrate abundance on artificial substrates in the lower Mississippi River. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 14: 510-518.
54. Wetmore, S. H., R. J. Mackay & R. W. Newbury, 1990. Characterization of the hydraulic habitat of Brachycentrus occidentalis, a filter feeding caddisfly. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 9: 157-169.
55. Wiggins, G. B., 1996. Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera), 2nd Edn. Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario.
56. Williams, D. D., 1990. A field study of the effects of water temperature, discharge and trout odor on the drift of stream invertebrates. Arch. Hydrobiol. 119: 167-181.
57. Williams, D. D. & G. P. Levens 1988. Evidence that hunger and limb loss can contribute to stream invertebrate drift. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 180-187.