Vividness of visual imagery and source memory for audio and text

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 87-95

  Eberman, Carolin ^a   McKelvie, Stuart J ^a  

^a BISHOP'S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; READING; RECOGNITION; RETINA IMAGE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 0347501757     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.755     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ackil JK, Zaragoza MS. 1995. Developmental differences in eyewitness suggestibility and memory for source. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 60: 57-83.
2. Dobson M, Markham R. 1993. Imagery ability and source monitoring: Implications for eyewitness memory. British Journal of Psychology 32: 111-118.
3. Feldt LS. 1961. The use of extreme groups to test for the presence of a relationship. Psychometrika 26: 307-316.
4. Heuer F, Fischman D, Reisberg D. 1986. Why does vivid imagery hurt color memory? Canadian Journal of Psychology 40: 161-175.
5. Johnson MK, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay DS. 1993. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin 114: 3-28.
6. Johnson MK, Kahan T, Raye CL. 1984. Dreams and reality monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 329-343.
7. Johnson MK, Raye CL, Wang AY, Taylor TH. 1979. Fact and fantasy: The roles of accuracy and variability in confusing imagination with perceptual experiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5: 229-240.
8. Jurica PJ, Shimamura AP. 1999. Monitoring item and source information: Evidence for a negative generation effect in memory. Memory and Cognition 27: 648-656.
9. Kahan TL. 1996. Memory source confusions: Effects of character rotation and sensory modality. American Journal of Psychology 109: 431-448.
10. Koriat A, Goldsmith M, Pansky A. 2000. Towards a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology 51: 481-537.
11. Lane SM, Zaragoza MS. 1995. The collective experience of cross-modality confusion errors. Memory and Cognition 23: 607-610.
12. Markham R, Hynes L. 1993. The effect of vividness of visual imagery on reality monitoring. Journal of Mental Imagery 17: 159-170.
13. Lindsay DS, Johnson MK. 1989. The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory and Cognition 17: 349-358.
14. Marks DF. 1973. Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology 64: 17-24.
15. Marks DF. 1989. Bibliography of research utilizing the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills 69: 707-718.
16. Marks DF. 1995. New directions for mental imagery research. Journal of Mental Imagery 19(3 & 4): 153-166.
17. McKelvie SJ. 1995. Vividness of visual imagery: Measurement, nature, function and dynamics. Brandon House: New York.
18. Richardson A. 1994. Individual Differences in Imaging: Their measurement, origins, and consequences. Baywood Publishing Company, Inc.: Amityville, NY.
19. Zaragoza MS, Koshmider JW. 1989. Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 15: 246-255.
20. Zaragoza MS, Lane SM. 1994. Source misattributions and the suggestibilioty of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20: 934-945.
21. Zaragoza MS, Mitchell KJ. 1996. Repeated exposure to suggestion and the creation of false memories. Psychological Science 7: 294-300.