Value-added animal agriculture: Inclusion of race and gender in the professional formula

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 81, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 2895-2903

  Beck, M M ^a,c   Swanson, J C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c A224 Animal Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal Husbandry; Diversity; Universities

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MINORITY GROUP; RESEARCH; SEX RATIO; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMALS; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; DEMOGRAPHY; FACULTY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MINORITY GROUPS; RESEARCH; SEX DISTRIBUTION; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 1542441769     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/2003.81112895x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (57)

1. Adams, C. J. 2002. The Sexual Politics of Meat; a Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. Continuum Publishing Co., New York.
2. AAUP Report. 2000. Does diversity make a difference? A research report. Academe Sept./Oct. 54-57.
3. Barash, D. 1977. Pages 10-25 in Sociobiology and Behavior. Elsevier. New York.
4. Barash, D. 1979. Pages 15-33 in The Whisperings Within. Harper & Row, New York.
5. Benbow, C. and J. Stanley. 1980. Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science (Wash., DC). 210:1262-1264.
6. Benbow, C., and J. Stanley. 1983. Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science 222:1029-1031.
7. Bleier, R. 1984. Pages 15-48 in Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and its Theories on Women. Pergamon Press, New York.
8. Bleier, R. 1986. Lab coat: Robe of innocence or Klansman's sheet? Pages 55-66 in Feminist Studies, Critical Studies. T. de Laurentis, ed. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
9. Bleier, R. 1988. Pages 80-118 in Sex Differences Research: Science or Belief? Feminist Approaches to Science. R. Bleier, ed. Pergamon Press, New York.
10. Chubin, D. E., and S. M. Malcom. 1996. Policies to promote women in science. Pages 1-28 in The Equity Equation. C. S. Davis et al., eds. Jossey and Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
11. Davis, C. S., and S. Rosser. 1996. Program and curricular interventions. Pages 232-264 in The Equity Equation. C. S. Davis, et al, ed. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
12. Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, New York.
13. Chambers D. W. 1983. Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist-test. Sci. Ed. 67(2):255-265.
14. Cleere, J. J., B. A. Minney, B. H. Johnson, P. S. Murano, G. E. Briers, and T. R. Greathouse. 2000. Transfer student and gender issues within the Department of Animal Science at Texas A&M University. J. Anim. Sci. 78:3184-3188.
15. Flannery, M. C. 1999. Dressing in style? An essay on the lab coat. Am. Biol. Teacher 61(5):380-383.
16. Florea, J. H. 1974. Education. Pages 50-102 in American Poultry History. J. A. Hanke, ed. 1823-1973.
17. Frank, F. W., and P. A Treichler. 1989. Language, gender, and professional writing: Theoretical approaches and guidelines for non-sexist usage. Commission on the Status of Women in the Profession. The Modern Language Association of America, New York.
18. Fullerton H. N., and M. T. Toossi. Labor force projections to 2010: steady growth and changing composition. Monthly Labor Rev. 124(11):21-59.
19. Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Georgi, H. 2000. A Tentative Theory of Unconscious Discrimination Against Women in Science. Natl. Acad. Sci. Press, Washington, DC.
21. Geschwind, N., and P. Behan. 1982. Left-handedness: Association with immune disease, migraine, and developmental learning disorder. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 79:5097-5100.
22. Glenn, B. P. 1996. The role of mentors for women in animal science: Perspectives from government. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2855-2859.
23. Harlander, S. K. 1996. Breaking through the glass ceiling: An industrial perspective. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2849-2854.
24. Harris, R. P., and S. Deo. 1991. The reproduction of western agricultural knowledge within the periphery: A comparative study of Indian and African-American agricultural institutions. Rural Sociol. Soc. (Abstr.).
25. Hu-DeHart, E. 2000. The diversity project: Institutionalizing multiculturalism or managing differences? Academe Sept/Oct. 39-42.
26. Hunte, C. N. 1992. The African American experience in agriculture. Agric. Human Values 9(1):11-14.
27. Jones, W. A., and A. Larke, Jr. 2001. Factors influencing career choice of African American and Hispanic graduates of a land grant college of agriculture. J. Agric. Educ. 42(1):38-48.
28. Milem, J. F. 2000. Why race matters. Academe Sept./Oct. 27-29.
29. National Science Foundation. 2000. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. NSF 00-327, Arlington, VA.
30. Pell, A. N. 1996. Fixing the leaky pipeline: Women scientists in academia. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2843-2848.
31. Radke, A. 2002. Women students of the coeducational land-grant universities in the American west, 1868-1917. Ph.D. Diss., Univ of Nebraska, Lincoln.
32. Reid, I. S. 1987. Science, politics and race. Pages 99-124 in Harding, S. and J. F. O'Barr, ed. Sex and Scientific Inquiry. The Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
33. Rochin, R. I. 1997. The features and roles of rural Latinos: Cross-national perspectives. Paper No. 26. Latino Studies Series. Ann. Conf. of the Amer. Agric. Econ. Assoc. and the Rural Sociol. Soc. July. Ontario, Canada.
34. Rogers, E. 1995. Living and learning: Experiences north and south. Thresholds Ed. 22(3-4):2-9.
35. Rose, H. 2002. Nine decades, nine women, ten Nobel prizes. Gender at the apex of science. Pages 53-68 in Women, Science and Technology. A Reader in Feminist Science Studies. M. Wyer et al., ed. Routledge, New York.
36. Ruskal, M. B. 1989. How stereotypes about science affect the participation of women. AAAS 1989 Annnual Meeting. Association for Women in Science. Washington, DC.
37. Sadker, M., and D. Sadker. 1994. Failing at Fairness: How American's Schools Cheat Girls. McMillan, New York.
38. Schiebinger, L. 1987. Pages 7-34 in Sex and Scientific Inquiry. S. Harding and J. F. O'Barr, ed. The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
39. Schillo, K. K. 1998. Toward a pluralistic animal Science: Postliberal feminist perspectives. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2763-2770.
40. Smith, D. G. 2000. How to diversify the faculty. Academe Sept/Oct. 48-52.
41. Snively, G., and J. Consiglia. 1997. Connections '97. Rediscovering traditional Science in multicultural science education, http:// www.educ.uvic.ca/connections/Conn97/13snively.html. Accessed May 6, 2002.
42. Snyder, T. D. 1993. 120 years of American education: A statistical portrait. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Publication 93-442.
43. Sonnert, G. 1996. Gender equity in science: Still an elusive goal. Sci. Technol. 12(2):53-58.
44. Sonnert, G., and G. Holton. 1996. Career paths of women and men in the sciences. Amer. Sci. 84:63-71.
45. Stanley, K. P. 1990. Ethnic diversity in rural labor markets: The case of the Midwestern meatpacking industry. Rural Sociological Society. (Abstr.).
46. Taylor, R. E. 1992. Page 222 in Scientific Farm Animal Production. McMillan Publishing Co., New York.
47. Thomas, V. 1989. Black women engineers and technologists. Sage VI(2):24-32.
48. Thornhill, R., and N. W. Thornhill. 1992. The evolutionary psychology of mens' coercive sexuality. Behav. Brain Sci. 152:363-375.
49. Trower, C. A., and R. P. Chait. 2002. Faculty diversity: Too little for too long. Harvard Magazine, March/April. http://www.harvard-magazine.com/on-ine/ 030218.html. Accessed: June 4, 2002.
50. Turner, C. S. V. 2000. New faces, new knowledge Academe. Sept./ Oct. 34-37.
51. Valian, V. 1999. Pages 1-46 in Why So Slow? MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
52. Van Den Berghe, P. L., and D. P. Barash. 1977. Inclusive fitness and human family structure. Am. Anthropol. 79:809-823.
53. Vetter, B. 1996. Myths and realities of womens' progress in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. Pages 29-56 in The Equity Equation. C. S. Davis et al., ed. Jossey and Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
54. Wayne, M. L. 2000. Walking a tightrope: The feminist life of a Drosophila Biologist. NWSA J. 12 (3):139-150.
55. Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
56. Wilson, E. O. 1979. On Human Nature. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
57. Wilson, L. 1994. Reform, renewal, and resilience: Educating our aspirations and changing our ways. Communicator. March.