Toward a Pluralistic Animal Science: Postliberal Feminist Perspectives

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 76, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 2763-2770

  Schillo, Keith K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Gender relations; Professional ethics; Women

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMINISM; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; RESEARCH; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TEACHER;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; FEMALE; FEMINISM; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MENTORS; PREJUDICE; RESEARCH; WOMEN, WORKING;

EID: 0032201054     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/1998.76112763x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bauer, H. H. 1994. Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana.
2. Berry, W. 1977. Living in the future: The modern agricultural ideal. In: W. Berry (Ed.) The Unsettling of America: Culture and Agriculture, pp 51-80. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, CA.
3. Callahan, J. C. 1994. Professions, institutions, and moral risk. In: D E. Wueste (Ed.) Professional Ethics and Social Responsibility. pp 243-270. Rowan and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ.
4. Callahan, J. C. 1995a. Book review: Women and children in health care: An unequal majority. Ethics (July):951.
5. Callahan, J. C. 1995b. Editor's introduction: Reproduction, ethics, and the law: Feminist perspectives. In: J. C. Callahan (Ed.) Reproduction, Ethics and the Law: Feminist Perspectives, pp 1-18. Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington.
6. Callahan, J. C., and D. E. Roberts. 1996. A feminist social justice approach, to, reproduction-assisting, technologies: A case, study on the limits of liberal theory. Ky Law J. 84:1197-1234.
7. Frazer, E., and N. Lacey. 1993. The Polities of Community: A Feminist Critique Liberal-Communitarian Debate. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON, Canada.
8. Gilligan, C. 1995. Moral orientation and moral development. In: V. Held (Ed.) Justice and Care: Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics, pp 31-46. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
9. Glenn, B. P. 1996. The role of mentors for women in animal science: Perspectives from government. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2855-2859.
10. Harding, S. 1992. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? pp 105-137. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.
11. Harlander, S. K. 1996. Breaking through the glass ceiling: An industrial perspective, J. Anim. Sci. 74:2849-2854.
12. Hubbard, R. 1992. The Politics of Women's Biology. Rutgers Univ. Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
13. Kunkel, H. O., and G. R. Hagevoort. 1994. Construction of science for animal agriculture. J. Anim. Sci. 72:247-253.
14. Longino, H. 1996. Can there be a feminist science? In: A. Garry and M. Pearsall (Ed.) Women, Knowledge and Reality, pp 251-263. Routledge, New York.
15. McKenna, E. P. 1997. When Work Doesn't Work Anymore. pp 63-86. Delacorte Press, New York.
16. Merchant, C. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. Harper Collins Publishers, New York.
17. Merchant, C. 1992. Radical Ecology: The Search for a Better World. Routledge, London.
18. Morgan, E. 1972. The Descent of Woman. Stein and Day, New York.
19. Morris, B. 1995. Executive women confront midlife crisis. Fortune (Sept. 18):60-86. .
20. Pell, A, N. 1996. Fixing the leaky pipeline: Women scientists in academia. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2843-2848.
21. Scheman, N. 1996. Though this be method, yet there is madness in it: Paranoia and liberal epistemology. In: E. Fox Keller and H. E. Longino (Ed.) Feminism and Science. pp 203-219. Oxford University Press, New York.
22. Schillo, K. K. 1997. Teaching animal science: Education or indoctrination? J. Anim. Sci. 75:950-953.
23. Tuana, N. 1997. Revaluing science. Presented at the University of Kentucky on January 31.