Imaging methods in periodontology

Periodontology 2000

Volumn 34, Issue , 2004, Pages 34-48

  Mol, André ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; METHODOLOGY; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PERIODONTAL DISEASES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 1542402171     PISSN: 09066713     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.0906-6713.2003.003423.x     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. Åkesson L, Håkansson J, Rohlin M. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level. J Clin Periodontol 1992: 19: 326-332.
2. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999: 28: 245-248.
3. Benn DK. A computer-assisted method for making linear radiographic measurements using stored regions of interest. J Clin Periodontol 1992: 19: 441-448.
4. Brägger U. Radiographic diagnosis of periodontal disease progression. Curr Opin Periodontol 1996: 3: 59-67.
5. Brägger U, Pasquali L, Rylander H, Carnes D, Kornman KS. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis in periodontal radiography. A methodological study. J Clin Periodontol 1988: 15: 27-37.
6. Byrd V, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Reddy MS, Jeffcoat MK. Semi-automated image registration for digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998: 85: 473-478.
7. Chai-U-Dom O, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA, Webber RL. Comparison of conventional and TACT® (tuned aperture computed tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain. An in vitro study. J Periodont Res 2002: 37: 147-153.
8. Dunn SM, van der Stelt PF, Ponce A, Fenesy K, Shah S. A comparison of two registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993: 22: 77-80.
9. Eickholz P, Hausmann E. Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 2000: 108: 70-73.
10. Ekestubbe A, Thilander A, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H-G. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993: 22: 13-17.
11. Eley B, Cox S. Advances in periodontal diagnosis 1. Traditional clinical methods of diagnosis. Br Dent J 1998: 184: 12-16.
12. Ellwood RP, Davies RM, Worthington HV. Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system. J Periodont Res 1997: 32: 241-248.
13. Ettinger GJ, Gordon GG, Goodson JM, Socransky SS, Williams R. Development of automated registration algorithms for subtraction radiography. J Clin Periodontol 1994: 21: 540-543.
14. Fisher E, van der Stelt PF, Ostuni J, Dunn SM. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995: 24: 5-12.
15. Fourmousis I, Brägger U, Bürgin W, Tonetti M, Lang NP. Digital image processing. I. Evaluation of gray level correction methods in vitro. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994: 5: 37-47.
16. Fryback DG, Thombury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991: 11: 88-94.
17. Fuhrmann RAW, Bücker A, Diedrich PR. Assessment of alveolar bone loss with high resolution computed tomography. J Periodont Res 1995: 30: 258-263.
18. Fuhrmann RA, Wehrbein H, Langen HJ, Diedrich PR. Assessment of the dentate alveolar process with high resolution computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995: 24: 50-54.
19. Groenhuis RAJ, Webber RL, Ruttimann UE. Computerized tomosynthesis of dental tissues. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983: 56: 206-214.
20. Gröndahl H-G, Gröndahl K, Webber RL. A digital subtraction technique for dental radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983: 55: 96-102.
21. Hausmann E. A contemporary perspective on techniques for the clinical assessment of alveolar bone. J Periodontol 1990: 61: 149-156.
22. Hausmann E. Radiographic and digital imaging in periodontal practice. J Periodontol 2000: 71: 497-503.
23. Hausmann E, Allen K. Reproducibility of bone height measurements made on serial radiographs. J Periodontol 1997: 68: 839-841.
24. Hausmann E, Allen K, Christersson L, Genco R. Effect of x-ray beam vertical angulation on radiographic alveolar crest level measurement. J Periodont Res 1989: 24: 8-19.
25. Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW. Automated classification of periodontal disease using bitewing radiographs. J Periodontol 1988: 59: 87-94.
26. Hildebolt CF, Pilgram TK, Yokoyama-Crothers N, Fletcher G, Helbig JL, Bartlett TQ, Gravier M, Vannier MW, Shrout MK. Reliability of linear alveolar bone loss measurements of mandibular posterior teeth from digitized bitewing radiographs. J Clin Periodontol 1998: 25: 850-856.
27. Hirschmann PN, Horner K, Rushton VE. Selection criteria for periodontal radiography. Br Dent J 1994: 176: 324-325.
28. Hollender L. Decision making in radiographic imaging. J Dent Educ 1992: 56: 834-843.
29. Honda K, Larheim TA, Johannessen S, Arai Y, Shinoda K, Westesson P-L. Ortho cubic super-high resolution computed tomography: A new radiographic technique with application to the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001: 91: 239-243.
30. Horton RA, Ludlow JB, Webber RL, Gates W, Nason RH Jr, Reboussin D. Detection of peri-implant bone changes with axial tomosynthesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996: 81: 124-129.
31. Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact CT system to assess 3-D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001: 12: 539-542.
32. Ito K, Yoshinuma N, Goke E, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact computed tomography system for evaluating the outcome of regenerative therapy: A case report. J Periodontol 2001: 72: 696-702.
33. Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS. Advances in measurements of periodontal bone and attachment loss. Monogr Oral Sci 2000: 17: 56-72.
34. Jeffcoat MK, Wang I-C, Reddy MS. Radiographic diagnosis in periodontics. Periodontol 2000 1995: 7: 54-68
35. Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS, Magnusson I, Johnson B, Meredith MP, Cavanaugh PF Jr, Gerlach RW. Efficacy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using radiographs exposed in a multicenter trial. J Periodont Res 1996: 31: 157-160.
36. Lehmann TM, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H-G, Schmitt W, Spitzer K. Observer-independent registration of perspective projection prior to subtraction of in vivo radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998: 27: 140-150.
37. Lehmann T, Gröndahl H-G, Benn D. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000: 29: 323-346.
38. Liang H, Tyndall D, Ludlow JB, Lang LA. Cross-sectional presurgical implant imaging using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999: 28: 232-237.
39. Ludlow JB, Nesbit SP. Teaching radiographic localization in dental schools in the United States and Canada. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995: 79: 393-397.
40. Ludlow J, Davies-Ludlow L, Brooks S. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003: 32: 229-234.
41. Mileman PA, Kievit J. Achieving efficacy in oral radiology - out of the woods and into the decision trees? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992: 21: 115-117.
42. Mol A, Dunn S. The performance of protective standardization for digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003: 96: 373-382.
43. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis AIA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998: 8: 1558-1564.
44. Nair MK, Seyedain A, Agarwal S, Webber RL, Nair UP, Piesco NP, Mooney MP, Grondahl H-G. Tuned aperture computed tomography to evaluate osseous healing. J Dent Res 2001: 80: 1621-1624.
45. Naito T, Hosokawa R, Yokota M. Three-dimensional alveolar bone morphology analyis using computed tomography. J Periodontol 1998: 69: 584-589.
46. Ostuni J, Fisher E, van der Stelt P, Dunn S. Registration of dental radiographs using projective geometry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993: 22: 199-203.
47. Otis L, Colston B Jr, Everett M, Nathel H. Dental optical coherence tomography: a comparison of two in vitro systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000: 29: 85-89.
48. Otis LL, Everett MJ, Sathyam US, Colston BW Jr. Optical coherence tomography: A new imaging technology for dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2000: 131: 511-514.
49. Pepelassi EA, Diamanti-Kipioti A. Selection of the most accurate method of conventional radiography for the assessment of periodontal osseous destruction. J Clin Periodontol 1997: 24: 557-567.
50. Pistorius A, Patrosio C, Willershausen B, Mildenberger P, Rippin G. Periodontal probing in comparison to diagnosis by CT-scan. Int Dent J 2001: 51: 339-347.
51. Potter BJ, Shrout MK, Harrell JC. Reproducibility of beam alignment using different bite-wing radiographic techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995: 79: 532-535.
52. Ramesh A, Ludlow JB, Webber RL, Tyndall DA, Paquette D. Evaluation of tuned-aperture computed tomography in the detection of simulated periodontal defects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002: 93: 341-349.
53. Rawlinson A, Ellwood RP, Davies RM. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles. J Clin Periodontol 1999: 26: 138-142.
54. Reddy MS. The use of periodontal probes and radiographs in clinical trials of diagnostic tests. Ann Periodontol 1997: 2: 113-122.
55. Reddy MS, Jeffcoat MK. Methods of assessing periodontal regeneration. Periodontol 2000 1999: 19: 87-103.
56. Richards AG. The buccal object rule. Dent Radiogr Photogr 1980: 53: 37-56.
57. Rushton V, Horner K. A comparative study of radiographic quality with five periapical techniques in general dental practice. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994: 23: 37-15.
58. Ruttimann UE, Webber RL, Schmidt E. A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography. J Periodont Res 1986: 21: 486-495.
59. Ruttimann UE, Qi X-L, Webber RL. An optimal synthetic aperture for circular tomosynthesis. Med Phys 1989: 16: 398-405.
60. Hausmann E. Radiographic and digital imaging in periodontal practice. J Periodontol 2000: 71: 497-503.
61. Hausmann E, Allen K. Reproducibility of bone height measurements made on serial radiographs. J Periodontol 1997: 68: 839-841.
62. Hausmann E, Allen K, Christersson L, Genco R. Effect of x-ray beam vertical angulation on radiographic alveolar crest level measurement. J Periodont Res 1989: 24: 8-19.
63. Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW. Automated classification of periodontal disease using bitewing radiographs. J Periodontol 1988: 59: 87-94.
64. Hildebolt CF, Pilgram TK, Yokoyama-Crothers N, Fletcher G, Helbig JL, Bartlett TQ, Gravier M, Vannier MW, Shrout MK. Reliability of linear alveolar bone loss measurements of mandibular posterior teeth from digitized bitewing radiographs. J Clin Periodontol 1998: 25: 850-856.
65. Hirschmann PN, Horner K, Rushton VE. Selection criteria for periodontal radiography. Br Dent J 1994: 176: 324-325.
66. Hollender L. Decision making in radiographic imaging. J Dent Educ 1992: 56: 834-843.
67. Honda K, Larheim TA, Johannessen S, Arai Y, Shinoda K, Westesson P-L. Ortho cubic super-high resolution computed tomography: A new radiographic technique with application to the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001: 91: 239-243.
68. Horton RA, Ludlow JB, Webber RL, Gates W, Nason RH Jr, Reboussin D. Detection of peri-implant bone changes with axial tomosynthesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996: 81: 124-129.
69. Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact CT system to assess 3-D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001: 12: 539-542.
70. Ito K, Yoshinuma N, Goke E, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact computed tomography system for evaluating the outcome of regenerative therapy. A case report. J Periodontol 2001: 72: 696-702.
71. Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS. Advances in measurements of periodontal bone and attachment loss. Monogr Oral Sci 2000: 17: 56-72.
72. Jeffcoat MK, Wang I-C, Reddy MS. Radiographic diagnosis in periodontics. Periodontol 2000 1995: 7: 54-68
73. Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS, Magnusson I, Johnson B, Meredith MP, Cavanaugh PF Jr, Gerlach RW. Efficacy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using radiographs exposed in a multicenter trial. J Periodont Res 1996: 31: 157-160.
74. Lehmann TM, Gröndahl K, Grondahl H-G, Schmitt W, Spitzer K. Observer-independent registration of perspective projection prior to subtraction of in vivo radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998: 27: 140-150.
75. Lehmann T, Gröndahl H-G, Benn D. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000: 29: 323-346.
76. Liang H, Tyndall D, Ludlow JB, Lang LA. Cross-sectional presurgical implant imaging using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999: 28: 232-237.
77. Ludlow JB, Nesbit SP. Teaching radiographic localization in dental schools in the United States and Canada. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995: 79: 393-397.
78. Ludlow J, Davies-Ludlow L, Brooks S. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003: 32: 229-234.
79. Mileman PA, Kievit J. Achieving efficacy in oral radiology - out of the woods and into the decision trees? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992: 21: 115-117.
80. Mol A, Dunn S. The performance of projective standardization for digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003: 96: 373-382.
81. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis AIA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998: 8: 1558-1564.
82. Nair MK, Seyedain A, Agarwal S, Webber RL, Nair UP, Piesco NP, Mooney MP, Grondahl H-G. Tuned aperture computed tomography to evaluate osseous healing. J Dent Res 2001: 80: 1621-1624.
83. Naito T, Hosokawa R, Yokota M. Three-dimensional alveolar bone morphology analyis using computed tomography. J Periodontol 1998: 69: 584-589.
84. Ostuni J, Fisher E, van der Stelt P, Dunn S. Registration of dental radiographs using projective geometry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993: 22: 199-203.
85. Otis L, Colston B Jr, Everett M, Nathel H. Dental optical coherence tomography: a comparison of two in vitro systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000: 29: 85-89.
86. Otis LL, Everett MJ, Sathyam US, Colston BW Jr. Optical coherence tomography: A new imaging technology for dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2000: 131: 511-514.
87. Pepelassi EA, Diamanti-Kipioti A. Selection of the most accurate method of conventional radiography for the assessment of periodontal osseous destruction. J Clin Periodontol 1997: 24: 557-567.
88. Pistorius A, Patrosio C, Willershausen B, Mildenberger P, Rippin G. Periodontal probing in comparison to diagnosis by CT-scan. Int Dent J 2001: 51: 339-347.
89. Potter BJ, Shrout MK, Harrell JC. Reproducibility of beam alignment using different bite-wing radiographic techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995: 79: 532-535.
90. Ramesh A, Ludlow JB, Webber RL, Tyndall DA, Paquette D. Evaluation of tuned-aperture computed tomography in the detection of simulated periodontal defects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002: 93: 341-349.
91. Rawlinson A, Ellwood RP, Davies RM. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles. J Clin Periodontol 1999: 26: 138-142.
92. Reddy MS. The use of periodontal probes and radiographs in clinical trials of diagnostic tests. Ann Periodontol 1997: 2: 113-122.
93. Reddy MS, Jeffcoat MK. Methods of assessing periodontal regeneration. Periodontol 2000 1999: 19: 87-103.
94. Richards AG. The buccal object rule. Dent Radiogr Photogr 1980: 53: 37-56.
95. Rushton V, Horner K. A comparative study of radiographic quality with five periapical techniques in general dental practice. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994: 23: 37-45.
96. Ruttimann UE, Webber RL, Schmidt E. A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography. J Periodont Res 1986: 21: 486-495.
97. Ruttimann UE, Qi X-L, Webber RL. An optimal synthetic aperture for circular tomosynthesis. Med Phys 1989: 16: 398-405.
98. Samarabandu J, Allen KM, Hausmann E, Acharya R. Algorithm for the automated alignment of radiographs for image subtraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994: 77: 75-79.
99. Scaf G, Lurie AG, Mosier KM, Kantor ML, Ramsby GR, Freedman ML. Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997: 83: 41-48.
100. Tonetti MS, Pini Prato G, Williams RC, Cortellini P. Periodontal regeneration of human infrabony defects. III. Diagnostic strategies to detect bone gain. J Periodontol 1993: 64: 269-277.
101. Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN. The usefulness of radiographs in diagnosis and management of periodontal diseases: a review. J Dent 2000: 28: 219-226.
102. Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: A position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000: 89: 630-637.
103. Van Daatselaar A, Dunn S, Spoelder H, Germans D, Renambot L, Bal H, Van der Stelt P. Feasibility of local CT of dental tissues. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003: in press.
104. Vandre RH, Webber RL. Future trends in dental radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995: 80: 471-478.
105. Webber RL, Ruttimann UE, Groenhuis RAJ. Computer correction of projective distortions in dental radiographs. J Dent Res 1984: 63: 1032-1036.
106. Webber RL, Horton RA, Underbill TE, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA. Comparison of film, direct digital, and tuned-aperture computed tomography images to identify the location of crestal defects around endosseous titanium implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996: 81: 480-490.
107. Webber RL, Horton RA, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB. Tunedaperture computed tomography (TACT™). Theory and application for three-dimensional dento-alveolar imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997: 26: 53-62.
108. Wenzel A. Effect of manual compared with reference point superimposition on image quality in digital subtraction radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1989: 18: 145-150.
109. White S. 1992 assessment of radiation risk from dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992: 21: 118-126.
110. th edn. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co., 2000.
111. White SC, Heslop EW, Hollender LG, Mosier KM, Ruprecht A, Shrout MK. Parameters of radiologic care: an official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001: 91: 498-511.
112. Wyatt CC, Pharoah MJ. Imaging techniques and image interpretation for dental implant treatment. Int J Prosthodont 1998: 11: 442-552.