The performance of projective standardization for digital subtraction radiography

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 373-382

  Mol, André ^a   Dunn, Stanley M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MANDIBLE; PERFORMANCE; RADIOGRAPHY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

EID: 0042335924     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00357-3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Gröndahl H.G., Gröndahl K., Webber R.L. A digital subtraction technique for dental radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 55:1983;96-102.
2. Reddy M.S., Jeffcoat M.K. Digital subtraction radiography. Dent Clin North Am. 37:1993;553-565.
3. Reddy M.S., Jeffcoat M.K. Methods of assessing periodontal regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 19:1999;87-103.
4. Vandre R.H., Webber R.L. Future trends in dental radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 80:1995;471-478.
5. Mol A. Image processing tools for dental applications. Dent Clin North Am. 44:2000;299-318.
6. Janssen P.T., van Palenstein Helderman W., van Aken J. The effect of in-vivo-occurring errors in the reproducibility of radiographs on the use of the subtraction technique. J Clin Periodontol. 16:1989;53-58.
7. Janssen P.T., van Aken J. Problems around the in vitro and in vivo application of quantitative digital subtraction radiography. J Clin Periodontol. 16:1989;323-330.
8. Rudolph D.J., White S.C., Mankovich N.J. Influence of geometric distortion and exposure parameters on sensitivity of digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 64:1987;631-637.
9. Lehmann T.M., Gröndahl H.G., Benn D.K. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 29:2000;323-346.
10. Byrd V., Mayfield-Donahoo T., Reddy M.S., Jeffcoat M.K. Semiautomated image registration for digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 85:1998;473-478.
11. Ellwood R.P., Davies R.M., Worthington H.V. Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system. J Periodontal Res. 32:1997;241-248.
12. Ettinger G.J., Gordon G.G., Goodson J.M., Socransky S.S., Williams R. Development of automated registration algorithms for subtraction radiography. J Clin Periodontol. 21:1994;540-543.
13. Samarabandu J., Allen K.M., Hausmann E., Acharya R. Algorithm for the automated alignment of radiographs for image subtraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 77:1994;75-79.
14. Webber R.L., Ruttimann U.E., Groenhuis R.A. Computer correction of projective distortions in dental radiographs. J Dent Res. 63:1984;1032-1036.
15. Dunn S.M., van der Stelt P.F., Ponce A., Fenesy K., Shah S. A comparison of two registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 22:1993;77-80.
16. Fisher E., van der Stelt P.F., Ostuni J., Dunn S.M. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 24:1995;5-12.
17. Lehmann T.M., Gröndahl K., Gröndahl H.G., Schmitt W., Spitzer K. Observer-independent registration of perspective projection prior to subtraction of in vivo radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 27:1998;140-150.
18. Ostuni J., Fisher E., van der Stelt P., Dunn S. Registration of dental radiographs using projective geometry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 22:1993;199-203.
19. Wenzel A. Effect of manual compared with reference point superimposition on image quality in digital subtraction radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 18:1989;145-150.
20. Dunn S.M., van der Stelt P.F. Recognizing invariant geometric structure in dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 21:1992;142-147.
21. Yoon D.C. A new method for the automated alignment of dental radiographs for digital subtraction radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 29:2000;11-19.
22. van der Stelt P.F., Ruttimann U.E., Webber R.L. Determination of projections for subtraction radiography based on image similarity measurements. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 18:1989;113-117.
23. Dunn S. Digital standardization of dental radiographs [thesis]. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit; 1993.
24. Samarabandu J., Allen K., Hausmann E., Acharya R. Registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 23:1994;117-119.
25. Mol A., Chanthavilay D., Giannakopoulos K. The effect of object motion on the performance of projective standardization. Farman A., Ruprecht A., Gibbs S., Scarfe W. Advances in maxillofacial imaging. 1997;315-322 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
26. Benn D.K. Limitations of the digital image subtraction technique in assessing alveolar bone crest changes due to misalignment errors during image capture. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 19:1990;97-104.
27. Loftin R., Webber R., Horton R., Tyndall D., Moriarty J. Effect of projective aspects variations on estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res. 33:1998;352-358.