The effects of management and environmental variation on population stage structure in three river-corridor violets

Acta Oecologica

Volumn 25, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 83-91

  Eckstein, R Lutz ^a   Danihelka, Jiří ^b   Hölzel, Norbert ^a   Otte, Annette ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Bryophyte cover; Conservation; Fragmentation; Litter; Management; Population viability; Viola

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; FLOODPLAIN; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; HABITAT QUALITY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; RIPARIAN ZONE;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; RHINE VALLEY; THAYA VALLEY;

BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; EMBRYOPHYTA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; VIOLA ELATIOR; VIOLACEAE;

EID: 1542379672     PISSN: 1146609X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2003.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bühler C., Schmid B. The influence of management regime and altitude on the population stage structure of Succisa pratensis: implications for vegetation monitoring. J. Appl. Ecol. 38:2001;689-698.
2. Burkart M. River corridor plants (Stromtalpflanzen) in Central European lowlands: a review of a poorly understood plant distribution pattern. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 10:2001;449-468.
3. Caswell H. Matrix Population Models - Construction. 2001;Analysis and Interpretation, Sinauer, Sunderland.
4. Didier B., Royer J.-M. Études phytosociologiques des prairies de fauche inondables des vallés de l'Aube, de la Seine et de la Marne (Champagne crayeuse). Colloques Phytosociologiques. 16:1988;195-209.
5. Dietz H., Fischer M., Schmid B. Demographic and genetic invasion history of a 9-year-old roadside population of Bunias orientalis L. (Brassicaceae). Oecologia. 120:1999;225-234.
6. Dixon P.M. The bootstrap and the jackknife: describing the precision of ecological indices. Scheiner S.M., Gurevitch J. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. 1993;290-318 Chapman & Hall, New York.
7. During H.J., van Tooren B.F. Bryophyte interactions with other plants. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 140:1990;79-98.
8. Ekstam U., Forshed N. Om hävden upphör. Kärlväxter som indikatorarter in ängs- och hagmarker. 1997;Naturvårdsverket, Solna, Sweden.
9. Facelli J.M., Pickett S.T.A. Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot. Rev. 57:1991;1-32.
10. Grubb J.P. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol. Rev. 52:1977;107-145.
11. Grubb J.P. Problems posed by sparse and patchily distributed species in species-rich plant communities. Diamond J., Case T.J. Community Ecology. 1986;207-225 Harper & Row, New York.
12. Grulich V., Antonín V., Hradílek Z., Š umberová K., Vicherek J., Danihelka J. Summary. Vicherek J., Antonín V., Danihelka J., Grulich V., Gruna B., Hradílek Z., Řehořek V., Šumberová K., Vampola P., Vágner A. Flóra a vegetace na soutoku Moravy a Dyje (Flora and Vegetation at the Confluence of the Morava and Dyje Rivers). 2000;307-327 Masarykova univerzita v Brně, Brno.
13. Hegi G. Violaceae. second ed Hegi G. Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. vol. 5/1:1975;586-668 Paul Parey, Berlin, Hamburg.
14. Hegland S.J., Van Leeuwen M., Oostermeijer J.G.B. Population stage structure of Salvia pratensis in relation to vegetation and management of Dutch dry floodplain grassland. J. Appl. Ecol. 38:2001;1277-1289.
15. Hölzel N. Flora und Vegetation der Auenwiesen im NSG "Lampertheimer Altrhein" - eine aktuelle Zustandsanalyse mit Hinweisen zur zukünftigen Pflege und Entwicklung. Jahrbuch Naturschutz in Hessen. 4:1999;24-42.
16. Hölzel N. Re-assessing the ecology of rare flood-meadow violets (Viola elatior, V. pumila and V. persicifolia) with large phytosociological data sets. Folia Geobot. 38:2003;281-298.
17. Hölzel N., Otte A. The impact of flooding regime on the soil seed bank of flood-meadows. J. Veg. Sci. 12:2001;209-218.
18. Horvitz C.C., Schemske D.W. Spatiotemporal variation in demographic transitions of a tropical understory herb: projection matrix analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 65:1995;155-192.
19. Hultén E., Fries M. Atlas of North European Vascular Plants (North of the Tropic of Cancer). 1986;Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany.
20. Jensen K., Meyer C. Effects of light competition and litter on the performance of Viola palustris and on species composition and diversity of an abandoned fen meadow. Plant Ecol. 155:2001;169-181.
21. Kirschner J., Skalický V. Violaceae Batsch - violkovité Hejný S., Slavík B. Květena České republiky (Flora of the Czech Republic). vol. 2:1990;394-431 Academia, Praha.
22. Kotorová I., Lepš J. Comparative ecology of seedling recruitment in an oligotrophic wet meadow. J. Veg. Sci. 10:1999;175-186.
23. Lennartsson T., Oostermeijer J.G.B. Demographic variation and population viability in Gentianella campestris: effects of grassland management and environmental stochasticity. J. Ecol. 89:2001;451-463.
24. Linusson A.-C., Berlin G.A.I., Olsson E.G.A. Reduced community diversity in semi-natural meadows in southern Sweden, 1965-1990. Plant Ecol. 136:1998;77-94.
25. Manly B.F.J. Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. 1991;Chapman and Hall, London.
26. Moora M., Sõber V., Zobel M. Responses of a rare (Viola elatior) and a common (V. mirabilis) congeneric species to different management condition in grassland - is different light competition ability responsible for different abundances? Acta Oecol. 24:2003;169-174.
27. Moore P.D. Seeds of thought for plant conservationists. Nature. 303:1983;572.
28. Morgan J.W. The effect of grassland gap size on establishment, growth and flowering of the endangered Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides (Asteraceae). J. Appl. Ecol. 34:1997;566-576.
29. Nash Suding K., Goldberg D.E. Variation in the effect of vegetation and litter on recruitment across productivity gradients. J. Ecol. 87:1999;436-449.
30. Oostermeijer J.G.B., van't Veer R., den Nijs J.C.M. Population stage structure of the rare, long-lived perennial Gentiana pneumonanthe in relation to vegetation and management in the Netherlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 31:1994;428-438.
31. Prax A., Hadaš P., Hybler V. Monitoring vybraných parametrů ovlivňujících bilanci vody lužního lesa (Some parameters influencing water household in a floodplain forest). Kravkam M. Současné problémy lesnické hydrologie (Current Problems in Forest Hydrology). 1997;55-59 Mendelova zemědělská a lesnická univerzita v Brně, Brno.
32. Pullin A.S., Woodell S.R.J. Response of the fen violet, Viola persicifolia Schreber, to different management regimes at Woodwalton Fen National Nature Reserve, Cambridgeshire, England. Biol. Cons. 41:1987;203-217.
33. Quinger B. Violaceae. second ed Sebald O., Seybold S., Philippi G. Die Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Baden-Württembergs. vol. 2:1993;67-103 Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart.
34. Quinn G.P., Keough M.J. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. 2002;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. Rabotnov T.A. Dynamics of plant coenotic populations. White J. The population stage structure of vegetation. Handbook of Vegetation Science. vol. 3:1985;121-142 Junk, Dortrecht.
36. Riba M., Pico F.X., Mayol M. Effects of regional climate and small-scale habitat quality on performance in the relict species Ramonda myconi. J. Veg. Sci. 13:2002;259-268.
37. Rothmaler W. eight ed Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. vol. 4:1994;Kritischer Band, Fischer, Jena, Germany.
38. Rowell T.A. The fen violet at Wicken Fen. Nature Cambridshire. 26:1983;62-65.
39. Rusch G., Fernández-Palacios J.M. The influence of spatial heterogeneity on regeneration by seed in a limestone grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 6:1995;417-426.
40. Ryser P. Influences of neighbouring plants on seedling establishment in limestone grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 4:1993;195-202.
41. Schmidt K., Jensen K. Genetic structure and AFLP variation of remnant populations in the rare plant Pedicularis palustris (Scrophulariaceae) and its relation to population size and reproductive components. Am. J. Bot. 87:2000;678-689.
42. Schnittler M., Günther K.-F. Central European vascular plants requiring priority conservation measures - an analysis from national Red Lists and distribution maps. Biodivers. Conserv. 8:1999;891-925.
43. Schopp-Guth A. Diasporenpotential intensiv genutzter Niedermoorbö den Nordostdeutschlands. Chancen für die Renaturierung? Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz. 6:1997;97-109.
44. Siegel S., Castellan N.J. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. second ed:1988;McGraw-Hill, New York.
45. Silvertown J., Franco M., Pisanty I., Mendoza A. Comparative plant demography - relative importance of life-cycle components to the finite rate of increase in woody and herbaceous perennials. J. Ecol. 81:1993;465-476.
46. Sohlberg E.H., Bliss L.C. Responses of Ranunculus sabinei and Papaver radicatum to removal of the moss layer in two high arctic plant communities. Can. J. Bot. 62:1987;2033-2042.
47. Špačková I., Kotorová I., Lepš J. Sensitivity of seedling recruitment to moss, litter and dominant removal in an oligotrophic wet meadow. Folia Geobot. 33:1998;17-30.
48. Svensson B.M., Carlsson B.Å., Karlsson P.S., Nordell K.O. Comparative long-term demography of three species of Pinguicula. J. Ecol. 81:1993;635-645.
49. Tilman D., May R.M., Lehman C.L., Nowak M.A. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature. 371:1994;65-66.
50. van Tooren B.F. Effects of a bryophyte layer on the emergence of seedlings in a chalk grassland. Acta Oecol. 11:1990;155-163.
51. von Ende C. N. Repeated-measures analysis: growth and other time-dependent measures. Scheiner S.M., Gurevitch J. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. 1993;113-137 Chapman & Hall, New York.
52. Xiong S., Nilsson C. The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta-analysis. J. Ecol. 87:1999;984-994.
53. Zamfir M. Effects of bryophytes and lichens on seedling emergence of alvar plants: evidence from greenhouse experiments. Oikos. 88:2000;603-611.