Sensitivity of seedling recruitment to moss, litter and dominant removal in an oligotrophic wet meadow

Folia Geobotanica

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 17-30

  Špačková, Iva ^a   Kotorová, Ivana ^a   Lepš, Jan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF ENTOMOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Analysis of deviance; Competition; Manipulative experiment; Redundancy analysis; Regeneration niche

Indexed keywords

BRYOPHYTA; CANIDAE; MOLINION; NARDUS STRICTA; SELINUM CARVIFOLIA;

INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; LITTER; MEADOW; MOSS; MOWING; REGENERATION; SEEDLING RECRUITMENT;

EID: 0031812166     PISSN: 12119520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02914928     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BAKKER J.P. (1989): Nature management by grazing and cutting. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht.
2. ĆSAPODY V. (1968): Keimlingsbestimmungsbuch der Dikotyledonen. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
3. DURING H.J. & VAN TOOREN B.F. (1990): Bryophyte interactions with other plants. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 104: 79-98.
4. FACELLI J.M. & FACELLI E. (1993): Interactions after death: plant litter controls priority effect in a successional plant community. Oecologia 95: 277-282.
5. GOLDBERG D. (1995): Generating and testing predictions about community structure: which theory is relevant and can it be tested with observational data? Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 30: 511-519.
6. GRIME J.P. (1979): Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
7. GRIME J.P., HODGSON J.G. & HUNT R. (1988). Comparative plant ecology. Unwin Hyman, London.
8. GRUBB P.J. (1977): The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol. Rev. 52: 107-145.
9. HILLIER S.H. (1990): Gaps, seed banks and plant species diversity in calcareous grassland. In: HILLIER S.H., WALTON D.W.H. & WELLS D.A. (eds.), Calcareous grasslands - Ecology and management, Bluntingsham Books, Bluntingsham, Huntingdon, pp. 57-66.
10. JONGMAN R.H., TER BRAAK C.J.F. & VAN TONGEREN O.F.R. (1987): Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen.
11. KEIZER P.J., VAN TOOREN B.F. & DURING H.J. (1985): Effects of bryophytes on seedling emergence and establishment of short lived forbs in chalk grassland. J. Ecol. 73: 493-504.
12. KLIMEŠ L. (1995): Small-scale distribution of species richness in a grassland (Bílé Karpaty Mts., Czech Republic). Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 30: 499-510.
13. KRAHULEC F. (1995.): Species coexistence in temperate grasslands. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 30: 113-117.
14. KŘENOVÁ Z. & LEPŠ J. (1996): Regeneration of a Gentiana pneumonanthe population in an oligotrophic wet meadow. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 107-112.
15. KULL K. & ZOBEL M. (1991): High species richness in an Estonian wooded meadow. J. Veg. Sci. 2: 711-714.
16. LAVOREL S. & CHESSON P. (1995): How species with different regeneration niches coexist in patchy habitats with local disturbances. Oikos 74: 103-114.
17. LHOTSKÁ M. & KROPÁČ Z. (1985): Atlas semen, plodů a klíčních rostlin (Atlas of seeds, fruits and seedlings). SPN, Praha.
18. MALMER N., SVENSSON B. & WALLÉN B. (1994): Interaction between Sphagnum mosses and field layer vascular plants in the development of peat-forming systems. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 29: 483-496.
19. MCCULLAGH P. & NELDER J.A. (1989): Generalized linear models. Ed. 2. Chapman and Hall, London.
20. PERTTULA U. (1941): Untersuchungen über die generative und vegetative Vermehrung der Blütenpflanzen in den Wald-, Hainwiesen- und Hainfelsen-Vegetation. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A. 58: 1-388.
21. RABOTNOV T.A. (1987): Eksperimental'naya fitotsenologiya (Experimental phytocoenology). Publ. House of Moscow University, Moscow.
22. REJMÁNEK M. & LEPŠ J. (1996): Interspecific associations can reveal competition: Cirsium vulgare and Arctostaphylos patula in a clearcut succession. Oikos 76: 161-168.
23. ROTHMALER W. (1976): Exkursionsflora für die Gebiete der DDR und der BRD. Kritischer Band. Volk und Wissen, Berlin.
24. RUSCH G. & FERNÁNDEZ-PALACIOS J.M. (1995): The influence of spatial heterogeneity on regeneration by seed in a limestone grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 417-427.
25. RYSER P. (1990): Influence of gaps and neighbouring plants on seedling establishment in limestone grassland. Experimental field studies in northern Switzerland. Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH Stiftung Rubel Zürich 104: 1-71.
26. STATISTICAL SCIENCES (1995): S-Plus Guide to statistical and mathematical analysis, version 3.3. StatSci, Seatle.
27. SVENSSON B.M. (1995): Competition between Sphagnum fuscum and Drosera rotundifolia: a case of ecosystem engineering. Oikos 74: 205-212.
28. SYROVÝ S. (1958): Atlas podnebí Československé republiky (Atlas of the climate of Czechoslovak Republic). Ústřední Geodet. Kartogr. Ústav, Praha.
29. ŠMILAUER P. (1992): CANODRAW users guide v. 3.0. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca.
30. TER BRAAK C.J.F. (1990): CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for CANOnical Comunity Ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] corespondence analysis and redundancy analysis, version 3.10. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY.
31. TILMAN D. (1993): Species richness of experimental productivity gradients: how important is colonization limitation? Ecology 74: 2179-2191.
32. VAN DER MAAREL E. & SYKES M.T. (1993): Small scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. J. Veg. Sci. 4:179-188.
33. VAN TOOREN B.F. (1988): The fate of seeds after dispersal in chalk grassland: the role of the bryophyte layer. Oikos 53: 41-48.
34. VAN TOOREN B.F. (1990): Effect of bryophyte layer on the emergence of seedlings of chalk grassland species. Acta Oecol. 11: 155-163.
35. WILSON J.B. (1995): Testing for community structure: a Bayesian approach. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 30: 461-469.
36. WILSON S.D. & TILMAN D. (1993): Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilization. Ecology 74: 599-611.
37. ZITTOVÁ J., VÁŇA J. & HERBEN T. (1982): Mechorosty/Bryophytes. In: NEUHÄUSLOVÁ Z. & KOLBEK J. (eds.), Seznam vyšších rostlin, mechorostů a lišejníků střední Evropy, užitých v bance geobotanických dat BÚ ČSAV (List of names of higher plants used in a database of geobotanical data of Institute of Botany, ČSAV), BÚ ČSAV, Průhonice, pp. 134-178.