Visual evoked potentials elicited by coherently moving dots in dyslexic children

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 357, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 207-210

  Schulte Körne, Gerd ^a   Bartling, Jürgen ^a   Deimel, Wolfgang ^a   Remschmidt, Helmut ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coherent motion; Dyslexia; Magnocellular function; Visual evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CHILD; CINERADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSLEXIA; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNOCELLULAR NUCLEUS; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ADOLESCENT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; DYSLEXIA; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 1542315517     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.12.098     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Amitay S., Ben-Yehudah G., Banai K., Ahissar M. Disabled readers suffer from visual and auditory impairments but not from a specific magnocellular deficit. Brain. 125:2002;2272-2285.
2. Bogacz J., Mendilaharsu C., de Mendilaharsu S.A. Electro-oculographic abnormalities during pursuit movements in developmental dyslexia. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 36:1974;651-656.
3. Braddick O.J., O'Brien J.M., Wattam-Bell J., Atkinson J., Hartley T., Turner R. Brain areas sensitive to coherent visual motion. Perception. 30:2001;61-72.
4. Britten K.H., Newsome W.T., Saunders R.C. Effects of inferotemporal cortex lesions on form-from-motion discrimination in monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 88:1992;292-302.
5. Bundo M., Kaneoke Y., Inao S., Yoshida J., Nakamura A., Kakigi R. Human visual motion areas determined individually by magnetoencephalography and 3D magnetic resonance imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 11:2000;33-45.
6. Cornelissen P., Richardson A., Mason A., Fowler S., Stein J. Contrast sensitivity and coherent motion detection measured at photopic luminance levels in dyslexics and controls. Vis. Res. 35:1995;1483-1494.
7. Cornelissen P.L., Hansen P.C., Gilchrist I., Cormack F., Essex J., Frankish C. Coherent motion detection and letter position encoding. Vis. Res. 38:1998;2181-2191.
8. Dilling H., Mombour W., Schmidt M.H. International Classification of Mental Diseases, ICD-10. German Edition :1991;Huber, Bern.
9. Eals M. Asymmetric processing in perception of apparent movement. Neuropsychologia. 25:1987;429-434.
10. Hayduk S., Bruck M., Cavanagh P. Low-level visual processing skills of adults and children with dyslexia. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 13:1996;975-1015.
11. Merigan W.H., Maunsell J.H.R. How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 16:1993;369-402.
12. Niedeggen M., Wist E.R. Characteristics of visual evoked potentials generated by motion coherence onset. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 8:1999;95-105.
13. Patzwahl D.R., Zanker J.M. Mechanisms of human motion perception: combining evidence from evoked potentials, behavioural performance and computational modelling. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12:2000;273-282.
14. Ramus F., Rosen S., Dakin S.C., Day B.L., Castellote J.M., White S., Frith U. Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain. 126:2003;841-865.
15. Rodman H.R., Albright T.D. Single-unit analysis of pattern-motion selective properties in the middle temporal visual area (MT). Exp. Brain Res. 75:1989;53-64.
16. Schulte-Körne G. Annotation: genetics of reading and spelling disorder. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 42:2001;985-997.
17. Schulte-Körne G., Deimel W., Remschmidt H. Diagnosis of reading and spelling disorder. Z. Kinder Jugendpsychiatr. Psychother. 29:2001;113-116.
18. Skottun B.C. The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: the evidence from contrast sensitivity. Vis. Res. 40:2000;111-127.
19. Stein J., Walsh V. To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends Neurosci. 20:1997;147-152.
20. Talcott J.B., Witton C., McLean M.F., Hansen P.C., Rees A., Green G.G., Stein J.F. Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;2952-2957.