Is fairness used instrumentally? Evidence from sequential bargaining

Journal of Economic Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 467-489

  Carpenter, Jeffrey P ^a  

^a MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bargaining; Experiment; Fairness; Norm; Value orientation

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844354423     PISSN: 01674870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00194-0     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Binmore K. Shaked A. Sutton J. Testing noncooperative bargaining theory: A preliminary study American Economic Review 75 1985 1178-1180
2. Bolton G. The rationality of splitting equally Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 32 1997 365-381
3. Camerer C. Thaler R. Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 1995 209-219
4. Carpenter, J. (2002). Bargaining outcomes as the result of coordinated expectations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, forthcoming
5. Carpenter, J., & Matthews, P. (2001). No switchbacks: Rethinking aspiration-based dynamics in the miniature ultimatum game, mimeo
6. Castillo, M., & Carter, M. (2002). The economic impacts of altruism, trust and reciprocity: An experimental approach to social capital. Mimeo
7. Charness G. Bargaining efficiency and screening: An experimental investigation Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 42 3 2000 285-304
8. Cox J. Trust, reciprocity, and other-regarding preferences: Groups vs. individuals and males vs. females In Zwick R. Rapoport A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental business research 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston
9. Dawes R. Orbell J. The benefits of optimal play in anonymous one-shot prisoner's dilemma games In Arrow K. Mnookin R. Ross L. Tversky A. Wilson R. (Eds.), Barriers to conflict resolution 1995 63-85 Norton New York
10. Forsythe R. Horowitz J. Savin N. Sefton M. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments Games and Economic Behavior 6 1994 347-369
11. Gale J. Binmore K. Samuleson L. Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game Games and Economic Behavior 8 1995 56-90
12. Griesinger D. Livingston J. Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental games Behavioral Science 18 1973 173-188
13. Gueth W. Huck S. From ultimatum bargaining to dictatorship: An experimental study of four games varying in veto power Metroeconometrica 48 1997 262-279
14. Gueth W. Tietz R. Ultimatum bargaining for a shrinking cake: An experimental analysis In Tietz R. Albers W. Selten R. (Eds.), Bounded rational behavior in experimental games and markets 1988 Springer Berlin
15. Gueth W. Tietz R. Ultimatum bargaining behavior: A survey and comparison of experimental results Journal of Economic Psychology 11 1990 417-449
16. Harrison G. McCabe K. Testing noncooperative bargaining theory in experiments Research in experimental economics 1992 137-169 JAI Press Inc Greenwich, CT
17. Hoffman E. McCabe K. Shachat J. Smith V. Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games Games and Economic Behavior 7 1994 346-380
18. Hoffman E. McCabe K. Smith V. On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games International Journal of Game Theory 25 1996 289-301
19. Hoffman E. Spitzer M. The coase theorem: Some experimental tests Journal of Law and Economics 25 1982 73-98
20. Kelley H. Stahelski A. Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16 1 1970 66-91
21. Kravitz D. Gunto S. Decisions and perceptions of recipients in ultimatum bargaining games Journal of Socio-Economics 21 1992 65-84
22. Liebrand W. The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behavior in an N-person multi-stage mixed-motive game European Journal of Social Psychology 14 1984 239-264
23. Mandeville B. The fable of the bees: or, private vices, publick benefits 1714 J. Roberts London
24. McClintock C. Liebrand W. Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 1988 396-409
25. Morrison W. Instincts as relex choice: Does loss of temper have strategic value? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 31 3 1996 335-356
26. Neelin J. Sonnenschein H. Spiegel M. A further test of noncooperative bargaining theory American Economisc Review 78 1988 824-836
27. Ochs J. Roth A. An experimental study of sequential bargaining American Economic Review 79 1989 355-384
28. Offerman T. Sonnemans J. Schram A. Value orientations, expectations and voluntary contributions in public goods The Economic Journal 106 1996 817-845
29. Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics American Economic Review 83 1993 1281-1302
30. Roth A. Bargaining experiments In Kagel J. Roth A. (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics 1995 253-348 Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
31. Skyrms B. Sex and justice The Journal of Philosophy 91 1994 305-320
32. Spiegel, M., Currie, J., Sonnenschein, H., & Sen, A. (1990). Fairness and strategic behavior in two-person, alternating-offer games: Results from bargaining experiments. Mimeo
33. Taylor P. Jonker L. Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics Mathematical Biosciences 40 1978 145-156
34. Young H.P. An evolutionary model of bargaining Journal of Economic Theory 59 1993 145-168