Floral ontogeny and allometry of Mimulus cardinalis: Interpopulational variation and traits of the hummingbird-pollination syndrome

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 166, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 61-83

  Hazle, Thomas ^a,b   Canne Hilliker, Judith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Allometry; Flower; Hummingbird; Mimulus; Ontogeny; Pollination

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; BIRD; FLORAL TRAIT; INTERPOPULATION VARIATION; ONTOGENY; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION;

CALYX; CARDINALIS; COROLLA; MIMULUS CARDINALIS; TROCHILIDAE;

EID: 14844297356     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/425674     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Beardsley PM, RG Olmstead 2002 Redefining Phrymaceae: the placement of Mimulus, tribe Mimuleae, and Phryma. Am J Bot 89:1093-1102.
2. Beardsley PM, A Yen, RG Olmstead 2003 AFLP phylogeny of Mimulus section Erythranthe and the evolution of hummingbird pollination. Evolution 57:1397-1410.
3. Bradshaw HD Jr, KG Otto, BE Frewen, JK McKay, DW Schemske 1998 Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). Genetics 149:367-382.
4. Bradshaw HD Jr, DW Schemske 2003 Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 426:176-178.
5. Bradshaw HD Jr, SM Wilbert, KG Otto, DW Schemske 1995 Genetic mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Nature 376:762-765.
6. Brown JH, A Kodric-Brown 1979 Convergence, competition, and mimicry in a temperate community of hummingbird-pollinated flowers. Ecology 60:1022-1035.
7. Campbell DR, NM Waser, MV Price 1996 Mechanisms of hummingbird-mediated selection for flower width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 77:1463-1472.
8. Canne-Hilliker JM 1988 Agalinis in Peru and Bolivia. Brittonia 40: 433-440.
9. Caruso CM, SB Peterson, CE Ridley 2003 Natural selection on floral traits of Lobelia (Lobeliaceae): spatial and temporal variation. Am J Bot 90:1333-1340.
10. Castellanos MC, P Wilson, JD Thomson 2003 Pollen transfer by hummingbirds and bumblebees, and the divergence of pollination modes in Penstemon. Evolution 57:2742-2752.
11. Coyne JA 1995 Speciation in monkeyflowers. Nature 376:726-727.
12. Endress PK 1994 Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 511 pp.
13. Fetscher AE 2001 Resolution of male-female conflict in an hermaphroditic flower. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:525-529.
14. Fetscher AE, JR Kohn 1999 Stigma behavior in Mimulus aurantiacus (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 86:1130-1135.
15. Fetscher AE, SM Rupert, JR Kohn 2002 Hummingbird foraging position is altered by the touch-sensitive stigma of bush monkey-flower. Oecologia 133:551-558.
16. Galen C 1999 Why do flowers vary? BioScience 49:631-640.
17. Galen C, J Cuba 2001 Down the tube: pollinators, predators, and the evolution of flower shape in the alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 55:1963-1971.
18. Gass CL, WM Roberts 1992 The problem of temporal scale in optimization: three contrasting views of hummingbird visits to flowers. Am Nat 140:829-853.
19. Grant K, V Grant 1968 Hummingbirds and their flowers. Columbia University Press, New York. 115 pp.
20. Guerrant EO Jr 1982 Neotenic evolution of Delphinium nudicale (Ranunculaceae): a hummingbird-pollinated larkspur. Evolution 36: 699-712.
21. Hazle T 2001 Ontogenetic evolution and speciation in Mimulus cardinalis and M. lewisii (Lamiales). MS thesis. University of Guelph.
22. Hiesey WM, MA Nobs, O Björkman 1971 Experimental studies on the nature of species. V. Biosystematics, genetics, and physiological ecology of the Erythranthe section of Mimulus. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC. 213 pp.
23. Hufford L 2001 Ontogenetic sequences: homology, evolution, and the pattering of clade diversity. Pages 27-57 in ML Zelditch, ed. Beyond heterochrony: the evolution of development. Wiley, New York.
24. Johnsgard PA 1997 The hummingbirds of North America. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. 278 pp.
25. Karron JD, RT Jackson, NN Thumser, SL Schlicht 1997 Outcrossing rates of individual Mimulus ringens genets are correlated with anther-stigma separation. Heredity 79:365-370.
26. Lange RS, SA Scobell, PE Scott 2000 Hummingbird-syndrome traits, breeding system, and pollinator effectiveness in two syntopic Penstemon species. Int J Plant Sci 161:253-263.
27. McKinney ML 1988 Classifying heterochrony: allometry, size and time. Pages 17-34 in ML McKinney, ed. Heterochrony in evolution: a multidisciplinary approach. Plenum, New York.
28. Mitchell RJ, NM Waser 1992 Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: pollination success of single flowers. Ecology 73:633-638.
29. Murcia C, P Feinsinger 1996 Interspecific pollen loss by hummingbirds visiting flower mixtures: effects of floral architecture. Ecology 72:550-560.
30. Neal PR, A Dafni, M Giurfa 1998 Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems: terminology, distribution, and hypotheses. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:345-373.
31. Porter MM, LA Johnson 2000 A phylogenetic classification of Polemoniaceae. Aliso 19:55-91.
32. Proctor M, P Yeo, A Lack 1996 The natural history of pollination. Timber, Portland, OR. 479 pp.
33. Ramsey J, HD Bradshaw Jr, DW Schemske 2003 Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57:1520-1534.
34. Ritland C, K Ritland 1989 Variation of sex allocation among eight taxa of the Mimulus guttatus species complex (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 76:1731-1739.
35. Schemske DW, HD Bradshaw Jr 1999 Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:11910-11915.
36. Smith CE, JT Stevens, EJ Temeles, PW Ewald, RJ Hebert, RJ Bonkovsky 1996 Effect of floral orifice width and shape on hummingbird-flower interactions. Oecologia 106:482-492.
37. Sutherland S, RK Vickery Jr 1988 Trade-offs between sexual and asexual reproduction in the genus Mimulus. Oecologia 76:330-335.
38. _ 1993 On the relative importance of floral color, shape and nectar rewards in attracting pollinators to Mimulus. Great Basin Nat 53:107-117.
39. Temeles EJ 1996 A new dimension to hummingbird-flower relationships. Oecologia 105:517-523.
40. Theissen G, A Becker, A Di Rosa, A Kanno, JT Kim, T Münster, K-U Winter, H Saedler 2000 A short history of MADS-box genes in plants. Plant Mol Biol 42:115-149.
41. Thomson JD, P Wilson, M Valenzuela, M Malzone 2000 Pollen presentation and pollination syndromes, with special reference to Penstemon. Plant Species Biol 15:11-29.
42. Vickery RK Jr 1990 Pollination experiments in the Mimulus cardinalis-M. lewisii complex. Great Basin Nat 50:155-159.
43. _ 1992 Pollinator preferences for yellow, orange and red flowers of Mimulus verbenaceus and M. cardinalis. Great Basin Nat 52:145-148.
44. _ 1995 Speciation in Mimulus, or can a simple flower color mutant lead to species divergence? Great Basin Nat 55:177-180.
45. Vickery RK Jr, SD Sutherland 1994 Variance and replenishment of nectar in wild and greenhouse populations of Mimulus. Great Basin Nat 54:212-227.
46. Wilson P, MC Castellanos, JN Hogue, JD Thomson, WS Armbruster 2004 A multivariate search for pollination syndromes among penstemons. Oikos 104:345-361.
47. Wilson P, MC Castellanos, AD Wolfe, JD Thomson Forthcoming Shifts between bee- and bird-pollination among penstemons. In NM Waser, J Ollerton, eds. Specialization and generalization in pollination systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.