The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming

Brain and Language

Volumn 90, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 203-212

  Dohmes, Petra ^a   Zwitserlood, Pienie ^a   Bölte, Jens ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Morphology; Picture word interference; Semantic transparency; Speech production

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONALITY TEST; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 2542486316     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00433-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Aronoff M. Morphology by itself. 1994;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
2. Baayen H., Schreuder R. War and peace: Morphemes and full forms in a noninteractive activation parallel dual-route model. Brain and Language. 68:1999;27-32
3. Baumann, H., Nagengast, J., & Wittenburg, P. (1992). A new experimental set-up tool for experiments in the 90ties. Paper presented at the international congress of social science information technology, Amsterdam, NL
4. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B. 57:1995;289-300
5. Bentin S., Feldman L.B. The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A. 42:1990;693-711
6. Butterworth B. Lexical representation. Butterworth B. Language production: Vol. 2. Development, writing and other language processes. 1983;Academic Press, London
7. Caramazza A., Laudanna A., Romani C. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition. 28:1988;297-332
8. Chialant D., Caramazza A. Where is morphology and how is it represented? The case of written word recognition. Feldman L.B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
9. Dressler W.U., Libben G., Stark J., Pons C., Jarema G. The processing of interfixed German compounds. Booij G., van Marle J. Yearbook of morphology 1999. 2001;185-220 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
10. Drews E., Zwitserlood P. Effect of morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21:1995;1098-1116
11. Feldman L.B. Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 26:2000;1431-1444
12. Krott A., Krebbers L., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Semantic influence on linkers in Dutch noun-noun compounds. Folia Linguistica. 36:2002;7-22
13. Krott A., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Linking elements in Dutch noun-noun compounds: Constituent families as analogical predictors for response latencies. Brain and Languge. 81:2002;708-722
14. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking: From intention to articulation. 1989;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
15. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., Meyer A. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 22:1999;1-75
16. Libben G., Jarema G., Dressler W.U., Stark J., Pons C. Triangulating the effects of interfixation in the processing of German compounds. Folia Linguistica. 36:2002;23-43
17. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L.K., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review. 101:1994;3-33
18. Monsell S. Repetition and the lexicon. Ellis A.W. Progress in the psychology of language. 1985;Erlbaum, Hove, UK
19. Plaut D.C., Gonnerman L.M. Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes. 15:2000;445-485
20. Roelofs A. Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word. Journal of Memory and Language. 35:1996;854-876
21. Roelofs A. Rightward incrementality in encoding simple phrasal forms in speech production: Verb-particle combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 24:1998;904-921
22. Roelofs A., Baayen H. Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 9:2002;132-138
23. Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Modeling morphological processing. Feldman L.B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
24. Schriefers H., Meyer A., Levelt W. Exploring the time course of lexical access in production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1990;26-47
25. Seidenberg M., McClelland J. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review. 96:1989;523-568
26. Starreveld P.A., La Heij W. Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 21:1995;686-698
27. Stemberger J.P. An interactive activation model of language production. Ellis A.W. Progress in the psychology of language. 1985;Erlbaum, Hove, UK
28. Stolz J., Feldman L.B. The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. Feldman L.B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
29. Taft M., Forster K.I. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 15:1976;607-620
30. Zwitserlood P. The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes. 9:1994;341-386
31. Zwitserlood P., Bölte J., Dohmes P. Morphological effects on speech production: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes. 15(4-5):2000;563-591
32. Zwitserlood P., Bölte J., Dohmes P. Where and how morphologically complex words interplay with naming pictures. Brain and Language. 81:2002;358-367