Pollination system and evolution of dioecy from distyly in Mussaenda parviflora (Rubiaceae)

Plant Species Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 217-227

  Naiki, Akiyo ^a   Kato, Makoto ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cryptic dioecy; Lepidoptera; Pollination

Indexed keywords

MUSSAENDA PARVIFLORA;

EID: 0033395141     PISSN: 0913557X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-1984.1999.00021.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baker H. G. (1958) Studies in the reproductive biology of West African Rubiaceae. Journal of the West African Science Association 4: 9-24.
2. Baker H. G. & Baker I. (1982) Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In: Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology (eds L. Gilbert, E. & R. J. Little) pp. 117-141. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
3. Barrett S. C. H. (1998) The evolution of mating strategies in flowering plants. Trends in Plant Science 3: 335-341.
4. Barrett S. C. H., Shore J. S. & Richards J. H. (1990) Heterostyly in tropical plants. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 55: 35-61.
5. Bawa K. S. (1980) Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 15-39.
6. Bawa K. S. & Beach J. H. (1983) Self-incompatibility systems in the Rubiaceae of a tropical lowland wet forest. American Journal of Botany 70: 1281-1288.
7. Bawa K. S. & Opler P. A. (1975) Dioecism in tropical forest trees. Evolution 29: 167-179.
8. Beach J. H. & Bawa K. S. (1980) Role of pollination in the evolution of dioecy from distyly. Evolution 34: 1138-1142.
9. Charlesworth B. & Charlesworth D. (1978) A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112: 975-997.
10. De Jong T. J., Waser N. M. & Klinkhamer P. G. (1993) Geitonogamy: The neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 321-325.
11. Dulberger R. (1992) Floral polymorphisms and their functional significance in heterostylous syndrome. In: Evolution and Function of Heterostyly (ed. S. C. H. Barrett) pp. 41-84. Springer, Berlin.
12. Endress. P. K. (1994) Diversity and Evolutionary Biology of Tropical Flowers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Erdtman G. (1960) The acetolysis method. Svensk Botanik Tidskrift 54: 561-564.
14. Freeman D. C., Doust J. L., El-Keblawy A., Miglia K. J. & McArthur E. D. (1997) Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. Botanical Review 63: 65-92.
15. Ganders F. R. (1979) The biology of heterostyly. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17: 607-635.
16. Haber W. A. & Bawa K. S. (1984) Evolution of dioecy in Saurauia (Dilleniaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71: 289-293.
17. Kato M. & Nagamasu H. (1995) Dioecy in the endemic genus Dendrocacalia (Compositae) on the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. Journal of Plant Research 108: 443-450.
18. Kawakubo N. (1990) Dioecism of the genus Callicarpa (Verbenaceae) in the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. The Botanical Magazine, Tokyo 103: 57-66.
19. Kevan P. G. & Lack A. J. (1985) Pollination in a cryptically dioecious plant Decaspermum parvifolium (Lam.) A. J. Scott (Myrtaceae) by pollen-collecting bees in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biological Journal of Linnean Society 25: 319-330.
20. Lloyd D. G. (1979) Evolution towards dioecy in heterostylous populations. Plant Systematics and Evolution 131: 71-80.
21. Lloyd D. G. (1980) The distributions of gender in four angiosperm species illustrating two evolutionary pathways to dioecy. Evolution 34: 123-134.
22. Lloyd D. G. (1992) The selection of heterostyly. In: Evolution and Function of Heterostyly (ed. S. C. H. Barrett) pp. 179-207. Springer, Berlin.
23. Mabberley D. J. (1997). The Plant Book, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Mayer S. S. & Charlesworth D. (1991) Cryptic dioecy in flowering plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 320-325.
25. McKenna M. A. (1992) Pollen competition in heterostylous plants. In: Evolution and function of Heterostyly (ed. S. C. H. Barrett) pp. 225-272. Springer, Berlin.
26. Murray B. G. (1990) Heterostyly and pollen-tube interactions in Luculia gratissima (Rubiaceae). Annals of Botany 65: 691-698.
27. Nicholls M.S. (1987) Pollen flow, self-pollination and gender specialization: Factors affecting seed-set in the tristylous species Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 131: 151-157.
28. Pailler T. & Thompson J. D. (1997) Distyly and variation in heteromorphic incompatibility in Gaertnera vaginata (Rubiaceae) endemic to La Reunion Island. American Journal of Botany 84: 315-327.
29. Percival M. S. (1961) Types of nectar in angiosperms. New Phytologist 60: 235-281.
30. Piper J. D. & Charlesworth B. (1979) The evolution of distyly in Primula vulgaris. Biological Journal of Linnean Society 29: 123-173.
31. Proctor M., Yeo P. & Lack A. (1996). The Natural History of Pollination. Timber, Portland.
32. Renner S. S. & Ricklefs R. E. (1995) Dioecy and its correlates in flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82: 596-606.
33. Richards J. H. & Koptur S. (1993) Floral variation and distyly in Guettarda scabra (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 31-40.
34. Ross M. D. (1970) Evolution of dioecy from gynodioecy. Evolution 24: 827-828.
35. Schumann K. (1891) Rubiaceae. In: Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien (eds A. Engler & K. Prantl), 4: 1-156. Engelmann, Leipzig.
36. Shore J. S. & Barrett S. C. H. (1984) The effect of pollination and incompatible pollen on seed set in Turnera ulmifolia (Turneraceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 62: 1298-1303.
37. Stone J. L. & Thomson J. D. (1994) The evolution of distyly: Pollen transfer in artificial flowers. Evolution 48: 1595-1606.
38. Stone J. L. & Thomson J. D. (1995) Pollen donation patterns in a tropical distylous shrub (Psychotria suerrensis; Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 1390-1398.
39. Tanaka H. (1973) Moth pollination of Clerodendron trichotomum (in Japanese). Journal of Japanese Botany 48: 209-214.
40. Thomson J. D. & Brunet J. (1990) Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5: 11-16.
41. Washitani I., Kato M., Nishihiro J. & Suzuki K. (1995) Importance of queen bumble bees as pollinators facilitating intermorph crossing in Primula sieboldii. Plant Species Biology 9: 169-176.
42. Willmott A. P. & Búrquez A. (1996) The pollination of Merremia palmeri (Convolvulaceae): Can hawk moths be trusted? American Journal of Botany 83: 1050-1056.