On the preattentive accessibility of stereoscopic disparity: Evidence from visual search

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 202-218

  O'Toole, Alice J ^a   Walker, Candice L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION; VISION DISPARITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0031066341     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211889     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ANDERSEN, G. J., & KRAMER, A. F. (1993). Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 658-667.
2. BRAVO, M. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 465-472.
3. CAVANAGH, P., ARGUIN, M., & TREISMAN, A. (1990). Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features. Journal of Experimental Psrchology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 479-491.
4. COHEN, A., & IVRY, R. B. (1991). Density effects in conjunction search: Evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 891-901.
5. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
6. EGETH, H., JONIDES, J., & WALL, S. (1972). Parallel processing of multielement displays. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 674-698.
7. ERKELENS, C. J. (1988). Fusional limits for a large random-dot stereogram. Vision Research, 28, 345-353.
8. FRISBY, J. P., BUCKLEY, D., WISHART, K. A., PORRILL, J., GARDING, J., & MAYHEW, J. E. (1995). Interaction of stereo and texture cues in the perception of three-dimensional steps. Vision Research, 35, 1463-1472.
9. HE, Z., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233.
10. ISHIGUSHI, A., & WOLFE, J. M. (1993). Asymmetrical effect of crossed and uncrossed disparity on stereoscopic capture. Perception, 22, 1403-1413.
11. JULESZ, B. (1964). Binocular depth perception without familiarity cues. Science, 145, 356-362.
12. MITCHELL, D. E. (1966). A review of the concept of Panum's fusional areas. American Journal of Optometry, 43, 387-401.
13. NAKAYAMA, K., & SILVERMAN, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 253-254.
14. O'TOOLE, A. J., & KERSTEN, D. J. (1992). Learning to see random-dot stereograms. Perception, 21, 227-243.
15. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. (1976). Learning-like phenomena in stereopsis. Nature, 262, 392-394.
16. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. (1988). Perception of shape from shading. Nature, 331, 163-166.
17. RICHARDS, W. (1970). Stereopsis and stereoblindness. Experimental Brain Research. 10, 380-388.
18. RICHARDS, W. (1971). Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 61, 410-414.
19. STEINMAN, S. B. (1987). Serial or parallel search in pattern vision. Perception, 16, 389-398.
20. THEEUWES, J. (1994). Endogenous and exogenous control of visual attention. Perception, 23, 429-440.
21. TOWNSEND, J. T. (1971). A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 161-163.
22. TOWNSEND, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46-54.
23. TREISMAN, A., CAVANAGH, P., FISCHER, B., RAMACHANDRAN, V., & VON DER HEYDT, R. (1990). Form perception and attention: Striate cortex and beyond. In L. Spillmann & J. S. Werner (Eds.), Visual perception: The neurophysiological foundations (pp. 273-316). San Diego: Academic Press.
24. TREISMAN, A., & GORMICAN, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
25. TREISMAN, A., & SATO, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459-478.
26. TREISMAN, A., & SOUTHER, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285-310.
27. WESTHEIMER, G. (1979). Cooperative neural processes involved in stereoscopic acuity. Experimental Brain Research, 36, 585-597.
28. WOLFE, J. M. (1992). "Effortless" texture segmentation and "parallel" visual search are not the same thing. Vision Research, 32, 757-763.
29. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
30. WOLFE, J. M., CAVE, K. R., & FRANZEL, S. L. (1989). Guided Search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-431.