Assessing the new United Kingdom protocol for dealing with delay and disruption

Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 50-59

  Scott, Steve ^a   Harris, Richard Anthony ^a   Greenwood, David ^b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Claims; Delay time; Dispute resolution; Time factors; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; CONTRACTS; COSTS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

CLAIMS; DELAY TIME; DISPUTE RESOLUTION; TIME FACTORS; UNITED KINGDOM;

CONSTRUCTION;

EID: 14544304062     PISSN: 10523928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2004)130:1(50)     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bordoli, D., and Baldwin, A. (1998). "A methodology for assessing construction project delays." Constr. Manage. Econom., 16, 327-337.
2. Bresnen, M. J., Haslam, C. O., Beardsworth, A. D., Bryman, A. E., and Hell, E. T. (1990). "Performance on site and the building client." Occasional Paper No. 42, Chartered Institute of Building, Ascot, U.K.
3. Bubshait, A. A., and Cunningham, M. J. (1998). "Comparison of delay analysis methodologies." J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(4), 315-322.
4. Duncan-Wallace, I. N. (1995). Hudson's building and engineering contracts, 11th Ed., Sweet & Maxwell, London.
5. Harris, R. A. (2000). "An assessment of construction contract claims in the UK." PhD thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne.
6. Householder, J. L., and Rutland, H. E. (1990). "Who owns float?" J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 116(1), 130-133.
7. Kartam, S. (1999). "Generic methodology for analyzing delay claims." J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(6), 409-419.
8. Knoke, J. R., and Jentzen, G. H. (1994). "Facilitate delay claim analysis with as-built schedule database." Proc., 1st Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, New York.
9. Kraiem, Z. M., and Diekmann, J. E. (1987). "Concurrent delays in construction projects." J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 13(4), 591-602.
10. Majid, M. Z. A., and McCaffer, R. (1998). "Factors of nonexcusable delays that influence contractors' performance." J. Manage. Eng., 14(3), 42-49.
11. National Economic Development Council (NEDC) for Building. (1983). "Faster building for industry." National Economic Development Office, HMSO, London.
12. National Economic Development Council (NEDC) for Construction. (1988). "Faster building for commerce." National Economic Development Office, HMSO, London.
13. Rubin, R. A., et al. (1983). Construction claims analysis, presentation, defense, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
14. Scott, S. (1993a). "Dealing with delay claims: A survey." Int. J. Proj. Manage., 11(3), 143-153.
15. Scott, S. (1993b). "The nature and effects of construction delays." Constr. Manage. Econom., 11, 358-369.
16. Society of Construction Law (SCL). (2002). "Protocol for determining extensions of time and compensation for delay and disruption." 〈http://www.eotprotocol.com〉.
17. Thomas, R. W. (1993). Construction contract claims, Macmillan, New York.
18. Thompson, R. M., Vorster, M. C., and Groton, J. P. (2000). "Innovations to manage disputes: DRB and NEC." J. Manage. Eng., 16(5), 51-59.
19. Wickwire, J. M., et al. (1989). "Use of critical path method techniques in contract claims: Issues and developments, 1974 to 1988." Public Contract Law J., 18, 338-391.
20. Yogeswaran, K., et al. (1998). "Claims for extensions of time in civil engineering projects." Constr. Manage. Econom., 16, 283-293.
21. Zack, J. G., Jr. (1993). "Claimsmanship: Current perspective." J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 119(3), 480-497.