Generic methodology for analyzing delay claims

Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

Volumn 125, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 409-419

  Kartam, Saied ^a  

^a CH2M HILL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACTS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; RISK MANAGEMENT; SCHEDULING;

DELAY CLAIMS;

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY;

EID: 0033342184     PISSN: 07339364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:6(409)     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Alkass, S., Mazerolle, M., Tribaldos, E., and Harris, F. (1995). "Computer aided construction delay analysis and claims preparation." Constr. Mgmt. and Economics, 13(4), 335-352.
2. Kallo, G. (1996). "The reliability of critical path method (CPM) techniques in the analysis and evaluation of delay claims." Cost Engrg., 38(5), 35-37.
3. Kraiem, Z., and Diekmann, J. (1987). "Concurrent delays in construction projects." J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 113(4), 591-602.
4. Ritz, G. (1994). Total construction project management. McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. Schumacher, L. (1996). "An integrated and proactive approach for avoiding delay claims on major capital projects." Cost Engrg., 38(6), 37-39.
6. Schumacher, L. (1997). "Defusing delay claims." Civ. Engrg. Mag., 67(3), ASCE, New York, 60-62.