In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 25, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 331-337

  Meredith, N ^a   Setchell, D J ^b  

^a BRISTOL DENTAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bonded; Composite; Dental; Flexure; Strain

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; P 30 COMPOSITE RESIN; P-30 COMPOSITE RESIN; P50 COMPOSITE RESIN; PHOSPHORIC ACID; POLYMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND 2;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOLAR TOOTH; PHYSIOLOGY; SCOTCHBOND; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADHESIVES; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; HUMANS; MOLAR; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYMERS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0031138018     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00047-4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Accomplishments and expectations with posterior composite resin. In: Vanherle G and Smith DC, eds. Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. St. Paul: 3M Co., 1985; pp 521-540.
2. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerisation shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintess Int 1986; 17: 103-111.
3. Goldman M. Polymerisation shrinkage of resin based restorative materials. Aust Dent J 1983; 28: 156-161.
4. Söderholm KJM. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: a report of the ASC MD186 Test Group on Test Methods for the Adhesion of Restorative Materials. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 74-83.
5. Jörgensen KD, Itoh K, Munksgaard EC, Asmussen E. Composite wall-to-wall polymerisation contraction in dentin cavities treated with various bonding agents. Scand J Dem Res 1985; 93: 276-279.
6. Causton BE, Miller B, Sefton J. The deformation of cusps by bonded posterior composite restorations: an in-vitro study. Br Dent J 1985; 159: 397-400.
7. Pearson GJ, Hegarty SM. Cusp movement in molar teeth using dentine adhesives and composite filling materials. Biomaterials 1987; 8: 473-476.
8. Pearson GJ, Hegarty SM. Cusp movement of molar teeth with composite filling materials in conventional and modified MOD cavities. Br Dent J 1989; 166: 162-165.
9. Suliman AA, Boyer DB, Lakes RS. Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerisation shrinkage. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 6-10.
10. Jensen ME, Chan DCN. Polymerisation shrinkage and microleakage. In: Vanherle G and Smith DC, eds. Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. St. Paul: 3M Co., 1985; pp 243-262 .
11. Donley KJ, Wild TW, Bowen RL, Jensen ME. An in-vitro investigation of the effects of glass inserts on the effective composite resin polymerisation shrinkage. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1234-1237.
12. Grimaldi JR, Hood JAA. Lateral deformation of the tooth crown under axial cuspal loading. J Dent Res 1973; 52: 584.
13. Wheeler RC In: Dental Anatomy, Physiology and Occlusion, St. Louis, USA: WB Saunders, 1971; pp 267-298.
14. Vale WA. Cavity preparation and further thoughts on high speed. Br Dent J 1959; 107: 333-342.
15. McCullock AJ, Smith BGN. In-vitro studies of cusp reinforcement with adhesive restorative material. Br Dent J 1986; 161: 450-452.
16. Bell JG, Smith MC, DePont JJ. Cuspal failure of MOD restored teeth. Aust Dent J 1982; 27: 283-287.
17. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerisation contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 146-148.
18. Asmussen E. Composite restorative resin. Composition versus wall-to-wall polymerisation contraction. Acta Odont Scand 1975; 33: 337-344.
19. Bowen RL, Nemoto K, Rapson JE. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: forces developing in composite materials during hardening. J Am Dent Assoc 1983; 106: 475-477.
20. Joynt RB, Wieczkowski G, Klockowski R, Davis EH. Effects of composite restorations on resistance to cuspal fracture in posterior teeth. J Prosth Dent 1987; 57: 431-435.
21. Douglas WH. Methods to improve the fracture resistance of teeth. In: Vanherle G and Smith DC, eds. Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. St. Paul: 3M Co., 1985; pp 521-540.