Evaluating the planned substitution of the minimum data set-post acute care for use in the rehabilitation hospital prospective payment system

Medical Care

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 155-163

  Buchanan, Joan L ^a   Andres, Patricia L ^b   Haley, Stephen M ^b   Paddock, Susan M ^c   Zaslavsky, Alan M ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Functional assessment; Rehabilitation PPS

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MEDICARE; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CENTER; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MEDICARE; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CENTERS; SUBACUTE CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1442303991     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000108745.40491.01     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, et al. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of the ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychological functioning. JAMA. 1963;185:914-919.
2. Morris JN, Hawes C, Fries BE, et al. Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes. Gerontologist. 1990;30:293-307.
3. Hittle DF, Crisler KS, Beaudry JM, et al. OASIS chronicle and recommendations. In: Shaughnessy PW, Crisler KS, Hittle DF, et al., eds. OASIS and Outcome-Based Quality Improvement in Home Health Care: Research & Demonstration Findings, Policy Implications, and Considerations for Future Change. Denver: Center for Health Services Research, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; March 2002. Also available at: www.cms.hhs.gov/ providers/hha.
4. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 1986;1:59-74.
5. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, et al. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation, In: Fuhrer MJ, ed. Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co; 1987.
6. Stineman MG, Goin JE, Hamilton BB, et al. A case mix classification system for medical rehabilitation. Med Care. 1994;32:366-379.
7. Stineman MG, Tassoni CJ, Escarce JJ, et al. Development of function-related groups version 2. 0: a classification system for medical rehabilitation. Health Serv-Res. 1997;32:529-548.
8. Carter GM, Buntin MB, Hayden O, et al. Analyses for the Initial Implementation for Medicare's Inpatient Rehabilitation Prospective Payment System. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, MR-1500-CMS; 2002.
9. Kane RL, Finch M, Blewett L, et al. Use of post-hospital care by Medicare patients. J Am GeriatrSoc. 1996;44:242-250.
10. Kane RL, Chen Q, Finch M, et al. The optimal outcomes of post-hospital care under Medicare. Health Serv Res. 2000;35:615-661.
11. Kramer AM, Steiner JF, Schlenker RE, et al. Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke: a comparison of rehabilitation settings. JAMA. 1997;277:396-404.
12. Steiner A. Post-Hospital Care for the Vulnerable Elderly: Are Discharge Patterns Equitable? Santa Monica: RAND, RGSD-103; 1993.
13. Medicare and the American Health Care System Report to Congress. Prospective Payment Assessment Commission; Washington, DC: June 1996.
14. Hawes C, Morris JN, Phillips CD, et al. Development of the nursing home Resident Assessment Instrument in the USA. Age Aging. 1997; 26:19-25.
15. Williams BC, Li Y, Fries BE, et al. Predicting patient scores between the Functional Independence Measure and the Minimum Data Set: development and performance of a FIM-MDS 'crosswalk.' Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:48-54.
16. Health Care Financing Administration.Medicare Program. Prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Federal Register. 2000:3:2000.
17. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare program; prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities; final rule. Federal Register. 2001;66:41315-41430.
18. Buchanan JL, Andres PL, Haley SM, et al. An assessment tool translation study. Health Care Financing Review. 2003;24:45-60.
19. Buchanan JL, Andres P, Haley SM, et al. Final Report on the Instruments for PPS. Santa Monica: RAND, MR-1501-CMS; 2002.
20. McDowell I, Newll C. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.