Contact impedance estimation for robotic systems

2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

Volumn 3, Issue , 2004, Pages 2538-2543

  Diolaiti, N ^a   Melchiorri, C ^a   Stramigioli, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; DAMPING; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ENERGY DISSIPATION; GEOMETRY; HYSTERESIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; STIFFNESS;

COMPLIANT CONTACT MODELS; HUNT-CROSSLEY MODEL; KELVIN-VOIGT MODEL; ROBOTIC DEVICES;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 14044270792     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. L. J. Love and W. J. Book, "Environment estimation for enhanced impedance control," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, Nagoya, Japan, May 1995, pp. 1854-1839.
2. N. Hogan, "Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part I - Theory, Part II - Implementation, Part III - Applications," ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurment and Control, vol. 107, 1985.
3. D. Erickson, M. Weber, and I. Sharf, "Contact stiffness and damping estimation for robotic systems," The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 41-57, January 2003.
4. P. Arcara and C. Melchiorri, MISTRAL: Methodologies and Integration of Subsystems and Technologies for Anthropic Robots and Locomotion. Springer-Verlag, 2003, ch. Comparison and Improvement of Control Schemes for Robotic Teleoperation Systems with Time Delay.
5. E. Colgate, "Robust impedance shaping telemanipulation," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 374-384, August 1993.
6. S. Hirche and M. Buss, "Passive position controlled telepresence systems with time delay," in American Control Conference, vol. 1, Denver, USA, June 2003, pp. 168-173.
7. G. Gilardi and I. Sharf, "Literature survey of contact dynamics modelling," Journal of Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1213-1239, October 2002.
8. K. Hunt and F. Crossley, "Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact," ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, pp. 440-445, June 1975.
9. D. W. Marhefka and D. E. Orin, "A compliant contact model with nonlinear damping for simulations of robotic systems," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 566-572, November 1999.
10. S. Stramigioli, "Port-hamiltonian modeling of spatial compliant contacts," in 2nd Workshop on Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Methods for Nonlinear Control (LHMNLC03). Sevilla, Spain: IFAC, June 2003.
11. W. Fluggë, Viscoelasticity. Waltham, Mass.: Blaisdell Publishing Company, 1967.
12. W. Goldsmith, Impact: The Theory and Physical Behavior of Colliding Solids. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd, 1960.
13. K. L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989.
14. L. Ljung and T. Södertström, Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1983.
15. Y. Bar-Shalom and X.-R. Li, Estimation and Tracking: Principles, Techniques, and Software. Artech House, 1993.