Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes

Sex Roles

Volumn 51, Issue 11-12, 2004, Pages 687-696

  Sibley, Chris G ^a   Wilson, Marc Stewart ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Ambivalent sexism; Masculinity; Prejudice; Self concept

Indexed keywords

EID: 13844255139     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abbey, A., & Harnish, R. J. (1995). Perception of sexual intent: The role of gender, alcohol consumption, and rape supportive attitudes. Sex Roles, 32, 297-313.
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
3. Andersen, B. L., Cyranowski, J. M., & Espindle, D. (1999). Men's sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 645-661.
4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach for representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35-67.
5. Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power → sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
6. Baron, R. M., & Kenney, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
7. Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (1998). Subtypes of women and men: A new taxonomy and an exploratory categorical analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 679-696.
8. Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (2001). Should we take "gender" out of gender subtypes? The effects of gender, evaluative valence, and context on the organization of person subtypes. Sex Roles, 45, 455-480.
9. Cyranowski, J. M., & Andersen, B. L. (1998). Schemas, sexuality, and romantic attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1364-1379.
10. Cyranowski, J. M. & Andersen, B. L. (2000). Evidence of self-schematic cognitive processing in women with differing sexual self-views. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 519-543.
11. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93.
12. Eckes, T. (1994a). Explorations in gender cognition: Content and structure of female and male subtypes. Social Cognition, 12, 37-60.
13. Eckes, T. (1994b). Features of men, features of women: Assessing stereotypic beliefs about gender subtypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 107-123.
14. Eckes, T. (2001). Ambivalenter sexismus und die polarisierung von geschlechterstereotypen [Ambivalent sexism and the polarization of gender stereotypes]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32, 235-247.
15. Faludi, S. (1992). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Doubleday.
16. Fong, G. T., & Markus, H. (1982). Self-schemas and judgments about others. Social Cognition, 1, 191-204.
17. Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., White, K. B., & Holmgren, K. M. (2003). The role of hostile and benevolent sexism in women's and men's perceptions of the menstruating woman. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 58-63.
18. García, L. T. (1999). The certainty of the sexual self-concept. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 8, 263-270.
19. García, L. T., & Kushnier, K. (1987). Sexual inferences about female targets: The use of sexual experience correlates. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 252-256.
20. Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323-1334.
21. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
22. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119-135.
23. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
24. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2002). Ambivalent responses. American Psychologist, 57, 444-446.
25. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
26. Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1994). Preferring "housewives" to "feminists": Categorization and the favorability of attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 25-52.
27. Hollingshead, A. B., & Fraidin, S. N. (2003). Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 355-363.
28. Kendzierski, D., Sheffield, A., & Morganstein, M. S. (2002). The role of self-schema in attributions for own versus other's exercise lapse. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 251-260.
29. Lewicki, P. (1983). Self-image bias in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 384-393.
30. Lewicki, P. (1984). Self-schema and social information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1177-1190.
31. Markus, H., Crane, M., Bernstein, S., & Siladi, M. (1982). Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 38-50.
32. Markus, H., & Smith, J. (1981). The influence of self-schemas on the perception of others. In N. Cantor & J. Kihlström (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 233-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Markus, H., Smith, J., & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494-1512.
34. Masser, B., & Abrams, D. (1999). Contemporary sexism: The relationships among hostility, benevolence, and neosexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 503-517.
35. Pek, J. C. X., & Leong, F. T. L. (2003). Sex-related self-concepts, cognitive styles, and cultural values of traditionality-modernity as predictors of general and domain-specific sexism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 31-49.
36. Petrocelli, J. V. (2002). Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Where's the ambivalence? American Psychologist, 57, 443-444.
37. Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565-573.
38. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Six, B., & Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24, 57-71.
40. Tavris, C., & Wade, C. (1984). The longest war: Sex differences in perspective (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
41. Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361-386). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Vélez-Blasini, C. J., & Brandt, H. J. (2000). Expectancies, setting, age, and beverage choice as predictors of sexual behaviors in hypothetical dating situations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1954-1976.
43. Viki, G. T., & Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289-293.
44. Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Hutchison, P. (2003). The "true" romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49, 533-537.