The role of hostile and benevolent sexism in women's and men's perceptions of the menstruating woman

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 58-63

  Forbes, Gordon B ^a   Adams Curtis, Leah E ^a   White, Kay B ^a   Holmgren, Katie M ^a  

^a MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038488254     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00007     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Brooks-Gunn, J., & Ruble, D. N. (1986). Men's and women's attitudes and beliefs about the menstrual cycle. Sex Roles, 14, 287-299.
2. Brownmiller, S. (1984). Femininity. New York: Ballantine Books.
3. Buckley, T., & Gottlieb, A. (1988). Blood magic: The anthropology of menstruation, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
4. Chrisler, J. C., Johnston, I. K., Champagne, N. M., & Preston, K. E. (1994). Menstrual joy: The construct and its consequences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 375-387.
5. Clarke, A., & Ruble, D. N. (1978). Young adolescents' beliefs concerning menstruation. Child Development, 49, 201-234.
6. Coutts, L. B., & Berg, D. H. (1993). The portrayal of the menstruating woman in menstrual products advertisements. Health Care for Women International, 14, 179-191.
7. nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
8. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. In M. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 417-440). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
9. Donelson, F. E. (1999). Women's experiences: A psychological perspective. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
10. Funder, D. C. (1992). Global traits: A neo-Allportian approach to personality. Psychological Science, 2, 31-39.
11. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
12. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
13. Golub, S. (1981). Sex differences in attitudes and beliefs regarding menstruation. In P. Komnenich, M. McSweeney, J. A. Noack, & N. Elder (Eds.), The menstrual cycle (Vol 2, pp. 129-134). New York: Springer.
14. Havens, B. B., & Swenson, I. (1988). Imagery associated with menstruation in advertising targeted to adolescents. Adolescence, 89, 89-97.
15. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65-70.
16. Laws, S. K. (1990). Issues of blood: The politics of menstruation. London: MacMillan.
17. Lippa, R. (1991). Some psychometric characteristics of gender diagnosticity measures: Reliability, validity, consistency across domains, and relationship to the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1000-1011.
18. Merskin, D. (1999). Adolescence, advertising, and the ideology of menstruation. Sex Roles, 40, 941-957.
19. Parlee, M. M. (1974). Stereotypic beliefs about menstruation: A methodological note on the Moos Menstrual Distress Questionnaire and some new data. Psychosomatic Medicine, 36, 229-240.
20. Ruble, D. N., Boggiano, A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1982). Men's and women's evaluation of menstrual-related excuses. Sex Roles, 8, 625-638.
21. Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. (1995). Masculinity and femininity: Defining the undefinable. In P. J. Kalbfleisch & M. J. Cody (Eds.), Gender, power and communication in human relationships (pp. 105-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.